Joel Baden Profile picture
Jun 21 11 tweets 3 min read
#Numbers 19:11-22

Corpse impurity

One of the most severe types of impurity in the priestly system, but also one that demonstrates - along with impurity from childbirth and sex - that becoming impure isn’t just not bad, it’s also sometimes required.
Here we also see that impurity is transmitted not just by contact, but even through the air, at least in this severe case: just being in a tent with a corpse makes you impure for seven days, same as if you touch a corpse directly.
Procedurally it’s again similar to other severe priestly impurities, with a multi-stage process - elsewhere on the seventh and eighth days, here on the third and seventh. Point is, as a part of the impurity system this is all recognizable.
But there are a couple of unique features. Here, the concern seems to be entirely for the individual Israelite, and how he is to become pure - there is no mention in this chapter of any sacrifice offered to purify the sanctuary, as we always had before. Why not?
I don’t think it’s because this ritual is imagined to take place in a Temple-less world. It is, rather, because P is here doing what it does all over the place: assuming that you understand how things work now, such that you don’t need to be told basic stuff again.
Of course you have to offer a sacrifice when your purification process is complete. And the text still recognizes the existence of the sanctuary, and the way that impurity affects it: “he has defiled YHWH’s sanctuary.” That’s still the main issue.
The second strange thing here, perhaps even more prominently, is the placement of the law. Why here, and not back in Lev 11–15 with the rest of the impurities? For a long time I assumed this was because it was a later layer of P. I’ve been convinced otherwise.
It was, of course, @lianemfeldman who convinced me, because whom else would I implicitly trust on the P ritual material? As she points out, this moment, following the decree against the generation of the spies and after the Korah episode, is Israel’s first encounter with death.
“What about Nadav and Avihu?” Good question, you. And the answer is: there was no such thing as impurity when they died. That happened in Lev 10, and impurity laws are given first in Lev 11.
All the other impurities occur in a natural living community, even one that is being brought by YHWH’s own hand through the wilderness. But I can imagine that death was not really on the table until here. But now, both generally and specifically, it absolutely is.
So here again we see, as @lianemfeldman continually shows us, that the laws and the narrative of P are inseparably intertwined, not just textually but conceptually, building off and reacting to each other.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joel Baden

Joel Baden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoelBaden

Jun 20
#Numbers 19:1-10

The red heifer

Truly one of the weirdest obsessions of the millennialist movement, but it’s also true that, as with some other stuff in P, there’s no particularly good explanation for why this is a thing. Why a red heifer? Why a heifer at all? Who knows.
Ritually, it’s no so different from the one for cleansing the person with skin disease back at the beginning of Lev 14. Same basic ingredients: blood, hyssop, cedar, crimson. Same idea: mix it all and you get a mixture that cleans not the sanctuary but the actual person.
Though we haven’t even gotten in this section to what this mixture cleanses a person from, we know from its very existence and makeup that it’s gotta be something serious. This is high-level impurity we’re dealing with here.
Read 5 tweets
May 25
#Numbers 16:4-11

Moses responds to Korah

Essentially a single continuous speech from Moses, entirely ignoring Dathan and Abiram, no surprise there, and focusing on Korah and his band of 250 Israelites. And Moses poses a challenge that should be all too familiar.
You think all Israelites are the same when it comes to matters of holiness? Why don't you come by the sanctuary with some coals and incense and try offering it? I don't remember what happended the last time someone tried offering incense just for funsies, do you?
At this point, we the readers should know pretty much exactly what's going to happen here. (We also know for sure that we're in P, if somehow we didn't realize it already.)
Read 9 tweets
Dec 1, 2021
#Leviticus 25:42

Israelite slavery (3)

Why can’t an indebted Israelite be treated like a slave? Because he’s already enslaved - not to another Israelite, or any other human, but to YHWH. A slave can’t have two masters, and YHWH has made his claim.
The basis of YHWH’s claim is simple: I took them out of Egypt, so they’re mine. They were slaves to Pharaoh, but YHWH redeemed them - in the technical sense of the word: he effectively purchased them, just with force rather than with money.
The logic here is clear: what makes Israel un-enslaveable is their having been redeemed from Egypt by YHWH. Everyone who didn’t go through that experience - everyone who isn’t Israel - isn’t subject to the same prohibition on being enslaved. (As will be clear momentarily.)
Read 6 tweets
Nov 14, 2021
The Bible, like every text, can’t communicate without a reader. And every reader reads from their own context. So you can’t say “the Bible means X” - you can only say “I read the Bible as meaning X.” And preferably understand why - the context of your reading.
As all texts need to be interpreted to be read, so too every reading is therefore interpretation. Modern readers interpret for their own world and context. So too Luther. So too Jesus. So too the very first readers of the text in antiquity. None of these is the “right” reading.
“How the original Israelite audience would have understood it” isn’t the “correct” interpretation of the text. It’s just the oldest. Privileging it over the 2000 years of interpretation that followed is a very particular modern intellectual stance that should be interrogated.
Read 8 tweets
Nov 12, 2021
Lev 25:18-22

Magical sabbatical year crops

Worried about how you're going to manage to eat enough in the sabbatical year, when you can't sow or harvest? Don't you fear: YHWH will make the sixth year miraculously abundant! Three years' worth in one! Well, that's reassuring.
It's utopian, obviously. But that's actually a pretty big deal, and sort of wild, when you think about it. Here's what is presented to us as law - don't sow or harvest in the seventh year - but which can't ever have actually been practiced, or even imagined to be practiced.
We might think of this through a somewhat skeptical lens as H writing from a time when none of these good things happened, and Israel was in some trouble, and that could be blamed, in fact, on Israel not having followed these laws, which were given so long ago.
Read 4 tweets
Nov 9, 2021
#Leviticus 25:8-12

The jubilee year

Every fifty years, we get the jubilee: not just a year of rest like the sabbatical (though that too), but a year of restoration: everyone returns to their lands and to their people. What a nice biblical idea! Except it isn’t (biblical).
The big announcement of the fiftieth year is the restoration, or dror (דרור). This word comes to Hebrew, and the Bible, from the Akkadian andurarum, which is the same basic concept, just at the whim of the king rather than set on the calendar.
Always good to have the reminder that so much of what is known as biblical law is in fact just borrowed ancient Near Eastern practice. (You may think that these are God’s laws, but if they are, God nicked them from Mesopotamia.)
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(