Our system of law has always been adversarial, which means judicial officers (JOs) mainly listen but do not investigate or examines witnesses. The #SmallClaimsCourt Act changes this by giving the adjudicators broad investigative powers. Are we creating a monster? A thread 🧵
Sections 19 and 32(4) of the SCC Act give the court wide inquisitorial powers which include summoning witnesses, requiring production of documents, researching on its own, and examining witnesses on anything they consider relevant to determine the suit.
In addition, Section 17 gives the adjudicator wide discretion on what procedures to adopt in determination of matters as long as those procedures abide by the principles of natural justice
It's arguable that these inquisitorial powers are necessary to cut through strict law of evidence hurdles and arrive at the truth, in a way that provides access to justice to all the users of the court, whether it is a publicly listed company or a mama mboga.
But the question is, since several aspects of the #SmallClaimsCourt remain adversarial, will giving adjudicators these inquisitorial powers create a Frankenstein system of law that gets out of control? Is it possible to successfully merge these two systems of law?
Our common law system allows for decisions to be made at the court's discretion. The danger of an inquisitorial JO in this common law system is that the JO can become prejudiced or the litigants can perceive the JO as biased in their decision making.
This then creates an avenue for challenging the decisions and potentially moves the #SmallClaimsCourt further and further away from its objective of ensuring access to justice. But I propose that there is a solution...
The #SmallClaimsCourt is in urgent need of practice directions to clarify the situations where the court is allowed to become inquisitorial. This would give all parties clear expectations when the court puts on its investigator hat.
In conclusion, I believe that the hybrid inquisitorial and adversarial system in the #SmallClaimsCourt is not a monster, at least not yet. But in the absence of practice directions the danger remains in the horizon.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In less than 60 days you have filed your claim, served it, filed a return of service, attended court, made arguments, court has ruled in your favour, and you've extracted the decree in the #SmallClaimsCourt. But then the debtor tells you "I have no money". What next? 4 tips 🧵
1. Negotiate a payment plan. It's never great to receive a judgment award in bits, but it's far better than not to receive it at all. Formalize it through a formal agreement and incentivize early payment with a reducing balance interest clause in the agreement.
2. Accept less than the judgment as full payment. The easiest candidates to let go of are court awarded interest and costs, but you might also consider accepting a portion of the principal judgment if in your case a bird in hand is worth two in the bush.
Have you been sued in the #SmallClaimsCourt? Here is a short thread on my 100% full proof way to have the case thrown out of the SCC.
(🤫 don't tell everyone)
I'll start by saying (obviously) this is not legal advice, BUT here is a tactic that defense lawyers have used with great efficacy to have claims thrown out.
Just follow these 4 simple steps
1. Once you receive the claim, file a response denying and then ... here is the secret sauce... make a counter-claim for an amount of over KSh. 1m. The exact figure is not important, as long as you attach some "evidence" that the counterclaim has basis.
Could the Small Claims Courts be the reason insurance companies raised their premiums on motor vehicle insurance?
A short thread...
Over 8 months last year, the Small Claims Courts issued judgment of almost half a billion, of which 190 million was paid out in civil claims (mostly by insurance companies)
This came a huge shock to insurance companies who are used to having civil claims languish for an average of three years in the Magistrates Courts beforw judgment.
By December 31st 2021, I had filed or defended over 50 cases in the Small Claims Court 🧑⚖️
Here are my top 20 tips on how to be successful in this court.
A thread ✍️
1. Confirm that the court has jurisdiction before claiming or responding. Claims such as defamation, ownership/possession of land, employment, and malicious prosecution are excluded from Small Claims. S.13(5) SCCA kenyalaw.org:8181/exist/kenyalex…
2. Check that you are not time barred. Contract claims must be filed < 6 years after breach while civil claims must be filed < 3 years after the injury happened. But there can be exceptions in cases of disability, fraud, mistake or ignorance of material facts.