I am sure this open letter will never reach you for the simple reason that you don’t exist.
And yet I write so maybe my fellow Hindus can understand the myth of the 'moderate Muslim' and never be fooled by apologists.
2. Moderate Muslim is the figment of the secular Hindu’s imagination. This secular Hindu is a useful idiot and who is unable to understand the nature of radical Islam. I am told that moderate Muslims are the real guardians of Islam. The thing is: I can’t find them.
3. I have looked for years. And I am not alone. The search for the moderate Muslim is the search for El Dorado. Everyone talks about it. Everyone swears by it. Everyone thinks all problems in the world will be solved when he is found. But no one has ever found a moderate Muslim.
4. The moderate Muslim remains a mirage; a daydream; the wishful thinking of the non-Muslim who refuses to accept that fundamentalism lies at the very heart of Islam. Moderation requires a commitment to change, and not sticking to fundamentals.
5. Moderation can’t be claimed by just semantics. It requires that the extremists are opposed more urgently than the ‘others’. Moderation demands that the views of the ‘others’ are tolerated & accepted. Moderation asks that racist, genocidal & xenophobic views are condemned.
6. Moderation requires tolerance & permanent changes in fundamentalist ideology. Moderation demands an acceptance of the ‘other’. But, you my imaginary ‘moderate Muslim’ have done no such thing. And I will show you how. Let us start with the fundamentals.
7. The Shahada declares: “There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is his Messenger.” A Muslim declares that the non-Muslim God or gods are demons, devils and figments of his imagination. The extremist, as well as the moderate Muslim holds this intolerance exclusivist view.
8 My dear moderate Muslim, moderation would require that you reject the Shahadah; or that you would change it to accommodate other gods. That “there can more than one path to truth” has to be accepted. But the moderate Muslim also believes that all other paths lead to Hell.
9. Moderation requires basic human rights extended to all, regardless of religion, creed and ethnicity. But non-Muslims are denied all basic human rights. Ethics in Islam is only for Muslims. This is what the extremist Muslim believes. Moderate Muslim also believes the same.
10. Moderation would require that you do not consider women as inferior to men; fight for their right to reject burqa; let them go to mosque; and not consider them properties of men. The fact that you do not do any such thing shows that you are not moderate.
11. Moderation would require equality before law. The Islamic law dictates that testimony of the non-Muslim does not hold; & that the testimony of a woman is only half as worthy as that of a man. This is the stuff of extremism. But no moderates have spoken against it.
12. Moderation would require that you accept secular law superior to religious law. But you only accept and demand the Islamic law called Shariat. This is not the stuff of moderation. This is stuff of extreme radicalization.
13. Moderation would require that art is given a free hand; that the artist, within limits is permitted to create human as well as animal figures as he wishes to. The fact that you also consider this wrong shows that you are no different from the extremist Muslim.
14. Moderation would require that you would accept the testimony of science as a way of knowing. The fact that you still stick to the dogmas propagated in the Quran instead of accepting the testimony of science shows that you are no different from the extremist Muslim.
15. Moderation would require acceptance that direct contact with divinity is possible and that there can be more than one messenger for God. But you think this is impossibility just like an extremist Muslim shows that you are a figment of the imagination of a useful idiot.
16. Your Holy Book contains some violent verses about non-Muslims in which Muslims are exhorted to kill non-Muslims wherever they are found. Moderation would require that you reject at least these verses. The fact that you don’t do that once again shows your non-existence.
17. Moderation would require that Muslims are allowed to leave Islam; that they are allowed to follow other gods if they wish so. The fact that you consider this a crime punishable by death shows that there is no difference between you and the extremist Muslim.
18. For you may not be the terrorist, my dear moderate Muslim, but you didn’t want the kaffir to live either. You weren’t the terrorist, but you think that Kaffirs have to convert to Islam. You may not be the terrorist, but you think that being a non-Muslim is a sin in itself.
19. You were not the terrorist who gang-raped pagan Yazidi women in Iraq, but you always maintained that the worth of a non-Muslim life is always less than a Muslim life. You don’t shoot women to death for teaching their kids, but you also think that burqa is the home for them.
20. You weren’t the one who engaged in the Noakhali massacre of Hindus, or the Moplah riots, but you also accepted the two-nation theory, you also accepted that it is impossible for Muslims to live under the rule of Hindus, in a secular country.
21. You are not the one who kills Hindus in Pakistan and Bangladesh but you are the one who accepts that the only way Hindus can survive in an Islamic country is to live like second class citizens who do not even get to cremate their dead.
22. You were not the terrorist who killed the apostates of Islam in Bangladesh, Pakistan and many other countries, but you also think that it is legal to kill apostates. You do not throw gays from the rooftops in Iraq but you also think that sodomy should be punishable by death.
23. You were not the terrorist who gang-raped & sawed in half the body of Girija Tickoo, while she was still alive, in Kashmir, but you supported ethnic cleansing of Hindus that was going on. You also believed that Kashmir is only for Muslims and that Hindu lives do not matter.
