Kamil Galeev Profile picture
Jun 21, 2022 16 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Brat-2 and the Russian state cult

The CEO of Russian aerospace (& missiles producing) state company Roskosmos Rogozin published this video in his telegram channel РОГОZИН. It may look weird for foreigners but Russians understand this allusion very well (not a thread)
In his video Rogozin is basically threatening the outer world with the nuclear war, while reading some silly childish sounding poem. For context let's have a look on another video, also from his Telegram channel t.me/rogozin_do. Russian fighters are reading the same poem
Pretty much every modern Russian can easily understand the reference. It is a poem from the Brat-2 movie, where Russian mafia members are departing to the US to take revenge against an American criminal boss
The poem is repeated twice. First the protagonist visited a school in Moscow and heard a child reading it. He kinda caught the vibe
Later, he got to Chicago and found a skyscraper where his enemy's office is located. While climbing there through a fire escape he's reading the same poem by heart
Here you can see the entire scene with Brat's revenge. Yeah, it looks kinda like a trashy criminal movie. No wonder so many underestimated its cultural impact in Russia. For Russia it's not a random film. It's the integral part of the state cult
Yes, part of intelligentsia mocked the Brat movies as trashy and tasteless. I personally like this parody the best But while the part of intelligentsia viewed them ironically, the wider masses took them unironically as a source of the eternal wisdom
Why would Brat movies play such an important role? They kinda resonated with the national vibe. By 2000 Russians felt humiliated and wanted revenge. It was the spirit of age and not the initiative of Putin as many think. His predecessor Primakov had also tried to play this card
NB: A very important detail. While a movie is about a Russian bandit's revenge against the American criminal boss, he doesn't kill his enemy in the end. He visits him, massacres his workers and henchmen, but doesn't kill him. His real goal is to demonstrated his superiority
Whom do two Brats kill then? Well, as I said, Chicago criminal boss' henchmen and workers, the random folk. But also the Ukrainian bandits. Their death is also portrayed as a sort of ethnic/national revenge. Which they deserved by refusing to accept a Muscovite as their brother
I am very much inclined to think that the Brat-2 movie is a reflection of the Russian ruling class feelings and the worldview. That's why they were advertised and propagandised so massively, endorsed by the state-controlled media, especially in the context of the war with Ukraine
If we analyse Kremlin's motivations through the Brat-2 lenses, what they would look like?

The archenemy is the Chicago mafia boss (DC elites). But our goal is not to destroy them. Our goal is to inflict a defeat upon them, see their fear and humiliate them. To restore our pride
On our way to meet our archenemy however, we will have to kill tons of folk who may not be complicit in his crimes (like his night club personnel) but just happen to be there and stay on our way to:

1. take money from the nightclub office
2. more importantly, restore our pride
If we view the war in Ukraine through the Brat-2 lenses the fault of Ukrainians consists largely in being there, standing on our way to meet the true boss and restore our pride. The war in Ukraine is primarily a leverage to get a better negotiating position with the DC
That is not to say that Moscow wouldn't attack Ukraine if not for its conflict with the US. Moscow never truly recognised the independence of Ukraine and viewed post-Soviet states as breakaway provinces to be saved from themselves. Z-war is a war of the imperial restoration
But Kremlin also views Z-war as a proxy war against the US, which is really fought to take revenge for the prior humiliation. In this context Ukrainians are more of misfortunate fooled guys, whose real fault is just staying on a way of a rightful avenger. End of 🧵

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kamil Galeev

Kamil Galeev Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kamilkazani

Jun 14
On Trump's birthday

Let's have a look at these four guys. Everything about them seems to be different. Religion. Ideology. Political regime. And yet, there is a common denominator uniting all:

Xi - 71 years old
Putin - 72 years old
Trump - 79 years old
Khamenei - 86 years old Image
Irrespectively of their political, ideological, religious and whatever differences, Russia, China, the United States, Iran are all governed by the old. Whatever regime, whatever government they have, it is the septuagenarians and octogenarians who have the final saying in it.
This fact is more consequential than it seems. To explain why, let me introduce the following idea:

Every society is a multiracial society, for every generation is a new race

Although we tend to imagine them as cohesive, all these countries are multigenerational -> multiracial
Read 7 tweets
Jun 7
In 1927, when Trotsky was being expelled from the Boslhevik Party, the atmosphere was very and very heated. One cavalry commander met Stalin at the stairs and threatened to cut off his ears. He even pretended he is unsheathing he sabre to proceed

Stalin shut up and said nothing
Like obviously, everyone around could see Stalin is super angry. But he still said nothing and did nothing

Which brings us to an important point:

Nobody becomes powerful accidentally
If Joseph Stalin seized the absolute control over the Communist Party, and the Soviet Union, the most plausible explanation is that Joseph Stalin is exercising some extremely rare virtues, that almost nobody on the planet Earth is capable of

Highly virtuous man, almost to the impossible level
Read 7 tweets
Jun 1
Growing up in Russia in the 1990s, I used to put America on a pedestal. It was not so much a conscious decision, as the admission of an objective fact of reality. It was the country of future, the country thinking about the future, and marching into the future. Image
And nothing reflected this better than the seething hatred it got from Russia, a country stuck in the past, whose imagination was fully preoccupied with the injuries of yesterday, and the phantasies of terrible revenge, usually in the form of nuclear strike. Image
Which, of course, projected weakness rather than strength

We will make a huuuuuuge bomb, and drop it onto your heads, and turn you into the radioactive dust, and you will die in agony, and we will be laughing and clapping our hands

An old man yelling at clouds Image
Read 9 tweets
May 2
Fake jobs are completely normal & totally natural. The reason is: nobody understands what is happening and most certainly does not understand why. Like people, including the upper management have some idea of what is happening in an organisation, and this idea is usually wrong.
As they do not know and cannot know causal relations between the input and output, they just try to increase some sort of input, in a hope for a better output, but they do not really know which input to increase.
Insiders with deep & specific knowledge, on the other hand, may have a more clear & definite idea of what is happening, and even certain, non zero degree of understanding of causal links between the input and output

(what kind of input produces this kind of output)
Read 6 tweets
Apr 12
There is a common argument that due process belongs only to citizens

Citizens deserve it, non citizens don’t

And, therefore, can be dealt with extrajudicially

That is a perfectly logical, internally consistent position

Now let’s think through its implications
IF citizens have the due process, and non-citizens don’t

THEN we have two parallel systems of justice

One slow, cumbersome, subject to open discussion and to appeal (due process)

Another swift, expedient, and subject neither to a discussion nor to an appeal (extrajudicial)
And the second one already encompasses tens of millions of non citizens living in the United States, legal and illegal, residents or not.

Now the question would be:

Which system is more convenient for those in power?

Well, the answer is obvious
Read 10 tweets
Apr 5
I have recently read someone comparing Trump’s tariffs with collectivisation in the USSR. I think it is an interesting comparison. I don’t think it is exactly the same thing of course. But I indeed think that Stalin’s collectivisation offers an interesting metaphor, a perspective to think aboutImage
But let’s make a crash intro first

1. The thing you need to understand about the 1920s USSR is that it was an oligarchic regime. It was not strictly speaking, an autocracy. It was a power of few grandees, of the roughly equal rank.
2. Although Joseph Stalin established himself as the single most influential grandee by 1925, that did not make him a dictator. He was simply the most important guy out there. Otherwise, he was just one of a few. He was not yet the God Emperor he would become later.
Read 30 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(