1. Jizyah – The Tax of being Non-Muslim – Part 1 – The Islamic psyche
Did you know that under Islamic rule all non-Muslims, including Hindus had to pay a huge tax just to remain Hindu? A tax just to retain their dharma? A tax of being non-Muslim; a tax of being a Hindu. Read on.
2 It wasn’t a quirk of one Islamic ruler. It is the Islamic law - Shariat. It is not just legal but actually obligated upon a Muslim ruler to implement the Jizyah tax on all their remaining non-Muslim subjects. For this it is important to understand the Islamic psyche first.
3. Dr. Harsh Narain, a scholar of Nyāya-Vaiśeśika, did a wonderful study on Jizyah and what impact it had on the rise of Islam in India in 1990, published by Voice of India. The book was titled ‘Jizyah and the Rise of Islam’.
4. I will use Dr. Narain’s words, & denote them by quotation marks. “According to the Prophet, every child is born in Islam, but its parents make it a non-Muslim.” (Bukhari, I, Kitab al-Janaiz, H.1295) So non-Muslims (Hindus) are usurpers and illegal squatters in Islamic view.
5. “The Qur’an declares the Muslims to be the best community and raised up to guide and govern humanity (Al 'Imran (3) 110), as vice-regents of God on earth (An-Nur (24) 55; an-Naml (27) 62)…” So Muslims are entrusted to take care of the property of God (entire earth).
6. “…and Islam is the chosen religion (Al 'Imran (3) 19, 85; al-Ma'idah (5) 3.), destined to triumph over all other religions. (At-Tawbah (9) 33; al-FatH (48) 28; as 'Saff (61) 9.)” So Muslims are the caretakers; Islam is the chosen religion; and it is destined to win.
7. This is the reason Islamic kingdoms and communities have such a deep conquering mentality. They think it is their right to take away others’ properties and lands. They think it is their duty to conquer the lands and properties of others and they think they will never lose.
8. “The Qur’an also says that the earth belongs to Allah. ‘He causes it to be inherited by whom of His servants He will'. ('Inna 'I-arDa li-' llah-i; yurithu-ha man yyasha'u min 'ibadi-hi' Al-A'raf (7) 128.)
9. “On the basis of it all the Prophet rules that all land belongs to God or himself, the natural corollary being that all land belongs, through God and the Prophet., to the Muslims.” ('A 'Iamu ann al-arDa li 'llah-i wa rasu-ihi'. Bukhari, II, Kitab al-Jihad wa 's-Siyar, H.406.)
10. “This serves to vouchsafe to the Muslims the moral right to grab lands in Jihad from non-Muslims. Ibn Taymiyyah, the 14th-century Muslim jurist-theologian, said that Jihad simply restores lands to the Muslims, who enjoy a kind of Divine right over these.”
11. First point to notice is: according to the Muslim psyche, all non-Muslims, including Hindus are living on Muslim lands and thus are illegal squatters. Thus:
1: They can be evicted;
2. If in any case they are allowed to live, they have to pay rent or tax.
12. The Islamic law commands the Muslims to despise the idol worshippers like Hindus. They are called as ‘najas’. And they are not allowed to be even near the holy Ka’bah.
13. Ayatollah Khomeini wrote: “Eleven things are unclean: urine, excrement, sperm, blood, a dog, a pig, bones, a non-Muslim man and woman, wine, bear, perspiration of the camel that eats filth.” (Bat Ye’or, The Dhimmi)
14. Ayatollah continues: “The whole body of a non-Muslim is unclean, even his hair, his nails, and all secretions of his body. A child below the age of puberty is unclean if his parents and grandparents are not Muslims…”
15. Second point to notice is: We, the non-Muslims (Hindus), are illegal squatters on Muslim lands, and on top of that we are as dirty as pigs and as filthy as wine. So we are committing the sin of dirtying the legal land of Muslims by squatting on them with our filthy bodies.
16. Third important point is that the Quran commands Muslims to convert non-Muslims. It is their sacred duty. Non-Muslims have three choices – conversion to Islam and death by sword, but there is another choice which results from the above reasoning.
17. As a surprise to Muslims, non-Muslims like Hindus didn’t accept the one true religion of Islam easily. They would willingly choose death over conversion to Islam. And in those times, it was simply impossible to kill all Hindus, perhaps the most numerous people on earth.
18. To confront such situations Muslim lawmakers came up with a third solution: Jizyah tax. The Kaffirs could stay non-Muslim, if only for a few years, by paying a hefty tax – the tax of being non-Muslim. It was not different from protection money in today’s world.
