Some of its uses, how to use it, and a little of its history (including its obstetric origin), and the sad fate of Leonardo Gigli.
The Gigli saw is not complicated. It's a wire saw and two handles.
The wire is passed around the bone, and the saw is drawn back and forth, usually with the hands at (roughly) a 90 degree angle.
For larger bones, irrigation can be done to minimize heat from friction.
It has been used for craniotomies (though less common today).
Burr holes are made, and then the saw is used to 'connect the dots'.
This requires specialized wire passing devices and modifications to the blade, which are beyond our scope here. See Brunori et al (1995) for more.
When necessary, the Gigli saw may be used for almost any extremity amputation in place of a powered saw.
It may be preferred for certain foot and ankle amputations and (apparently) revisional hip surgery.
Historically, it has been used in a number of different head and neck resections, as seen in these old diagrams.
I am not sure if it is still used in head and neck surgery, so if anyone wants to chime in, that would be great.
This is a closeup of a modern Gigli saw blade. This one was found on our neurosurgery cart.
The pattern differs from the original design.
If anyone has technical insight on the shape of the blade itself, please reply here.
Gigli first developed the saw in the 1890's to make an osteotomy in the pelvis in cases of obstructed labor.
He wanted to avoid the pubic symphysis, so he went out a bit and created what was called a 'lateralschnitt' (the blue line below). The pelvis would 'spring open'.
Gigli's original saw design. It had ebony handles, and the blade could not be sterilized.
A simple but effective tool for cutting bone. As usual, we'll go over its design, how to use it, and why such a basic device still exists in the surgical toolbox in 2026.
We'll also cover its history and the tragic fate of Leonardo Gigli. (1/ )
The main advantage of the Gigli saw is that it's simple. It's just a wire and 2 hooks.
It doesn't require any power or any other equipment and it can be used in austere environments. If you needed to, you could amputate a leg out in the wilderness with a Gigli saw.
The technique is simple. The saw blade is dragged back and forth to cut the bone. It helps if you keep the momentum going and try to minimize 'stopping'.
Also, try to use most of the length of the blade instead of just the middle part, or this part will overheat and break.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
I found commentary from a 1967 edition of Look magazine that sounds...familiar.
First: junior doctor dissatisfaction and low pay, and UK physicians leaving for elsewhere: (1/ )
It has always been the case that though much of the conversation has to do with pay, that the true causes of discontent are more complex than that. Again, this was noted more than 50 years ago:
It was noted at the time (once again: 1967) that the practice of having doctors in training move around every few months was a problem. Which I'm gathering, remains an issue.
Temporary shunts for vascular trauma have actually been around for >100 yr. The first widespread use likely began with Prof. Tuffier in France, who used them in wounded soldiers in WW1 (1914-18).
The strategy was different though... (1/ )
Formal vascular repair had been described by Carrel, but was impractical in war conditions due to practically all wounds having massive contamination and delayed presentation, which made the vessels more friable and difficult to suture.
Bernheim had a famous quote on this:
Transport times were much longer then, and most of the wounded who were going to die by exsanguination had already done that.
So instead, the main problem of vascular injury at the time was probably thrombosis of the injured vessel with ischemia of the distal tissues.
🧵regarding the technique of 2-handed knot tying.
It's July again, so it's a good time to revisit this 🧵.
2-handed tying is becoming a lost art in surgery, but I believe it is worth learning. We'll start with just the basic steps. Advanced concepts will come later.
(1/)
If you want your first knot to be square, you generally *don't* want to start off with uncrossed threads (L picture).
Instead, it's better to cross the two threads first before you start tying the knot (R picture).
There are 2 ways to 'cross' the threads, which we'll see next.
When I do my initial crossing of threads, you'll see it can be done in one of two ways:
Either the L strand can be on top, or the R stand can be on top.
I can pick either one, but the one I choose will dictate which 'half' of the 2-handed technique I'll need to do first.
With the ASGBI meeting taking place in Edinburgh, it is prudent to revisit my previous 🧵on the deaths in the movie 'Braveheart'.
As you may recall, the goal was to estimate how many deaths were preventable if trauma surgical care was available in Scotland at the time.
(1/)
Once again, we will make some assumptions here:
- rapid 'scoop and run' transport
- casualties present individually and do not overwhelm the system.
The geography of this area provides certain benefits in terms of casualty allocation, as we'll see.
Specifically...in Braveheart, most of the deaths occurred in the Battle of Stirling and the Battle of Falkirk (approximate locations shown here).
As you can see, most of the major trauma centers in Scotland are located close nearby, making the transport more straightforward.