Right-wing donors spent millions on a Scheme to capture our Supreme Court. Now it’s payday, and the Scheme is out to destroy established precedent and dismantle American government. Thread ->
These donors need justices who will do what they ask, but they also need legal theories that enable justices to get around longstanding precedent. When you’re spending more than half a billion dollars on a Scheme, you can find solutions.
How do they do it? First, they spawn an array of legal think tanks & phony “institutes.” These are hothouses in which the deconstruction theories are grown; the factories where doctrines are crafted, reverse-engineered from the results the big donors want.
Then, they create an echo chamber of approval for their cultivated fringe ideas. The ideas get bounced around through other anonymously-funded affiliate groups, through law school clubs and conservative conferences - and ultimately to the Supreme Court.
These Scheme doctrines would hamstring federal agencies, undercut public health & safety, and open up our government to even greater corporate political influence. This is what’s at stake when we talk about the captured Court.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Overturning Roe is just one goal for the Supreme Court’s Republican justices. For decades, far-right donors have wanted to gut the EPA and weaken the federal government’s regulatory powers. THREAD ->
Soon, the Court will release a decision in West Virginia v. EPA. This is a chance for the Court to advance a fringe right-wing theory and dismantle the core of modern government that protects you, your family, your community, and the environment.
Cooked-up doctrines like the “major questions doctrine” make it easier for corporations to pollute your air and water, sell you dangerous products and tainted food, and get away with deceptive practices.
The NRA dominates Republicans, using enormous amounts of hidden political money to enforce a blockade of legislative action.
The fossil fuel industry rules Republicans, using enormous amounts of hidden political money to blockade any serious legislative action on climate change.
The Supreme Court has been packed like some crooked railroad commission, using enormous amounts of hidden political money, to rule over us by going around legislative action.
Behind climate change inaction in Congress is climate change obstruction by corporate America. nytimes.com/2022/05/19/opi…
Add up the lobbying, the election spending and the trade associations, and you have huge anti-climate pressure in Congress from corporate America — led by the @USChamber, but it’s only one of a hundred negative corporate forces.
I was just in Davos, hearing lots of corporate happy talk on climate, and trying to explain the actual political effort from corporate America in Congress. Basically, it’s the disinterested, the opposed, and the rabidly opposed, which sums to huge negative pressure.
The right-wing scheme to control our courts just scored a big win in the 5th Circuit – a win that threatens a huge array of protections for Americans’ health, safety, and environment. Here’s how -> THREAD
First, you need know it isn’t enough for right-wing donors to pack the courts with reliable judges; those judges need legal theories to justify their rulings. Enter the Scheme’s legal theory hothouse.
The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals just used one of those hothouse theories to limit the SEC’s power to crack down on investment fraud. Known as the "non-delegation doctrine," it would gut public-interest regulations and make life in America look very different.
The Supreme Court’s ruling in FEC v. Cruz is another victory for right-wing donors in their assault on our campaign finance system, and another step toward unlimited special-interest spending in our elections.
Republican donors’ biggest booster, Mitch McConnell, gave away the game in his brief in this case - he called for gutting our campaign finance laws altogether. He made clear he wants an America where corporations & the wealthiest few wield near-total control over our politics.
Justice Kagan has it right in her dissent: greenlighting the payment schemes at issue in this case "bring[s] this country’s political system into further disrepute."