19. Jizyah tax solved many problems.
1) It gave the Islamic kingdoms a huge source of revenue without much difficulty.
2) It gave them the satisfaction of insulting Hindus/ non-Muslims. (explained in later threads, how)
3) It encouraged them to convert to Islam.
20. The third point was most important. Jizyah was such a back-breaking tax that over the generations it forced non-Muslims like Hindus to renounce their dharma and accept Islam. Jizyah would humiliate them, impoverish them, and make them hate their dharma.
21. Islamic kingdoms grew religiously & financially through Jizyah. That is how they financed their wars of conquest in other lands by taking Jizyah from non-Muslims. This is how humiliating it was for Hindus to live under Islamic rule. Coming threads will talk on this.
===
*Vaiśeṣika
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. The Practice of Jizyah – Jizyah Series – Part 3
The first implementation of Jizyah was done by the Prophet himself on the Nazranite Christians of present day Yemen. The Nazranites were a great & prosperous culture of the Arabian peninsula of those times.
2. They were forced to pay Jizyah the treaty (protection promise) could be revoked anytime from the side of the Muslims. Thus, after the Prophet’s death, first Caliph Abu Bakr honored the treaty, but the second Caliph Umar revoked it for ‘Arabia could have no non-Muslims’.
3. The Nazranites were forced to leave Arabia and settled in a new town in Kufah outside Arabia, but that part also became Muslim soon after and they were forced to pay Jizyah on them. In a few decades Jizyah was increased many times & Nazranites disappeared from history.
A common trope among Indologists is to declare that all Hindu art can be traced to the Buddhist art which can then be traced to Greek art. Thus Hindu art is simply a copy of Greek art. Nothing can be more false.
2. The motive is to play on chronology; to equate chronology with originality; and to claim that all the Brahmins (as Hindus are called) did was to copy from others. Hence, there is no original Hinduism, and Hindus are open and fair game for conversion to Prophetic Monotheism.
3. These academic theories are belied by evidence. Evidence from Hindu iconography proves these claims are false with the mention of just one text. 'Citra Lakṣana' is an ancient text which is now only extant in its Tibetan translation. A manuscript is available in Thanjavur.
Like most laws in Islam, the tax of Jizyah also arises from the Quran. The verse ordering the imposition of this tax came after the Prophet captured Mecca in 630 C.E. The verse says refusal to convert to Islam translates to a tax.
2. Holy Quran Chapter 9: Verse 29: “Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture…”
3. “…[fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.” Chapter At-Tawbah (9:29) Jizyah thus becomes compulsory. And if non-Muslims have to be ‘tolerated’, then that toleration is monetized with an aside of humiliation of non-Muslims.
How did Islamic kingdoms treat the societies, countries and citizens it defeated? In this thread, we will understand the problem just by looking at a series of paintings depicting non-Muslim women under Islamic rule.
2. The painting is titled “The Slave Dealer” – painted in the year 1919 – by Otto Pilny, a Swiss artist. The slave dealer has just removed the clothes of the non-Muslim slave girl, showing her ‘wares’ to a rich Muslim prince.
3. “The Slave Market” – 1910 – Otto Pilny. A scene from the Arab-Turkish slave market is shown where non-Muslim slave women are sold like cattle in open market, completely naked!
Unfinished Agendas of Political Islam – Case 4 – Spain
Spain is the only country that could completely reverse the Islamization of the country. It threw off the Muslim rule; converted back all remaining Muslims to Christianity.
2. In the annals of Islamic history, Spain is one of the two unsuccessful endeavors of Muslim armies. While India is a defeat, Spain was a reversal. Visigothic Christian Spain came under the rule of Islam under the Umayyad Caliphate in as early as 711 CE.
3. Reclamation of Spain and Portugal (Iberian Peninsula) from Islam and for Christianity is called the Reconquista. It started as early as 718 CE, just seven years after the Islamic conquest of Spain. An independent Christian kingdom called Asturias was created in north Spain.
1. How Greece became Turkey: Anatomy of an Unequal Partition
Unfinished Agendas of Political Islam – Case 3 – Greece & the Balkans vs. Turkey
How Turkey is Islamizing its former Christian colonies after an unequal partition while claiming secular character.
2. What is today Turkey once used to be Greece. Yes! This is the first geographical fact that you need to familiarize yourself with. Turkey was not Turkey. Turkey was called Anatolia/ Asia Minor during pagan and Christian times. While eastern Turkey was Armenia.
3. The original home of Turks is in the steppes of eastern Siberia, somewhere near Lake Baikal. Turks are invaders/ settlers in Turkey. Turks are NOT the original inhabitants of Turkey.