1) Finally, seems IMF progm being shortly revived, wth more taxes.
GDP growth to slow down-may be 3%- more increase in petrol prices & utilities- significantly higher inflation may be 15%. In this 🧵 I cover 2 strategic options country has to choose n/1 dawn.com/news/1696100/l…
2) With #IMF revival, default averted in near term, but economy to remain in #ICU . How will the govt address fiscal & currnt acnt deficits, ensure servicing of huge stock of external debt, improve forex reserves, enhance exports & restore investor confidence? n/2
3) How will the energy crisis, its mounting debt, SOE crisis be addressed? How will we improve our human development indicators?
Above 3 questions require major change in mindset wth regard to governance & public financial management . n/3.
4) Pakn has 2 choices: Option 1. A roadmap of structural reforms- tht must entail major restructuring/reduction in size of its govts, major privatisation & deregulation & governance based on principle of accountability for outcomes tht can address its structural imbalances n/4
5) Option 2- continue status quo/business as usual- remain on pain killers & in ICU- This simply is no option. Wud mean further deterioration in fiscl, extrnal accnt imbalances & mounting of debt to level tht even an IMF progrm will be insufficient to rescue us from default 5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) Massive criticism & heartburn over performance evaluation of Ministers introduced by @ImranKhanPTI - reflects following realities a) Despite serious limitations & weaknesses- it is an excellent 1st step to improve performance & service delivery; 1/4 gulfnews.com/world/asia/pak…
2) b) politically, was highly counterproductive for a coalition govt wth small majority- already facing risk of impending no confidence; c) no brainer- when you reward 10 out of 55, remaining 45 will deeply resent & fight back; 2/5
3) d) no matter how good or bad was the performance management system, it had huge risk of annoying large number of non performing ministers- thus creating huge risk for further dissensions in an already divided party; 3/5
1) Pak Steel became profitable frm 2002/3 to 2007/8, not because of any special mgt skills, but because steel prices continously went up in that period, & everone in steel, from Tatas to Mitals made huge profits.
2) Global financial crisis caused the steel prices to crash in 2008/09 which mgt and board cud not understand. They kept importing pig iron, as they were used to increase in prices, with result, they incurred loss of 28 biln, wiping out all profits made in previous 5 yrs.
3) It was simply stupid to have steel trading busines- steel commodity in public sector. If this was privatised in 2006 it wud have saved over Rs. 500 biln worth of tax payers money. If this investmnt was facilitated in pvt sector, it cud have benefited the economy by 10 times