SCOTUS has opened Pandora's box. They've reverted to an extreme "states' rights" position that allows red states to end civil rights and oversight of corporations. Blue states like CA are going to try to drive the market with sanctuary laws and their own regs. 1/n
We're heading precisely towards the next phase of the American implosion: Two Americas, like in post-reconstruction and Jim Crow. What will (likely) determine if we move on to the next phase of dystopia is (again) the courts. 2/n
If SCOTUS allows Texas to prosecute women who leave the state for abortions, and to prosecute doctors who perform abortions outside the state (or provide medications like Plan B), that ignites the next crisis: 3/n
Will blue states continue to recognize SCOTUS as a legitimate authority? Or, will it act as another Dred Scott decision? At that point, blue states have a choice: 4/n
The safe and easy path of accepting authoritarianism, theocracy, and single party rule, or the messy, risky, and chaotic path of soft (e.g. Kurds in Iraq) or hard secession (e.g. CSA)? Does this result in a USSR or Yugoslavia scenario? 5/n
Regardless, Hell is empty and all the devils are here. I can't imagine the "Two States" equilibrium lasting past a SCOTUS that gets even one more hardliner to go with Barrett, Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh. Which is likely to arrive between 2025 and 2028. 6/n
Red states are bent on forcing the issue, and I suspect that SCOTUS will let a SB8 law targeting women who go out of state for abortions to slide through, claiming that it lies outside their powers to rule on (just as they did SB8) 7/n
So yeah, we're on a rail towards the court forcing blue states into a corner, and then getting the judicial equivalent of "*** around and find out."
As Scott attests, there are consequences to awful SCOTUS rulings, including the ending of most life on the planet. 8/n
We're one SCOTUS vote away from gerrymandered state legislatures having the right to overturn any election they don't like the result of. That represents the end of American democracy, and another impetus for blue states to take they ball and go home. 9/n
Once we reach a point where it no longer matters how people vote, Republicans will always win the presidency (and that could be as soon as 2024), that's all folks. We implode, because there is ZERO incentive left for blue states to continue the charade. 10/n
When it is obvious to everyone in the public that the game is so rigged that blue states no longer have any meaningful say in federal governance, and that no amount of voting can alter this equation, it gets ugly FAST. 11/n
What incentive is there to participate in a system that seeks to punish you, but you cannot influence in any meaningful way, ever? Because you know the GOP is going to seek to punish California for it's "San Francisco values". And "liberal Hollywood". 12/n
The GOP wants a religious and cultural war, and is intent on ending any semblance of Democracy to get it. SCOTUS is giving them all the tools they need to wage it successfully.
In a deeply polarized nation (by geography and demographics), this is a recipe for civil war. 13/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
With the end of Roe v. Wade, and access to abortion disappearing in half the US, let's talk about the law of unintended consequences: namely, the awful downstream effects of this ruling. 1/n
First, there's maternal mortality. Poland has gone down this road, and the result is doctors who will let a woman die rather than going to jail for performing an abortion. With US states making it punishable by life in prison, many women will die. 2/n nytimes.com/2022/06/12/wor…
Then there's infant mortality. Most later-term abortions are due to discovering fetal abnormalities inconsistent with life. Women will be forced to carry fetuses to term that won't make it to their 1st or 5th birthday, regardless of medical intervention. 3/n
* It seems that at least one of Kavanaugh or Gorsuch really does believe that Obergefell is different because it doesn't involve "life". Votes to overturn it may not be there.
* Same with Griswold, Eisenstadt, & Lawrence. 1/n
* There has been internal debate w/in GOP whether or not to go after Lawrence before the mid-terms.
* GOP concerned that it would hurt them at polls
* ADF pushing to go immediately b/c they did a lot of legwork beforehand. And they're religious zealots. 2/n
* GOP coming around to the opinion that with all the anti-LGBT stuff firing up the base that going after Obergefell will keep the base fired up, while LGBT community is small, and most straights don't vote based on LGBT issues. Thus, targeting Obergefell is a net win. 3/n
I long ago abandoned any belief that marches have any effect on modern fascists and theocrats. See: Poland, Belarus. I mean sure, if it makes you feel better to engage in some primal scream therapy, great. But it won't actually have any effect on a congress where 92% are safe.
It won't have any effect on SCOTUS justices who have jobs for life and top-end 24/7 security for the rest of their lives. It won't change the theocrats minds: they just love watching you impotently yell and wave signs about.
Everyone in this process is insulated from any consequences. You can't unelect 92% of them because they're in deep red states or their districts have been gerrymandered to hell. Maybe you'll convince some Democrats to get a little more creative, but did you see the response today
The culture war works because it energizes his base, and doesn't turn off moderates and independents enough to swing their vote. We're already entered the competitive outbidding phase, where Republicans jockey to see who can be the most radically anti-LGBTQ.
This is so freaking dangerous, because they will always invent new reasons to be outraged by LGBT people, no matter how far they go.
Until, finally, they declare there must be no LGBTQ people, by any means necessary.
To protect women, children, and "Western Civ", of course.