Colin Yeo Profile picture
Jun 20 6 tweets 2 min read
1. How does the Refugee Convention work? As part of #RefugeeWeek, here's our series 60 second explainer videos, starting with the convention itself
2. What does "well-founded fear" mean?
3. What sort of treatment might amount to being persecuted?
4. What are the reasons why someone must be at risk of being persecuted? twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
5. How can refugee status be lost?
And you can access and share the playlist on YouTube as well: youtube.com/playlist?list=…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Colin Yeo

Colin Yeo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ColinYeo1

Jun 21
1. So, what's *really* going on with the UK asylum system? Here's a deep dive briefing for #RefugeeWeek2022 and five key charts. 🧵

I like charts.
2. First, number of asylum claims. They've gone up, but only very recently and they are still way below the peak of 2002. Most arrivals are by small boat now, though. Image
3. Next, success rate. Asylum seekers or refugees? Both. The success rate is the highest it has been since the 1980s: 75% of all claims for asylum succeed, and that is before appeals. And it is higher for some nationalities, like Afghans, Iranians and Syrians. Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 20
1. To start off #RefugeeWeek2022, I've answered some of the classic legal questions around refugees and the Refugee Convention.More detail in the linked blog post at the end 🧵
2. What is the Refugee Convention anyway?
3. What is the legal definition of a refugee?
Read 10 tweets
Jun 14
1. Those of us who oppose the Rwanda plan are sometimes asked what our alternative is. The idea that the only possible response to small boat arrivals is to ship some of them to Rwanda is self evidently absurd. There are plenty of alternatives. 🧵
2. We can just... cope. France and Germany accept far, far more asylum claims than we do. So far we've welcomed 70,000 refugees from Ukraine and 114,000 from Hong Kong in the last year or so. That's good, and it shows that capacity and numbers aren't the issues here.
3. Dangerous journeys are a problem. We've turned a blind eye to over 24,000 dying on Mediterranean routes since 2014 so, frankly, it seems odd that some commentators now profess to be worried about the Channel. But we could offer safe routes and asylum processing in France.
Read 14 tweets
Jun 13
Court of Appeal living Rwanda appeal judgment live now. Wish they'd start with the outcome then explain...
Reminder that the court is only considering whether the claimants should stay in the UK or be removed to Rwanda pending the final outcome of the challenge to be heard in a few weeks' time.
At this rate I'm not sure the giving of this judgment will end before the flight takes off...
Read 11 tweets
Jun 12
Was thinking of writing a piece on the history of UK governments trying to offload migrants or potential migrants to other countries. Possible examples so far…
Slave trade was massive scale human transportation, obviously. Not sure it meets my criteria of “migrants” since the people involved hadn’t previously and didn’t want to move.
The (disastrous) project to settle Sierra Leone and establish Freetown would count, though, I think.
Read 10 tweets
Jun 8
1. The Rwanda scheme is an example of why it is important to have access to a lawyer. It's because the law will not be applied without us. A quick explainer.
2. There are very strong legal arguments that the entire scheme is unlawful at a system level, in the sense that no-one could lawfully be removed under the scheme because it would breach international and therefore domestic law.
3. Even if those system level legal arguments are wrong, i.e. rejected by the courts, there are very strong legal arguments that removal to Rwanda is unlawful in individual cases for a wide variety of individuals.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(