On the last day of #UoELTConf22, I'll be chairing Neil Speirs and colleagues on "A quiet, unnoticed form of gentle solidarity" and @sbayne on "The ‘mode 3’ university: Is this our future?" Looking forward to it!
Neil plays confronting video of Edinburgh student stories of exclusion, isolation, loneliness, patronisation, bullying, inferiority complex due to social class. Gathered over 20 years but could still be told today. Accents, wealth, privilege, elitism. #UoELTConf22
Classism involves ongoing sustaining of barriers to access of resources for some, and the easing of access for others. Does university teaching still presuppose and reinforce the privileged upbringing of middle and upper classes? #UoELTConf22
Neil: we can look at structures, policies, curricula and procedures, but students and staff maintain class distinction, devaluing and dominance through interactions. How can we cultivate a welcoming culture that looks beyond access? #UoELTConf22
Strive for environmental conditions for all students to thrive and flourish. Look at gaps in pastoral and pedagogical care. Build solidarity through collective labour “not the glorification of entrepreneurial individualism” (Neil). #UoELTConf22
We're now hearing about the value of peer mentoring as safety net, emotional support, a way of legitimising students' diverse ways of being. #UoELTConf22
Now @sbayne talking changing ideas of what the University is via progressive modes (of knowledge, development, ideas of the Uni) #UoELTConf22
Mode 1: ivory tower (linear, disciplinary, elite, “excellence”). Old but still current. Sharp boundaries. Universal knowledge. Separate from the world. #UoELTConf22
Mode 2: network (non-linear, applied, interdisciplinary, discovery, "efficiency”. Mass ed as a “right”. Still elite-ish but more permeable boundaries. Entrepeneurial. Servicing society. Market values and transmission of skills. #UoELTConf22
(oops, networked was wrong for mode 2, that's more Mode 3).
Mode 3: ecological (local and global problem contexts, transdisciplinary, distributed agency). HE as obligation. Weak boundaries. Preparing whole populations for rapid social & tech change. #UoELTConf22
Sian asks if we’re at a change point. Mentions Barnett's “feasible utopia”. Signs of uni’s tackling community problems. Education as enabling rather than consumable, signs in strategy docs (Interconnectedness, social responsibility, lifelong access, sustainability)#UoELTConf22
Some great Q&A on both sessions about how we can be mindful of the sort of university we want to be and how to go about this at different levels and in different ways. Loads to chew on, thanks Neil, Gabriele Negro and @sbayne! #UoELTConf22
PS I haven't done justice to Sian's work here (my excuse is that it's tricky chairing and tweeting at the same time!). No doubt @sbayne will share something far better when it's ready 😁 that explains the complex tensions and multiplicity involved in mode-shifting.
For example, we should be careful of different ways of realising a global and ecological university (I am reminded that ecologies can also be brutal places where only the fittest survive...)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This morning at #UoELTConf22, @robzker asks why, after introducing more compassionate policies around assessment during the pandemic, we would go back to less compassionate policy. How can we tackle uncaring practices and reimagine a more compassionate education?
This is interesting - can cynicism about institutions come from a place of caring? @robzker questions punishment as strength and compassion as weakness. Why should we never do "hand-holding"? Does caring have to be tough love? (my phrasing). #UoELTConf22
Why do we even need to argue about this, what brought us to this place? Where can we go from here? Great provocations, thanks @robzker#UoELTConf22
The #UoELTConf22 begins! Looking forward to a rich 3 days of all things learning and teaching.
First @colmharmon welcomes us with a reminder that we can put longitudinal development at the core of ideas of the university. #UoELTConf22
Next @cathybovill talks co-creation with students. It takes "freedom with discipline". Staff don't need to lose their expertise for students to be meaningful partners. #UoELTConf22
Thinking of technology as entangled rather than as “first” or “last” is important for understanding the ethics of its use and the distributed knowledge required for ethical decision-making. 🧵
Ethics isn’t tied to particular technologies because tech is situated. Each tech is always combined with others. E.g. VLE’s, learning analytics, Turnitin, WhatsApp, email & Google’s search engine are often used in combination. Combinations matters more than individual components.
Each student’s combination is different, shaped not only by the teaching methods, assessment, culture and policy of teachers and institution, but also what the student is used to, their studying conditions, and what their peers are doing.
It can be hard to get students to buy into asynchronous work as much as they buy into synchronous events. I think this has to do with clarity around expectations and rationales.
We have long-standing teacher-centred cultures in HE. It's been lectures, tutorials, homework, assignments & exams.
Now, when we say: please discuss these problems or provocations asynchronously with the class, how do students see it? Is it homework, rather than the main event?
I think it depends on the course culture which, if we don't work hard on shaping, will probably look like that default teacher-centered culture I just described.
Some reasons why it doesn’t make sense to not say that online learning isn’t as good. 🧵
1. Online learning isn’t a method (e.g. recorded lectures or videoconferenced tutorials) and it isn’t a technology (e.g. discussion boards or Zoom). It’s a potentially infinite set of possibilities that *sometimes* involve online communication.
2. The thing that online learning is being compared with isn’t a specific thing either. It’s a potentially infinite set of possibilities that *sometimes* involve people being in the same room at the same time and/or accessing shared physical resources and infrastructure.
We keep looking for big lessons from pandemic remote teaching. I think we should be talking about small lessons instead...
🧵
We already knew that technology matters in education. We knew teachers should grapple with related skills, ethics, professionalism, inclusivity and, yes, theory. The small lesson is that digital education is not optional or specialised. We're all always doing it, like it or not.
We already knew different students find expressing themselves easier or harder in different situations. The small lesson is that this really matters, and we need multiple channels and spaces for communication, and cultures and activities that actually value a diversity of views.