If you want to claim asylum then the *ONLY* way to do that is from within the UK. gov.uk/claim-asylum. That is why people are arriving in boats.
For Ukrainians - and only for Ukrainians and their family members - the UK has introduced an international humanitarian pathway to allow them to get to the UK. It gives them temporary protection on arrival and they can claim asylum once here if they wish. gov.uk/guidance/suppo…
The only ways for at-risk people to apply to come to the UK are fee-paid visa routes (such as work visas) which are expensive and have detailed eligibility criteria it’s not realistic for people fleeing a warzone to meet (particularly the most vulnerable people).
For a small number of at-risk people tailor-made schemes have been offered. But it’s a really tiny number of very specific situations and nationalities this is offered to, such as Afghan interpreters. gov.uk/government/new…
With Afghanistan there was some brief effort made to evacuate people and then there are some ongoing efforts (half-hearted - the numbers are so small). E.g. gov.uk/guidance/afgha…
The UK also offers some refugee resettlement. This is not a humanitarian visa pathway. In general people cannot apply and there is no queue and instead an organisation handpicks a few particularly vulnerable families to relocate. assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
When the government and far right supporters talk about ‘legal’ versus ‘illegal’ refugees this is nonsense. People only really receive refugee status in the UK after they arrive here. Only Ukrainians have been offered an accessible safe and legal humanitarian visa pathway.
The Refugee Convention does not discriminate by means of arrival. Some arrive by air and others overland. For some countries only affluent refugees usually arrive by air (people who can afford a visit or other fee-paid visa). This doesn’t make their asylum claims stronger.
If people talk about legal versus illegal asylum seekers - ask them which visa route a person is supposed to apply for to enter the UK as a ‘legal’ asylum seeker: gov.uk/browse/visas-i… (Answer: there is none)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jennifer Blair

Jennifer Blair Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SqueakinglyJen

Jun 16
We need a route to settlement for people on the Homes for Ukraine Scheme. Many people will go back but some just won’t be in a position to and need to be able to plan their lives.
Eg Ukrainian considering spending all their money setting up a flower shop in Scotland. Sounds like a lovely healing idea but what will happen if their visa is only temporary?
Woman caring for her disabled son. Their home had been destroyed and she’s terrified about the future for her son in case they are displaced again.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 15
I just gave evidence to the asylum inquiry session on resettlement and it was so stark how different the Ukraine Schemes are from an actual resettlement scheme. (committees.parliament.uk/event/13621/fo…)
resettlement is usually where the UK rehomes refugees whose best chance at durable safety is in the UK. They’ve always left their country of origin and are in a tricky situation needing long term protection.
A humanitarian/asylum legal pathway - which might include evacuation from a conflict area - is a very different thing. It’s taking people at the point of erupting danger and offering a safe place to stay, maybe for a while initially with long term options if they can’t return.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 14
I myself have wondered why refugees didn't stay in European countries and have travelled on. So I asked them.
I asked a Sudanese boy who had badly broken his leg on his third attempt to get on a moving lorry from France. He had not been allowed to claim asylum in France and had been beaten by police. He'd heard he'd have a fair hearing in the UK.
I asked an Albanian victim of human trafficking who said he needed to get as far away from the traffickers as possible and as an island not in Schengen it'd be harder for the traffickers to find him and abduct him here. He had also hidden on a lorry.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 13
I don't think the general public realise that the refugees being transported to Rwanda are chosen randomly. They may have the strongest claims, have been through the most horrendous persecution, have the most sympathetic and tragic stories and are still being punished not helped
I don't think people realise that refugees may be transported to Rwanda who have no connection to people smuggling at all and who were never transported by a smuggler or gang. They are random people sacrificed to make the UK look unwelcoming so other people wont pay to come here.
I don't think people have thought through what it means if you transport as punishment people who arrive through a people smuggler. There is no other route for asylum seekers to come to the UK to join family and friends. No visa route or queue.
Read 13 tweets
Mar 13
Ukraine Community Sponsorship Scheme details will apparently be released tomorrow - different information has been trailed in different news outlets over the weekend. What is needed? 🧵
People entering under the scheme will enter with leave to remain (reports vary but hopefully three years) with the right to work and access to public funds. ✅ Self sufficiency outside of charitable hosts is vital for the welfare of applicants.
People can apparently ask to sponsor people they know or volunteer as a general sponsor ✅ It is important that those who have somewhere safe to go in the UK can join friends and for others to access the wider support we are seeing offered.
Read 22 tweets
Nov 19, 2019
*Thread* kindness in immigration appeals. Unrepresented litigant on my list at court today. At 10am he wasn’t there. Many judges might have gone ahead and just heard the case in his absence.
If the case had gone ahead in his absence, since the issue was (as I later found out - spoiler) disputed credibility and it was for him to prove his case he could not have won. It was an asylum appeal so he potentially faces very serious harm or death as a result of this appeal.
The judge was clearly concerned about this - not wanting to send someone to their death due to an administrative error - so she told the court usher to telephone him and find out what was happening. This is not always done and the usher was surprised to be asked.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(