THREAD. A quiet catastrophe is unfolding in Los Angeles. A group of judges met in secret and decided to require a cash bail schedule starting on June 30. I have been unable to find a single news story about it, so I'll explain what's happening and why it matters.
A cash bail schedule is like a menu. It means that, after you are arrested, you can't get out of jail unless you pay a cash amount that is listed on a chart. The chart requires different amounts of cash for different cases. If you're too poor, you're separated from your family.
Los Angeles already has the most crowded jail in the U.S. It's the largest jail in the country that jails the most people per capita of any society in the world. The new cash schedule will jail 10,000s more people in the next few months and create a human rights emergency.
Many people will die in the LA County jail because of this schedule. Four people died in the jail in ten days in the beginning of March alone. 1000s of people will lose their jobs/housing, and 10,000s of LA children will be separated from their parents. witnessla.com/four-la-county…
We have won lawsuits across the country finding this barbaric practice of wealth-based family separation and pretrial human caging unconstitutional. This exact schedule system was struck down elsewhere in California as violating the Fourteenth Amendment.
Here were some of the amazing results after our civil rights case @CivRightsCorps struck down the monstrous cash bail schedule in Houston, Texas:
Cash bail makes communities less safe. In addition to overcrowded jails, infectious disease, physical and sexual assaults by jail guards, and horrific medical care, the empirical evidence shows schedules make people more likely to be arrested in the future. They increase crime.
Cash bail also destroys the wealth of poor communities. In the next year, the schedule will extract between $50-100 million from poor LA families in premiums paid to for-profit bail companies.
But it's not just about profit. For the judges, it's about something else. It's about coercing guilty pleas. Everyone in the system knows there are too many cases to give everyone lawyers and a jury trial.
Judges need people to plead guilty to keep the assembly line dockets churning, and the best way to do that is to keep them in jail and to offer them release if they waive their right to a trial. This bureaucratic pressure is a primary hidden driver of systemic cruelty.
I'll have much more to come on this, but I wanted to say something about it right away since it hasn't been deemed "newsworthy" by local or national media.
On a related topic, I've just published my latest free newsletter that discusses what journalists choose to cover and what they choose to ignore, how they choose to cover those issues when they do, and how these choices are leading us toward fascism. equalityalec.substack.com/p/corporate-me…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD. Something amazing happened West Hollywood two nights ago: the city council voted to phase in 30 unarmed security ambassadors in place of 5 out of the 60 armed, violent Sheriff deputies. The media coverage was astounding. Some of it is hilarious though.
First, background: the Public Safety Commission proposed cutting 18% of contract with Sheriff to spend on science and evidence-based services for real safety. The Sheriff then began a massive PR campaign, using his 42 full-time public relations employees!
Under enormous right-wing pressure from real-estate developers and police union, city council compromised. It chose to phase out only 5 deputies over the course of a year and replace them with unarmed community ambassadors who each will cost the city's living wage of $70,000.
THREAD. There is a disturbing story in the New York Times today. As usual, NYT says things about repression in China that it rarely permits its reporters to write about the United States. A few things are especially disturbing given the abortion ruling and rising U.S. fascism.
The article is about the breathtaking bureaucracy of Chinese state police surveillance. The reporters did a lot of great journalism, and the picture they paint of the technological ability of the government to track and control dissent is bone chilling. nytimes.com/2022/06/25/tec…
First, the article is silent on this, but what it calls the "Techno Totalitarian" capabilities of China are actually similar to the U.S. government and the massive network of U.S. police bureaucracies. Building total surveillance is one of the primary goals of U.S. police.
THREAD. I prepared a few disclaimers for journalists to include in every article that quotes a cop, immediately after quoting the cop:
"Police officials have been shown to regularly make false and misleading statements to the media in order to mislead the public in service of a political agenda."
This crucial, objective journalistic context can also be easily adapted to prosecutors:
“Prosecutors have been shown to regularly make false and misleading statements to the media in order to mislead the public in service of a political agenda."
THREAD. I wrote some quotes that can be inserted directly into every news article that talks about “crime data” or “crime rates” or “crime surges” or a “crime wave" to provide the context that is lacking from most media coverage about crime and safety:
“Property crime data reported by police excludes most property crime, including wage theft ($50 billion per year, 3x more than all police-reported property crime), and tax evasion, which steals $1 trillion/year (63x times more than all police-reported property crime combined).”
“Violent crime data reported by police excludes nearly all of the violent crimes committed by police and jail guards, which experts estimate to include several million physical and sexual assaults each year.”
THREAD. One of the most common forms of copaganda in the news is when pundits pretend that people proposing science-based public safety solutions "don't care about crime" simply because the are proposing real solutions that don't rely on more investment in police and prisons.
Take a look at the latest in a long series of such articles by elites in the New York Times, the Atlantic, the Washington Post, the New Yorker, New York Magazine, etc.:
You never see actual examples in these stories because the idea that people on the left don't care about violence and safety is a fabrication. One crucial point: if a writer claims that something is widespread but can't offer a single example, then an editor shouldn't publish it.
THREAD. The Washington Post Editorial Board just published false information. What it did with the false information is even more dangerous. Because of the stakes, I try to walk through what happened line by line below.
At first glance, this editorial is another in a flood of major media articles that attempts to create an elite consensus that “criminal justice reform” has gone too far. As you read, noe that the Washington Post's motto is “Democracy Dies in the Darkness.” washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
I want to be clear. For me, the reason I’m writing about this has little to do with SF DA race. It’s one DA race in same election as much larger counties elected other progressive DAs. What matters more is the Post’s propaganda tactics because they are so pernicious and common.