Carl Bernstein, who of course helped unravel Watergate, asks a simple but brilliant question:

‘Why was Donald Trump so intent on getting to the Capitol? Why did he want to be there with all those armed people?’

Bernstein (on CNN) goes on to point out…

—>
2/ Trump knew Pence wasn’t going to interfere with formal vote counting.

So, Bernstein says, ‘Trump was going to do it himself.’

Today’s granular real-life account puts 2nd Impeachment in a different light.

Trump’s own Cabinet considered emergency effort to invoke 25th A.

—>
3/ Those voting with Trump knew what he had done.

The public is surprised by today’s testimony. But a lot of Republican officials knew all this.

Fox’s Laura Ingraham and Sean Hannity texted & called begging Meadows to get Trump to stop the uprising.
4/ Trump was so desperate to join the rioters — to lead the rioters — that he bullied his own Secret Service detail.

< Why was Trump so determined to get to the Capitol that day… >

A brilliant investigative reporter’s simple, revealing question.
5/ Not for nothing:

Today’s testimony devastating for Mark Meadows. Indifferent to violence.

The President’s Chief of Staff is often considered the 2nd most powerful person in the world.

Hutchinson urged Meadows to get Trump to act.

‘No,’ Meadows said. ‘He wants to be alone.’

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with (((Charles Fishman)))

(((Charles Fishman))) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cfishman

Jun 30
Today's decision sharply restricting EPA's ability to regulate greenhouse gases from power plants is fascinating.

First, two small but epic tidbits:

1. US power plants & energy companies achieved the GHG reductions EPA wanted *without the plan ever being put into law*!

—>
2/ Yes: The energy market in the US, the push for lower emitting sources & renewables — all that together reduced greenhouse gases by more than what the EPA was trying to achieve — and the Supreme Court never let EPA's plan go into effect.

What's that mean?

—>
3/ It means that the regulatory effort the EPA was trying to put into place couldn't have been particularly radical or disruptive — because the market leaped ahead of EPA and did it.

(It doesn't mean the plan wasn't necessary. More on that in a bit.)
Read 12 tweets
Jun 30
Today's decision from Supreme Court limiting the ability of the EPA to regulate power plant pollution is dramatic & bad in 2 ways.

1. It hobbles US ability to fight climate change.

2. The decision targets the way the US federal gov't gets its work done—agencies issuing rules.
2/ Workplace safety.

Food safety.

Hospital safety.

Vehicle & road safety.

Standards for pollution — and also for information companies must release, how stock markets function.

This is 'the administrative state.'

Congress makes laws. The 'alphabet agencies' implement them.
3/ The EPA — for instance — takes months to study problems, issue rules with all kinds of scientific detail — and then take comment and revise those rules.

With scientists & input, EPA takes years to refine Congress's instruction.

That's why we have clean air & clean water.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 30
“Just because you jump across a state line doesn’t mean your home state doesn’t have jurisdiction,” said Peter Breen, sr. counsel for the Thomas More Society. “It’s not a free abortion card when you drive across the state line.”

This is simply not true.

washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/…
2/ The anti-abortion crowd now wants to decide:

• Where you can travel as a free American in the US.

• What you can do while traveling outside anti-abortion states.

If GA has a 70 mph speed limit & FL has a 60 mph speed limit, FL CANNOT charge speeding for driving 70 in GA.
3/ DC has strict gun laws. Virginia does not. DC can’t charge residents with gun law violations for using guns in Virginia — in ways that would be illegal in DC.

Republicans seem to be leaving behind their passion for individual liberty.

Missouri.
Arkansas.
South Dakota.
—>
Read 4 tweets
Jun 28
Jan. 6 insurrection hearing...

Cassidy Hutchinson testifying.

Before his Ellipse speech, Trump was angry that the crowd area wasn't full.

His supporters declined to go through the metal detectors ('mags') — because they saw weapons being seized and they were carrying weapons.
2/ Hutchinson says that Trump complained several times about the magnetometers — the metal detectors. He wanted his supporters let in.

'They’re not here to hurt me,' Trump said.

Trump wanted his supports to *keep* their weapons, hear his speech, then march to the Capitol.
3/ Hutchinson is calm, even a little tentative. But detailed, specific. Damning.

She worked for Trump. She worked for Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows.

Hutchinson just now says White House counsel Cipollone warned her not to let Trump or staff march to the Capitol.

—>
Read 13 tweets
May 27
I'm live-streaming Wellesley College commencement this morning, because we have a family friend graduating.

The speaker: Nergis Mavalvala.

Nergis is Dean of Science at MIT.
BS from Wellesley.
PhD from MIT.

All that is amazing enough:

Not many people end up as a dean at MIT.
2/ But here's the thing:

Nergis Mavalvala — an astrophysicist professor of physics, a brilliant pioneering researcher & wonderfully accessible mentor — Nergis comes from a family where neither Mom or Dad went to college.

From no college to PhD dean at MIT in one leap.
3/ In her talk this morning, Nergis told the assembled Wellesley class of 2022 that she grew up in Karachi, Pakistan.

Two of her key teachers as a young girl:

The owner of a bike repair shop, who taught her to fix her own bike (she couldn't afford to pay for repairs).

—>
Read 9 tweets
May 26
Police at Uvalde school shooting literally attacked frantic parents, while waiting outside the school & not storming in to take out the gunman.

• 1 parent handcuffed
• 1 parent tackled
• 1 parent pepper-sprayed

Stunning reporting in WSJ story (free)

wsj.com/articles/uvald…
2/ These are first-hand accounts from parents who were outside the school in Uvalde.

Just mind-boggling. Frantic parents urging police — for 20, 30 min — to go in & take out the shooter. Heavily armed police decided instead to restrain the parents.

wsj.com/articles/uvald…
3/ Police apparently waiting for a tactical team. For 30 to 50 minutes.

One 18-year-old boy, who had owned guns for 2 weeks, holding off trained, armed, city police officers — at an elementary school.

WSJ reports several parents dodged police line & entered school themselves.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(