Fell asleep thinking about how I feel about the label “woman” the way I feel about the label “bisexual” which is that they’re the best options for me while also being burdened with a lot of baggage that I find frustrating.
I have spent a lot of time thinking about my gender — probably more than most people who ultimately decide that they’re cis — and for me it always comes back to: I don’t feel dysphoria about my body, I dress in a feminine way, I feel most comfortable with the pronoun she.
To the extent that I personally have any gender trouble it’s that there’s there’s this cultural fiction of A Woman™️ floating around who doesn’t bear much resemblance to me — which was, of course, what my book ultimately wrestled with (#BuyMyBook). sealpress.com/titles/lux-alp…
But whenever I’ve thought about communicating that disconnect through a bespoke gender, I get no relief. I tried using they/them pronouns at one point, I considered IDing as a non-binary woman. I’m very happy for all the people who find comfort in these frames, I did not.
I ultimately concluded that a lot of my tension with womanhood could (somewhat) be resolved through understanding myself as a queer woman, but… that leads me to the whole baggage of being a “bisexual,” which, oof.
I’m a bisexual because I’m attracted to multiple genders. Fine.
And I come back to bisexual because it’s the best of a bunch of bad options — for me it’s def better than pansexual or multisexual or omnisexual or what have you — and because again, my problem is fundamentally *other people’s ideas of who a bi woman is* more than anything else.
Anyway in the grand scheme of things this is all kinda minor, but it’s also just… a perpetual frustration, the way we load all these labels with an idea of a person rather than accepting that they’re rough descriptions of a categories that contain multitudes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If I were a doctor in a state that outlaws abortion I would let all my patients know that I have the ability to prescribe misoprostol for menstrual regulation, which is not an abortion since it’s merely bringing someone’s period back before they even have a positive preg test.
Unlike mifepristone — which is less heavily regulated than before, but still requires providers to jump through dumb hoops — misoprostol is an ulcer medication that is just like any other prescription medication, AND CAN BE PRESCRIBED OFF LABEL.
Menstrual regulation is not abortion — how could it be if you aren’t even testing positive on a pregnancy test?? — but instead exists in the Schrödinger’s cat space of emergency contraception. Is your period late because of pregnancy or just because it’s late? No one knows.
The other thing about vasectomies is that they are a solution for people who don’t want to get *other* people pregnant. They are not a solution for people who don’t want to get pregnant, not least because *it is possible, even likely, that people will lie about having them*.
There’s no solution for lack of abortion access other than “getting abortion access”
Instead of vasectomies we could be talking about the fact that @AidAccessUSA does advance provision of abortion pills — meaning you’re not currently pregnant and are getting them just in case — to people in ALL 50 STATES, and that abortion pills last at least 2 years.
VASECTOMIES ARE NOT A SOLUTION TO LACK OF ABORTION ACCESS
A) Vasectomies are not always reversible — any respectable provider will tell you they should be considered permanent — and reversals are incredibly expensive!
B) Lots of people who wind up needing abortions *wanted to get pregnant in the first place*.
I cannot express enough how much I LOATHE people who just want to be all "well here is some doom" without even an attempt at a fucking solution
Someone QTed a tweet of mine about how you can order misoprostol online without a prescription being all "don't expect that to not be tracked!!" and like... what is the fucking point of saying that if you're not pointing people to internet security resources????
I never want to minimize the legal risks of self-managed abortion, but I also *really* don't want to snuff out the tiny spark of hope that people have in this darkest of hours.
I've said this before but I really don't think many of you understand how unloved and unprotected the right to abortion was
I don't want to understate the magnitude of losing Roe, but at the same time, it's important to understand that in many ways this is a dotting of is and crossing of ts on a letter written long long ago
So many people — even people who ostensibly believe in a right to abortion! — have spent the past few years looking away as the right to abortion was whittled away, have kept abortion stigmatized, have barely said the *word* abortion.
It never fails to astonish me how many people would rather envision all the new and horrible ways in which they might be oppressed going forward rather than all the exciting and important ways they might resist oppression
This comes up a lot with discussions of SMA. *Obviously* the best (and, I would argue, only acceptable) situation is full, unrestricted access to abortion as needed throughout pregnancy, with the service provided in GYN offices and hospitals everywhere + OTC pills. HOWEVER.
Given the current political landscape, I think it's incredibly important to remind people that even when abortion is criminalized, abortion pills offer *many pepole* a safe way to terminate a pregnancy; and that the "coat hanger" and "back alley" are things of the past.