Me Profile picture
Jun 24 5 tweets 2 min read
Supreme Court dismisses Zakia Jafri plea challenging the SIT clean chit given to Narendra Modi and others in the 2002 Gujarat riots. SC also noted that the proceedings were pursued for an ulterior motive, & that all those involved in the abuse of process need to be prosecuted.
Supreme Court dismisses criminal conspiracy allegation in 2002 riots: “There is no indication about the perceivable link to show hatching of criminal conspiracy at the highest levels for causing and precipitating mass violence across the State against the minority community."
Supreme Court has observed that a combined effort was made by disgruntled officials of Gujarat state (read SanjeevBhatt, PradeepSharma) along with others (read Teesta, MukulSinha) to sensationalise by making false revelations. It also rejected evidentiary value of Tehelka sting.
Rejecting #ZakiaJafri plea, & calling out the plea as well as 2002 riots cottage industry as those with ulterior motive who wanted to keep the pot boiling, Supreme Court has firmly dismissed the two decades of campaign of calumny against @narendramodi .
While one can sympathise with #ZakiaJafri for losing her husband in a horrific manner, she just became a tool in the hands of anti-Modi brigade. She knew well that her husband faced a similar attack during a riot in Con-ruled Guj & s/he didnt blame the CM.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Me

Me Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @semubhatt

Jun 26
Supreme Court has reaffirmed no high-level conspiracy behind the 2002 riots & has called out a devious ploy 'to keep the pot boiling for ulterior design.'
My take, it is time for the nation to accept the verdict & learn not to fall prey to fake narratives.…
During its 10-yr rule, UPA govt worked relentlessly to pin blame of 2002 riots on @narendramodi . So did, several NGOs, activists, media. Fictional tales were created to blame Modi, but those fictions first got junked by the SC-appointed SIT & now by the SC in Zakia judgment.
Zakia had said, I know in my heart that Modi murdered my husband. SC verdict calling Zakia's petition devoid of merits & upholding Modi's innocence, is therefore extremely important. SC also noted that some ppl need to be in docks for misuse of legal process for ulterior motive,
Read 23 tweets
Jun 23
A Gujarati, MKG, won India freedom (that's what the dynasty ecosystem says). Another Gujarati, Sardar, united India. The least ppl from other states can do is join the forces to protect India, no?
Btw, Manekshaw's parents had moved to Punjab from Gujarat, so he was a Gujju too.
Are people going to hold it against Gujjus that we produce more leaders than foot soldiers?
Gen Rajendrasinhji Jadeja, from the royal family of Nawanagar (Ranjitsinhji/Duleepsinhji), was the Indian Army's 1st Chief of Army Staff & 2nd Commander-in-Chief. He was also the first Indian officer to be posted as Military Attaché in DC in 1945.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 25, 2021
It is not okay to abuse Shami coz of his faith.
It is not okay to highlight only the abuses to Shami, coz Kohli received as many, if not more.
It is not okay to highlight abuse received by one cricketer by some, but ignore firecrackers by some of his coreligionists in India.
"Some" is the keyword here that everyone should notice.
Hey @INCIndia , this genius accepted that only 'bhakts' get disheartened by the Indian team's loss! This, when many label Congress as anti-national! Have you completely blurred the line between being anti-Modi & anti-India? Or are you getting paid by BJP IT cell for self goals?
Read 14 tweets
Oct 22, 2021
I am of the opinion that some Acts are too stringent wrt bails & that the system is screwed up. I thought this article might be interesting. Nope. It's only about one celebrity son, & starts off with, "the charges are clearly trumped up." Why do we even need courts @tehseenp ?
“Broadly what we are doing is imposing restrictions on the path of grant of bail.” Do you remember who had said this @tehseenp ? UPA's HM while defending the draconian UAPA, who had to himself wait for bail last year (karma, huh?).
Read 4 tweets
Oct 22, 2021
I had tweeted earlier about bigger fights; in that context, see this too. You can't tolerate a few ads without bindis but are okay with the name of a genocidal maniac plastered around the country? Why not peacefully demand name change?
I am not into civilisational/religious battles, so this issue troubles me even less than what Ram temple did. In fact, a small % of Hindus care about this, largely aware & awake thx to that b**** glorifying him. They too are not demanding change even where BJP is in power.
I mean no disrespect to anyone as everyone has a different opinion. Also, those who do something are better than those who do nothing for that issue. I am just expressing my amusement at the battles that are being picked.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!