@MarcusBlimi worldview basically amounts to "my personal experience is proof but yours is worthless misunderstood 'anecdotal' garbage"

That's at least mildly inconsistent🤔🤔

We on the other hand acknowledge that anecdotes are "the leading edge of data" & accept that they can
tell a story that has evidentiary value

Evidentiary value of course =/= absolute proof

But an accumulation of anecdotes from myriad sources many of whom possess legitimate judgement to have an informed opinion to adjudicate probability of what they are seeing is compelling
Compelling to anyone with common sense that is

[This is meant to exclude any dolt who insists "only high-impact journal peer-reviewed paper" counts as evidence]

So let's look at this CDC anecdote from @MarcusBlimi

We'll even grant presumption that it's accurate😉
What does it show?
Does it make sense to extrapolate this as representative of CDC as an institution?

Answer: No.
Definitely no.

Why?

Because we know that the CDC is corrupt.

Extremely corrupt.

The depths of their corruption are mind-blowing actually.
jackanapes.substack.com/p/new-foia-rel…
Does @MarcusBlimi know what a FOIA is?

Whether she does or not, she is probably very against them being used on her precious medical agencies.

Actual accountability?? Oh the HORROR😱😱😱

And to the plebes no less🤣🤣
Tell me Blimi, what do you say about the minor problem of half of all MMWR "publications" (give or take) are fraudulent??

Like, say, the Arizona school mask 'study'

Or the Kansas nat vs vax immunity 'study'

Or the county mask mandate - hospital rate *non-comparison* 'study'
The CDC has literally completely rewritten the playbook for producing junk science.

Rewritten?

Fair point. "Expanded" is more accurate.

Should we wait for @MarcusBlimi to demand I give her a link to a bunch of MMWR's?

Or can she find them all by herself (what a skillset!!)
I think I will leave this thread hanging here as bait for now.

Let the fish think that she can find flaws in my arguments here😂😂

I think it is obvious to any sentient person that @MarcusBlimi is a hypocritical fraud who possesses little if any salient expertise on this topic.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ashmedai ashmedai.substack.com

Ashmedai ashmedai.substack.com Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ashmedaidemon

Jun 24
My my my

Is it just me, or do the officially credentialed "scientists" on twitter happen to be the most fragile and obnoxious narcissists humanity has to offer??
Imagine if they wrote their academic papers with such language

We all know how badly they want to 😂😂

But what's really impressive is their unbridled ignorance and illiteracy
@dr_colemami claims to be an immunologist?

Let's talk immunology & vaccinology then

So, Doc, can you lend your expert opinion to the following questions:
Read 5 tweets
Jun 24
Why can't you make a thread response?? SO annoying.

Regardless

@MarcusBlimi tries to pull a fast one by citing CDC *raw numbers* for emotional impact

"LOOK! 200 DEAD BABIES!! OH THE HORROR!!!"

If this is the standard for risks to children in life, then, hmmm, let's see:
cont
Bathtubs are definitely out

Like, bathtubs are totally sooooo deadly to kiddies

DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY KIDS DROWN IN BATHTUBS EACH YEAR?? HAVE YOU NO COMPASSION!!??!!

And drowning is THE leading cause of death for kids 1-4 (besides birth defects)
cdc.gov/drowning/facts… Image
But, I can already hear you saying, bathtubs are such a small risk & not giving your kiddo a bath is shall we say not an option at all, far too radical & not worth it??

BINGO!!!

And giving your child an untested vaccine whose trial data shows unmistakable NEGATIVE efficacy is??
Read 21 tweets
Jun 24
🧵about her 2nd point

@MarcusBlimi doesn't understand that she is the "lay folks" she mocks and scorns.

Let's see...

Are there any potential issues with the mRNA that are novel or 'sci-fi' like??

Answer: Resounding YES

@RMConservative @
Issue 1: m1Ψ (hey Blimi, do you know what that is?)

What can this do? How about dramatically ↑ spike production (yes that's bad), prevents mRNA decay (also bad), downregulates certain immune mechanisms (definitely very bad)
ashmedai.substack.com/p/what-they-al…
Issue #2:Codon Optimization

Who thinks that Blimi knows what that is? Not me.

And boy did they optimize recklessly

(ya this article is probably above her comprehension level but whatevs)
ashmedai.substack.com/p/gain-of-func…
Read 15 tweets
Jun 23
Here goes @MarcusBlimi again with nonsensical and dishonest claims about evidentiary standards

Dishonest? But isn't she only asking for hard data? What's dishonest about that?

Quite a bit actually.

Let's unpack this
🧵
@MarcusBlimi (BM) is essentially saying that she will only accept for proof of vaccine injuries peer-reviewed literature that analyzes a massive dataset large enough to reach statistical significance for population level extrapolation.

This is deceptive for two reasons
1. This "standard" very cagily avoids dealing with the primary evidence of vax injuries, which are not massive dataset analyses of the sort she demands (see below)

2. She is surreptitiously trying to establish a premise that this type of study is evidence for lack of vax harms
Read 46 tweets
Jun 23
He says "unanimously" as if it's a strength

It's not

It proves that the vote was a political farce

How can it be that Europe mostly refuses to recommend *any* vaccine for the kiddies but every single VRBPAC & ACIP member thinks it's a good idea??
Hey @MarcusBlimi did you bother to read the trial data on the baby trials at all?

Do you think that negative efficacy post dose 1 & 2 almost 10x higher cases than the measly 10 cases in the post dose 3 shows "efficacy"?
While we're at it, @MarcusBlimi do you want to discuss ionizable cationic liposome toxicities?

Do you even know what that is?

How about PEGylated soluble lipids?

Or N1-methyl-psuedouridine?

Or the unorthodox analogue cap sequences used for the mRNA molecules in the vaccines?
Read 13 tweets
Jun 23
This is the pompous face of evil today

Pretentious preening that any and every inconvenient data point brought up by anyone is simply "made up"

It is impossible to overstate the magnitude of death and misery her ilk have wrought

pierrekory.substack.com/p/nursing-repo…
This is the real human toll that this vile witch claims is "made up"

But these shrews do not care

Let them die
Let them suffer
It is of no consequence to these amoral sociopaths ImageImage
Healthcare workers that are not evil have to use code language to talk to each other inside of hospitals

There is a name for murderous nurses like @MarcusBlimi

Angels of Death

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_of_… Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(