With all the chatter about the latest statist overeach in the EU regarding bitcoin and 'unhosted wallets' I figured I would share some slides from my talk at @GunsnBitcoin 2022 in Miami
Let's start with Satoshi's white paper titled "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
The clue is in the title.
Take note of the following key words:
- Peer-to-Peer
- Electronic Cash.
We'll come back to that, but first to understand what Satoshi invented we need to understand physical (non digital) cash
Aristotle explored what makes good money in his Nicomachean Ethics. No doubt many of you have seen this before, usually when someone is trying to convince you to buy gold. But it just so happens that even physical fiat dollars tick these boxes too.
We're increasingly in a world where we are taught to be suspicious of cash, that those who choose to deal primarily with physical cash are shady at best or criminals at worst.
This gas lighting is a recent innovation. The old expression 'Cash is king' exists for a reason.
This ties into what is referred to as "The War on Cash"
Make no mistake, this is a war, and the victory condition is a state where *all* transactions are tied to an identity that leaves an audit trail for law enforcement and tax authorities.
Like all wars, propaganda plays a huge part. Thanks to industry involvement and collaboration, physical cash is seen as dirty, illicit, and strange
Another effective tool in this war is the absolute legislative and policy control our adversary commands.
In the US private money was banned in the 1930s, with the power to control supply and denominations of notes under total state control.
Control the money control the people
Adding to the legislative weapons of this war is the legal ceiling on cash payments. In Greece it is illegal to transact more than €500 in cash
Make no mistake, the war on cash is a real thing. The benefits of a cash free society are too great (from the perspective of central bankers and the state)
And make no mistake, the war on cash is a WAR ON YOU
With that let's jump back to Satoshi's white paper...
In the second post of this thread I highlighted two key words in the white paper title.
- Peer-to-Peer
- Electronic Cash
But actually I think it is misleading...
In fact, the emphasis shouldn't be 'Electronic Cash' but actually 'Cash System'
Bitcoin isn't money. Bitcoin isn't cash.
Bitcoin is an entire system, a system for creating the conditions of physical cash, electronically.
Fundamentally Bitcoin (Satoshi's Cash System) is software.
Unfortunately from the very early days Bitcoin has been painted as "a better money" but this is flawed and why Bitcoin is being actively attacked in the war on cash, tied up in 'Anti Money Laundering' regulations
Satoshi's Cash System was successful. The system created the conditions for an electronic analog to physical cash. For the first time ever, data could be cash.
And even more brilliantly, data is analogous to speech, and speech always wants to be free.
Let us return back to the flawed concept of equating Bitcoin to money.
By framing Bitcoin in this way is to let the enemy choose the battlefield. If Bitcoin is money you eventually accept it must be regulated and controlled as all money is (yes even gold)
There are no 'coins', no 'notes', no 'currency units'.
There is only a chain of digital signatures.
Text. Data. Speech.
There is no issuance of currency. When a new block is found a new special digital signature is created. The signature announced publicly to anyone who will listen
Text. Data. Speech.
And yes, we are guilty of this metaphor, but there are no wallets.
There are only keychains that hold public/private key pair data
Text. Data. Speech.
To wrap things up let's look at Satoshi's Cash System in the context of the War on Cash
- Bitcoin represents a *serious* threat to the war on cash
- Without firm control the central banker vision of a cashless society can be severely undermined with Bitcoin
With that in mind regulatory capture is the best bet for neutering and controlling the fall out of a cash system they cannot outright shut down or effectively ban.
KYC is among the most effective tools they have to not only wrangle the cash system but to completely capture it.
More users of the cash system that are identified plays right into their strategic vision of a cashless society where all transactions are tied to an entity.
For those of you who made it this far, thanks for reading
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In Oct we asked our attorney @Deliver8tor to assemble an expert legal team to respond to FinCEN's proposed rules that would effectively ban bitcoin privacy best practices such as not reusing addresses, and coinjoin.
FinCEN should withdraw entirely the Mixing Transaction NPRM because if adopted, would be the first time FinCEN used its Section 311 powers against a class of transactions, but also the first time FinCEN has ever imposed Special Measure 1.
The Mixing Transaction NPRM proposes a rule that is an improper and overbroad application of Section 311 measures to achieve transaction surveillance and suppression that FinCEN does not otherwise have a lawful basis to undertake.
We can confirm that @ocean_mining has enacted a policy of censoring Whirlpool coinjoin transactions and BIP47 notification transactions as of Dec 6, 2023
This is a regrettable action by the operators @jack and @LukeDashjr and far surpasses any hostile action we have seen before
Luke is claiming that Whirlpool transactions are "bugged" and create non standard transactions due to a 46 byte OP_RETURN present in Whirlpool Tx0 transactions.
This is a lie. He knows it is a lie. The OP_RETURN limit has been 80 bytes since Bitcoin Core version 0.12
Luke runs a fork of Core called Knots, in his fork he has defined the OP_RETURN limit at 42 bytes. He is more than entitled to do this.
However to claim Whirlpool transactions are non standard because they do not conform to the values of his niche fork is totally wrong and a lie
We're seeing a large number of coins leaving Wasabi into Whirlpool over the last few days. The market is speaking and loudly repelling censorship and surveillance.
If you're new, especially coming from Wasabi this thread will explain the key differences in Whirlpool
In Whirlpool the coordinator fee is a flat fee and is paid upfront. The flat fee makes it cheaper to coinjoin for users (instead of % of amt you mix) and makes it more costly for an attacker to disrupt the registration phase. We call this setup transaction the "Tx0"
In Whirlpool no address reuse or coins that have been 'seen' together in previous transactions are allowed into the mix transaction. Unlike Wasabi where up to seven outputs are controlled by one user, Whirlpool mixes only allow one output per user per mix transaction.
CoinJoin coordinators are simply message passers. This is true of Wasabi & Whirlpool. They are not money transmitters, they are not facilitators they simply pass data packets to connected clients. Clients never surrender custody to any 3rd party. Clients collaborate w/ each other
Your ISP is not responsible for the websites you visit, even though they serve you the data packets that made your visit possible.
Your VPN is not responsible for copyright infringement when you illegally download a torrent.
The ability to share data freely be it books, art, media, thoughts and ideas, or UTXO state is essential for free society and is fundamentally human.
The radical encroachment of the state into the lives of ordinary law abiding citizens is on an a concerning upward trajectory.
We're proud to release the Bitcoin Privacy Series on youtube today. The first 7 videos are all under 7 minutes long and will get you up to speed on the challenging concept that is bitcoin privacy.
Check out the playlist & like and sub for more videos
The first video introduces the concept of Unspent Transaction Outputs (UTXOs). This is a fundamental step in understanding bitcoin transaction privacy. In 2 minutes you will gain an understanding of UTXOs
The second video explains the change output. For a lot of bitcoin users the concept of a change output is either completely unknown or misunderstood. In 2 minutes you will understand change outputs and how bitcoin transactions are structured
It is absolutely essential that any truckers who received bitcoin yesterday from @HonkHonkHodl do not attempt to cash out using a centralized exchange.
These funds are subject to a Mareva injunction and violation of that order is a criminal act
Unfortunately because of the way the organizers decided to distribute these funds with static known addresses and obvious structuring links on the bitcoin blockchain all the source addresses and many of the distribution addresses are specified in this injunction
There have already been several movements of the distributed funds to centralized entities like crypto[.]com and Coinbase.
This is bad news since both those entities have your ID and both have a duty to comply with legal requirements in countries they do business in.