24. You were not the terrorist who beheaded a poor Hindu tailor who did not even commit any blasphemy. Someone had commented from his ID to support Nupur. But you also maintain that ‘Gustakhe Rasool ki ek hi saza, Sar tan se juda, sar tan se juda.’
25. While the extremist Muslim gets into the field and accomplishes all the goals discussed above, you, my moderate Muslim, help and facilitate him in civil society, by creating a movement conducive to his goals.
26. You help him by silencing the dissent among the Hindus, those Hindus who really see radical Islam for what he is. You are the smokescreen that the Islamic terrorist uses to kill non-Muslims in their sleep wherever they are found.
27. You are the diversion that the Islamic terrorist uses. You are the Shaheen Bagh that makes possible a 26/11. You are the Zubair who incites a Gos Muhammad. You are the Rana Ayyub that makes it possible for common Muslims to kill Kamlesh Tiwari.
28. So no, you weren’t the Islamic terrorist. But you were the culture that built him. You were the bullet in his AK-47. You were the bomb that he threw. You were the dagger that he wielded to cut the head of Kanhaiya Lal.
===
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Indian Judiciary, Islamic Law and Hindu Society – A History of Victim-Shaming
#NupurSharma quoted from Islamic scriptures. Indian courts blamed her instead of scriptures or those who issued her death threats. This was essentially victim-shaming & it has a history. Read on.
2. Nupur was quoting verbatim from the Islamic scriptures; that too in response of constantly horrible insults of Hindu gods by Mullahs. Islamic world erupted after dog-whistling by Zuber and Rana. She started receiving death threats/ rape threats.
3. Muslims started rioting all over India, threatening Hindu society and Indian state. Then several Islamic terrorists beheaded various innocent Hindus all across India, including Udaipur where they made boastful videos singing ‘Sar Tan se Juda…’
41 Years ago in 1981, Sita Ram Goel warned Hindu society that it was under siege from a united front of Five Forces: Islamism, Christianity, Communism, Macaulyism & Modernism. It’s high time we listen to him.
2. We are fond of saying that Sanātana dharma will never lose. But it is not true at the level of society, as SRG says. He says that while our texts and scriptures might live in the West, but the vehicle of Sanātana dharma, the Hindu society is under mortal danger and can die.
3. SRG says: “…the death of Hindu society is no longer an eventuality which cannot be envisaged. This great society is now besieged by the same dark and deadly forces which have overwhelmed and obliterated many ancient societies.” We know these 5 forces above.
1. It is an ASYMMETRIC WAR. We hope to fight with the State – Military, Police and Courts. But they fight EVERYWHERE and with EVERYTHING. We fight one faceted war. While they are fighting TOTAL WAR. That is what we need to understand.
2. What will the army do when it is your maid and your doodhwala who wants you dead for just supporting a woman? What will the police do when it is your everyday customer who wants to behead you? What will the courts do when ‘sar tan se juda’ has already happened?
3. It is an ASYMMETRIC WAR, because the enemy doesn’t fear consequences, legal or otherwise. There is a saying, ‘You can kill anyone in the world, you must just be prepared to die yourself.’ That is what their psyche is. You can’t fight it with the legal machinery only.
1. It was not unexpected. It was not random. If we did not see it coming we were living in fool's paradise. The ghastly beheadings and killings of common Hindus by radicalized common Muslims is THE plan. The message is: Submit to the dictates of Islamists or else!
2. Kanhaiya lal hadn’t posted anything insulting against Islam or the Prophet. He had just supported Nupur Sharma, and he was beheaded for that. This is the extent of Islamist terror that we need to realize. We are under threat because we are not Muslims. #Kanhaiya
3. The plan is to terrorize us into submission. The plan is to threaten the common Hindu that Islam can't be criticized, can't be touched. That Hindus are second-class citizens - dhimmis - and should quietly tolerate the insult of their gods until Hinduism is no more.
There are five pillars of Islam which are considered indispensible for following One True Religion. These are: Shahada (Profession of Faith), Salat (Prayer), Zakat (Alms), Sawm (Fasting), and Hajj (Pilgrimmage).
2. Shahada - the very profession of Islamic faith makes any co-existence with any other religion impossible. "I bear witness that there is no deity but Allah, and I bear witness that Muhammad is the messenger of God." No other form of God is allowed, nor any other prophet.
3. Any possibility of coming together with any other religious community, any rapprochement becomes impossible because it is being declared that all other forms of gods are false gods, and any deity or guru attempting to help anyone is an imposter.
Does general public morality have a place in Islam? As it turns out, it does. Islam is not devoid of morality, and its scriptures are full of moral injunctions, with one significant difference.
2. Morality in Islam is faith based. It is sectarian. There are no universal moral principles in Islam which are applied on everyone. There is always the distinction between the Momin and the Kaffir – the Muslim and the non-Muslim – the believer and the non-believer.
3. “A Muslim owes everything to the ummah, very little to others. He has no obligations, moral or spiritual, toward non-Muslims as part of the human race, except to convert them by sword, spoils and jizyah.” Ram Swarup in ‘Understanding Islam through Hadis’.