🧵Really surprised to see church leaders describing the fallout from abuse within the church as a “stormy season” (ACNA) or “judgment on a denom” (SBC). As though church leaders struggling to respond are somehow the victims here. This seems to me to reveal a mistaken emphasis.
The complexity and cost of abuse response is not a judgment or difficulty for a church to “handle” - but a reality that should remind us of the impossible-to-measure nature of the injury of abuse and the rippling effects of the devastation of betrayed trust.
I will never understand why church leaders don’t scramble to repent & make things right when allegations become public rather than spotlighting how hard it’s been *for the church.*
Imagine surviving abuse, reporting it, only to listen to your church leaders explain how hard & expensive the season of response has been *for them.*
I mean, if, due to parental neglect, a child was injured & needed medical care, how would it land if the parent’s conversation continually revolved around how difficult & expensive that was, & how great they were at parenting to provide it?
I would have a hard time believing the parent genuinely cared about their child’s welfare, would be working to grow their parenting skills, & that their other children would be well tended.
Of course parents might feel distress in that situation, but the inability to prioritize the child’s welfare is alarming. That is how I felt listening to @The_ACNA’s reporting on abuse misconduct responses at the provincial assembly yesterday.
@The_ACNA I do not know if @The_ACNA provincial leadership actually perceives that figuring out proper abuse safeguarding, prevention & abuse response is a minimum standard of care. Dealing w/the fact that it hasn’t been in place is not a storm or trial to endure.
I am posting these thoughts publicly not to frame a narrative, as social media conversation was labeled in yesterday’s address, but b/c people remain unheard & unresponded to. Muffling survivors’ voices is unhelpful & underscores the above church leader-centric approach.
For others interested in the official statements: Wed AM session 1 - Abp Beach addresses these matters for a bit at 1hr43 mark; Bp Guernsey for a bit at 2hr. 33, & Bp Hawkins at length beginning at 2hr 33: anglicanchurch.net/provincial-cou…
I would like to see part 2 of this address where @The_ACNA leaders demonstrate their ability to name not only their own “parental” challenges but also demonstrate compassion & care for their “children” - the immediate survivors & many other survivors in their pews.
I saw yesterday that #SBC members voted to formally apologize to survivors of abuse who took to social media for years & were villainized for it. I hope it does not take @The_ACNA as long to recognize the need for a truly survivor-centric approach.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If @The_ACNA wants to spotlight what they’ve paid for abuse response, it would be good to first acknowledge the untold cost of the abuse itself, largely born by survivors.
Would love to see a financial breakdown of % @The_ACNA is paying to support survivors, make amends & create healthy church cultures, etc vs % going to necessary retroactive costs resulting from institutional failure to safeguard & respond well (investigations).
@The_ACNA I hear the ACNA’s ability to name the amounts they’ve paid, but I am not sure that means they’ve acknowledged the true costs, nor accepted that these costs are not examples of their generosity but of their failure to adequately budget for healthy structures.