At a deeper level, the 1/6 hearings are about the democratic future we want -- about minimizing the possibility of a future marked by chronic instability and political violence.
Scholars of democratic breakdown worry about a US version of "the Troubles":
At today's hearing, the 1/6 committee must ask conservative judge Michael Luttig to speak to the new revelations about the Supreme Court. Given his pedigree, there's an opening to expand the debate to the Ginni Thomas machinations and beyond. Go big, Dems: washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Conservative judge Michael Luttig's opening statement is remarkable: He indicts the whole GOP, urging Rs to unambiguously renounce emerging dogma that future election losses will be treated as illegitimate.
“I don’t think it’s unreasonable for the committee to push Judge Luttig about the growing pile of circumstantial evidence connecting Ginni Thomas to the story in multiple respects."
This is getting overlooked, but Liz Cheney dropped a crucial hint: She says the next hearing will focus partly on how Trump was told his pressure on Pence was "illegal."
A Cheney source tells me the hearing will likely present new evidence of this:
@rickperlstein "This phenomenon of conservative leaders seeing their constituencies as a pool of marks to squeeze money out of does go back to the beginnings of the conservative takeover of the GOP."
Perlstein traces the grift back to direct mail guru Richard Viguerie:
@rickperlstein Trump's grift raised $250 million from GOP voters. But that's not all. We talked about how the stolen election lie has created a social movement.
"These techniques are parallel to the way televangelists win followers and get rich," Perlstein says:
Important: The 1/6 committee will demonstrate not just that Trump knew he had lost the election while trying to subvert it, but also that this was a premeditated scheme that he and his allies executed according to plan. That's also key to criminality: washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Stop saying Trump and his allies "believed" the big lie.
This was a premeditated, far-reaching plot to keep Trump in power illegitimately, in the full knowledge his loss was procedurally legitimate.
Key to this was declaring victory on election night:
Don't forget: Trump told us *months in advance* that he would claim any delays in the counting of mail ballots showed widespread fraud. He signaled months earlier that he would declare victory prematurely.
No, Trump didn't "believe" 2020 was stolen. He wasn't "crazy" or a "sore loser." He wasn't just "enjoying the attack on TV." Above all, the 1/6 hearings must cut through the fog of media euphemism. Trump staged an insurrection, and the GOP was complicit: washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
Brad Raffensperger could be a powerful witness for the 1/6 hearings. He could blow through the absurd media euphemism that Trump was merely exercising what he thought were his "legal options."
“John Dean for the streaming era," Norm Eisen tells me:
The Fox News blackout of the 1/6 hearings shows that Republicans benefit from a huge propaganda apparatus that hermetically seals off the GOP electorate from damaging truths. Meanwhile, right wing disinfo pollutes bothsides MSM coverage, helping GOP more: washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
"If there is one last human being in DC who clung to the idea that Fox is a center-right journalistic institution with opinion at night, this should be the end of that."
@danpfeiffer "Roger Ailes was a political ad maker. He had this insight that if Fox was a pseudo news organization, it would have greater influence on what other news organizations covered."
@danpfeiffer on how we got to this point. Right wing ref-gaming is central: