Like most laws in Islam, the tax of Jizyah also arises from the Quran. The verse ordering the imposition of this tax came after the Prophet captured Mecca in 630 C.E. The verse says refusal to convert to Islam translates to a tax.
2. Holy Quran Chapter 9: Verse 29: “Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture…”
3. “…[fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.” Chapter At-Tawbah (9:29) Jizyah thus becomes compulsory. And if non-Muslims have to be ‘tolerated’, then that toleration is monetized with an aside of humiliation of non-Muslims.
4. Different Islamic lawmakers have different opinions on who is eligible for Jizyah. While most believe that only Jews and Christians are eligible for it, and idolaters like Hindus should just be put to death, it was sheer impossible to do that in those times.
5. Imam Malik, one of the four greatest jurists of Islam and one of the Islamic scholars whose tradition – the Maliki school of Islamic jurisprudence – is one of the four great Islamic traditions – he allowed Jizyah for Hindus too.
6. Jizyah is a price for exercise a religion other than Islam. By imposing heavy tax on just being non-Muslim it encourages conversions to Islam. Thus Jizyah is a Jihadic impost. It is a punishment of ‘unbelief’ according to Islam. It is a tool of humiliation of non-Muslims.
7. Only thing that non-Muslims get back from Islamic rulers is a promise of not being exterminated for a certain period of time. It is essentially protection money demanded by religious mafia. Hindus are allowed poor and basic existence under it, but just that.
8. Jizyah is a tool of: 1) Fiscal Jihad – It seeks to destroy financial backbone of non-Muslim society. 2) Humiliation – It seeks to insult non-Muslims to shame them out of their dharma. 3) Islamic Jihad – In long-term it is a tool to slowly turn the non-Muslims towards Islam.
9. Mujaddid-I Alf-I Thani, an Islamic scholar contemporary to Jehangir believed that the primary purpose of Jizyah was the humiliation of the Kafir. It was meant to destroy the dignity of non-Muslims to the point where they are depressed enough to not even wear good clothes.
10. Thani wrote: “'The real purpose of imposing Jizyah on them (the Kafirs) is their humiliation. And the humiliation goes to the extent that for fear of Jizyah they may not put on good dress and live with dignity/in prosperity and they may always live in fear trembling.”
11. This is the theory of Jizyah. In subsequent threads we will look into its history.
Reference for tweet 10: “12. For a detailed discussion of the concept of 'unclean', see Anwar Shah Kashmiri, FayD al-Bari (on Bukhari), I, pp. 361-363.”
===
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Non-Muslims, ‘protected’ by paying Jizyah, were called Dhimmis/ Jimmis. Muslims, taking tax, were called ‘Jimmedar’. This is the origin of word ‘Jimmedar’; it means a Muslim who is responsible for collecting religious tax from Hindus.
2. Dhimmis/ Zimmis were not citizens. They had no rights. Neither political nor fundamental. They were never appointed to any position of power. They could never exercise voting of any kind. They could never lead an army.
3. Many disabilities were inflicted on Dhimmis. They could not: 1) Couldn’t build new temples. 2) Couldn’t repair temples destroyed by Muslims. 3) Couldn’t sound bells in their temples to inconvenience Muslims. 4) Couldn’t display their dharmic symbols openly.
1. The Practice of Jizyah – Jizyah Series – Part 3
The first implementation of Jizyah was done by the Prophet himself on the Nazranite Christians of present day Yemen. The Nazranites were a great & prosperous culture of the Arabian peninsula of those times.
2. They were forced to pay Jizyah the treaty (protection promise) could be revoked anytime from the side of the Muslims. Thus, after the Prophet’s death, first Caliph Abu Bakr honored the treaty, but the second Caliph Umar revoked it for ‘Arabia could have no non-Muslims’.
3. The Nazranites were forced to leave Arabia and settled in a new town in Kufah outside Arabia, but that part also became Muslim soon after and they were forced to pay Jizyah on them. In a few decades Jizyah was increased many times & Nazranites disappeared from history.
A common trope among Indologists is to declare that all Hindu art can be traced to the Buddhist art which can then be traced to Greek art. Thus Hindu art is simply a copy of Greek art. Nothing can be more false.
2. The motive is to play on chronology; to equate chronology with originality; and to claim that all the Brahmins (as Hindus are called) did was to copy from others. Hence, there is no original Hinduism, and Hindus are open and fair game for conversion to Prophetic Monotheism.
3. These academic theories are belied by evidence. Evidence from Hindu iconography proves these claims are false with the mention of just one text. 'Citra Lakṣana' is an ancient text which is now only extant in its Tibetan translation. A manuscript is available in Thanjavur.
1. Jizyah – The Tax of being Non-Muslim – Part 1 – The Islamic psyche
Did you know that under Islamic rule all non-Muslims, including Hindus had to pay a huge tax just to remain Hindu? A tax just to retain their dharma? A tax of being non-Muslim; a tax of being a Hindu. Read on.
2 It wasn’t a quirk of one Islamic ruler. It is the Islamic law - Shariat. It is not just legal but actually obligated upon a Muslim ruler to implement the Jizyah tax on all their remaining non-Muslim subjects. For this it is important to understand the Islamic psyche first.
3. Dr. Harsh Narain, a scholar of Nyāya-Vaiśeśika, did a wonderful study on Jizyah and what impact it had on the rise of Islam in India in 1990, published by Voice of India. The book was titled ‘Jizyah and the Rise of Islam’.
How did Islamic kingdoms treat the societies, countries and citizens it defeated? In this thread, we will understand the problem just by looking at a series of paintings depicting non-Muslim women under Islamic rule.
2. The painting is titled “The Slave Dealer” – painted in the year 1919 – by Otto Pilny, a Swiss artist. The slave dealer has just removed the clothes of the non-Muslim slave girl, showing her ‘wares’ to a rich Muslim prince.
3. “The Slave Market” – 1910 – Otto Pilny. A scene from the Arab-Turkish slave market is shown where non-Muslim slave women are sold like cattle in open market, completely naked!
Unfinished Agendas of Political Islam – Case 4 – Spain
Spain is the only country that could completely reverse the Islamization of the country. It threw off the Muslim rule; converted back all remaining Muslims to Christianity.
2. In the annals of Islamic history, Spain is one of the two unsuccessful endeavors of Muslim armies. While India is a defeat, Spain was a reversal. Visigothic Christian Spain came under the rule of Islam under the Umayyad Caliphate in as early as 711 CE.
3. Reclamation of Spain and Portugal (Iberian Peninsula) from Islam and for Christianity is called the Reconquista. It started as early as 718 CE, just seven years after the Islamic conquest of Spain. An independent Christian kingdom called Asturias was created in north Spain.