Ponder this, folks: These stunning Trump revelations are not seen by most GOP leaders as disqualifying, whether in a party leader or 2024 nominee.

As a result, Judge Luttig tells me, he fears the US faces a period of "protracted democratic instability."

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
At a deeper level, the 1/6 hearings are about the democratic future we want -- about minimizing the possibility of a future marked by chronic instability and political violence.

Scholars of democratic breakdown worry about a US version of "the Troubles":

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Here's what troubles me. It's easy to get seduced by these vivid, damning revelations.

But in the background, even as headlines explode around the country, scores of pro-coup GOP candidacies continue.

What happens after the revelations fade? Maybe this:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Note this: Judge Luttig's foreboding is shared by scholars of democratic breakdown.

I talked to Luttig and Steven Levitsky, co-author of "How Democracies Die."

Both agreed that what GOP leaders do now is critical. Remarkable stuff from both of them:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Greg Sargent

Greg Sargent Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ThePlumLineGS

Jun 16
At today's hearing, the 1/6 committee must ask conservative judge Michael Luttig to speak to the new revelations about the Supreme Court. Given his pedigree, there's an opening to expand the debate to the Ginni Thomas machinations and beyond. Go big, Dems:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Conservative judge Michael Luttig's opening statement is remarkable: He indicts the whole GOP, urging Rs to unambiguously renounce emerging dogma that future election losses will be treated as illegitimate.

He says only Republicans can end the madness:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/… ImageImage
“I don’t think it’s unreasonable for the committee to push Judge Luttig about the growing pile of circumstantial evidence connecting Ginni Thomas to the story in multiple respects."

@steve_vladeck in this piece.

Luttig can reach a certain type of elite:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/… ImageImageImage
Read 4 tweets
Jun 15
This is getting overlooked, but Liz Cheney dropped a crucial hint: She says the next hearing will focus partly on how Trump was told his pressure on Pence was "illegal."

A Cheney source tells me the hearing will likely present new evidence of this:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Trump's pressure on Pence is the key that unlocks this whole scandal. Trump was told he was demanding Pence do something illegal.

There's also evidence Trump was informed his own pressure on Pence was also legally dubious. Remember the Hannity texts:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Here's why this matters:

If Trump was told pressuring Pence might be illegal, it helps build the case that he obstructed an official proceeding with corrupt intent.

I interviewed white collar crime specialist @RDEliason about this. Some clarity here:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Read 4 tweets
Jun 14
I talked to historian @rickperlstein, who puts Trump's big-lie fundraising scam in the context of decades of grift on the right.

"It's impossible to understand where the ideological con ends and the money con begins," Perlstein tells me:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
@rickperlstein "This phenomenon of conservative leaders seeing their constituencies as a pool of marks to squeeze money out of does go back to the beginnings of the conservative takeover of the GOP."

Perlstein traces the grift back to direct mail guru Richard Viguerie:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/… ImageImage
@rickperlstein Trump's grift raised $250 million from GOP voters. But that's not all. We talked about how the stolen election lie has created a social movement.

"These techniques are parallel to the way televangelists win followers and get rich," Perlstein says:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/… ImageImage
Read 5 tweets
Jun 13
Important: The 1/6 committee will demonstrate not just that Trump knew he had lost the election while trying to subvert it, but also that this was a premeditated scheme that he and his allies executed according to plan. That's also key to criminality:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Stop saying Trump and his allies "believed" the big lie.

This was a premeditated, far-reaching plot to keep Trump in power illegitimately, in the full knowledge his loss was procedurally legitimate.

Key to this was declaring victory on election night:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Don't forget: Trump told us *months in advance* that he would claim any delays in the counting of mail ballots showed widespread fraud. He signaled months earlier that he would declare victory prematurely.

That alone shows he didn't "believe" he'd won:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Read 4 tweets
Jun 9
No, Trump didn't "believe" 2020 was stolen. He wasn't "crazy" or a "sore loser." He wasn't just "enjoying the attack on TV." Above all, the 1/6 hearings must cut through the fog of media euphemism. Trump staged an insurrection, and the GOP was complicit:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Brad Raffensperger could be a powerful witness for the 1/6 hearings. He could blow through the absurd media euphemism that Trump was merely exercising what he thought were his "legal options."

“John Dean for the streaming era," Norm Eisen tells me:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/… ImageImage
Trump didn't let the violence rage because he was "angry" or "taking pleasure in watching supporters fight for him."

He essentially weaponized the mob to complete the coup against the United States. Cassidy Hutchinson may be able to testify to this:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/… ImageImage
Read 5 tweets
Jun 8
The Fox News blackout of the 1/6 hearings shows that Republicans benefit from a huge propaganda apparatus that hermetically seals off the GOP electorate from damaging truths. Meanwhile, right wing disinfo pollutes bothsides MSM coverage, helping GOP more:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
"If there is one last human being in DC who clung to the idea that Fox is a center-right journalistic institution with opinion at night, this should be the end of that."

I talked to @danpfeiffer about Fox's 1/6 propaganda and how it will influence MSM:
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
@danpfeiffer "Roger Ailes was a political ad maker. He had this insight that if Fox was a pseudo news organization, it would have greater influence on what other news organizations covered."

@danpfeiffer on how we got to this point. Right wing ref-gaming is central:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(