This was already coming true before the Supreme Court ruling. There are many celibate men out there who are not impacted by the coming abortion bans at all. This is one of the ways male celibacy can negatively impact women’s rights—women’s rights don’t matter to alienated men.
About 1-in-3 men aged 18-to-24 years reported no sexual activity in the past year (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…), which is #NotAllMen, but a fairly significant number.
A significant amount of the 80%-or-more of women who’re sexually active are sharing partners.
It's estimated that the success rate of a vasectomy reversal is 75% if you have your vasectomy reversed within 3 years; up to 55% after 3–8 years; between 40%–45% after 9–14 years; 30% after 15–19 years; and less than 10% after 20 years (nhs.uk/conditions/con…).
Adding the Ervin Amendment (that exempted women from the draft) lead to the 1970 Senate defeat of the ERA. See, Mariclaire Hale and Leo Kanowitz, Women and the Draft: A Response to Critics of the Equal Rights Amendment, 23 Hastings L.J. 199, 200 (1971).
(repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_j…).
So-called unpaid work included “routine housework; shopping; care for household members; child care; adult care; care for non-household members; volunteering; travel related to household activities; other unpaid activities.”
@espeyraunza@magpie_2021@CaeValentine@ALeaftOnTheWind@Oneiorosgrip "[T]he father [was designated] as the natural protector of children because he had the ability to provide for their financial support. Women were seen as incapable of handling legal or financial matters…." 25 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 891, 897 (1998).
@WrthlssWnderby@TheEcho13 Evidence: male circumcision has not been banned under the same circumstances that female circumcision has already been banned (as both were historically medical procedures in the United States of America 🇺🇸); registration for selective service (and, thus, the draft) still exists.
“Female circumcision has been practiced in the United States since at least the nineteenth century… through the early-twentieth century … for the treatment of masturbation … and nymphomania” (muse.jhu.edu/article/44151).
@WrthlssWnderby@TheEcho13 “[S]ince the 1950s that discouraging masturbation was a major reason …[for] widespread circumcision of both boys and girls in the nineteenth century, a campaign which was successful in the former case, unsuccessful in the latter” (cirp.org/library/histor…).