What is happening in Uzbekistan is very serious. Amendments proposed into the Chapter XVII of the Uzbekistan Constitution are viewed as highly provocative by the Karakalpaks. If they are really passed, this may exacerbate the situation even further, escalating the conflict
International community should dissuade President Mirziyoyev from amending the Chapter XVII of the Constitution before it's too late. Deescalating the conflict now is absolutely possible and relatively easy. In a week or two it may be too late, if a lot of blood is shed by then
Uzbekistan is lingustically heterogenous. Uzbeks are Karluks (like Uyghurs). Karakalpaks are Kipchaks (like Kazakhs). Khwarezmians are Oghuz (like Turks in Turkey). Almost all rural population is Turkic, but cities like Bukhara or Samarkand still have many Persian speakers
In the course of the Turkic migration, countryside was Turkified first. Meanwhile some of the cities continued to speak Persian for many centuries, remaining the Iranian islands among the Turkic sea. Not unlike some of the old urban centers of Anatolia after the Seljuk invasion
Karakalpaks live in the northwest and thus are very much affected by the disappearance of the Aral Sea. They used to be coast dwellers and their mode of life heavily dependent upon the sea that is ceasing to exist. Water that used to feed it was directed to the cotton fields
Cotton production was introduced to the region by the Russian Empire to create a source of raw materials for the Russian textile industry. Later Soviets would greatly expand the cotton production to produce gunpowder. But the cotton consumes too much water to grow
Soviet cotton production consumed too much water, depleting the rivers. And it killed the Aral Sea. What used to be the sea bottom is now desert. Wind is blowing the salt and the chemicals brought to the former sea from the fields by the rivers all around the neighbouring areas
Even worse, Soviets used the former Vozrozhdeniye Island as a polygon for biological weaponry for decades. Now it is a peninsula, because the water from the Uzbek side is draining quickly. Kazakstan which is much richer took some efforts to save its own part of the sea
The Aral shore is a location of the enormous man made catastrophe. Basically the Aral desert is a byproduct of the Soviet cotton production. Cotton (=gunpowder) production was prioritised while keeping the environment and the economy of locals was not
In 1990, even before the collapse of the USSR, Karakalpakstan declared its sovereignty. In 1993 it signed a treaty with Uzbekistan. It agreed to remain as part of the country for 20 years, if it keeps its sovereignty and will have a right to later secede through a referendum
Basically in 1993 Uzbekistan signed a treaty agreeing to allow Karakalpaks the independence referendum in 2013. Of course, later the central government would concentrate all the powers and never allow it. In 2013 it simply arrested those idiots who really advocated for it
Now it introduced new amendments to the Constitution (see here, Chapter XVII, you can google translate it) gazeta.uz/ru/2022/06/30/… which strip the region from the remaining rights. That provoked the mass unrests
Uzbekistan ministry of interior claims they already suppressed them. They did not. But if the unrests continue, the government wil escalate the violence which may lead to the unpredictable consequences in a very young and poor society with rapidly rising cost of life
International community should persuade President Mirziyoyev to abstain from amending the Chapter XVII of the Constitution. Deescalation is still possible, before a lot of blood is shed. The end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yes, and that is super duper quadruper important to understand
Koreans are poor (don't have an empire) and, therefore, must do productive work to earn their living. So, if the Americans want to learn how to do anything productive they must learn it from Koreans etc
There is this stupid idea that the ultra high level of life and consumption in the United States has something to do with their productivity. That is of course a complete sham. An average American doesn't do anything useful or important to justify (or earn!) his kingly lifestyle
The kingly lifestyle of an average American is not based on his "productivity" (what a BS, lol) but on the global empire Americans are holding currently. Part of the imperial dynamics being, all the actually useful work, all the material production is getting outsourced abroad
Reading Tess of the d'Urbervilles. Set in southwest England, somewhere in the late 1800s. And the first thing you need to know is that Tess is bilingual. He speaks a local dialect she learnt at home, and the standard English she picked at school from a London-trained teacher
So, basically, "normal" language doesn't come out of nowhere. Under the normal conditions, people on the ground speak all the incomprehensible patois, wildly different from each other
"Regular", "correct" English is the creation of state
So, basically, the state chooses a standard (usually, based on one of the dialects), cleanses it a bit, and then shoves down everyone's throats via the standardized education
Purely artificial construct, of a super mega state that really appeared only by the late 1800s
There's a subtle point here that 99,999% of Western commentariat is missing. Like, totally blind to. And that point is:
Building a huuuuuuuuuuge dam (or steel plant, or whatever) has been EVERYONE's plan of development. Like absolutely every developing country, no exceptions
Almost everyone who tried to develop did it in a USSR-ish way, via prestige projects. Build a dam. A steel plant. A huge plant. And then an even bigger one
And then you run out of money, and it all goes bust and all you have is postapocalyptic ruins for the kids to play in
If China did not go bust, in a way like almost every development project from the USSR to South Asia did, that probably means that you guys are wrong about China. Like totally wrong
What you describe is not China but the USSR, and its copies & emulations elsewhere
What I am saying is that "capitalist reforms" are a buzzword devoid of any actual meaning, and a buzzword that obfuscated rather than explains. Specifically, it is fusing radically different policies taken under the radically different circumstances (and timing!) into one - purely for ideological purposes
It can be argued, for example, that starting from the 1980s, China has undertaken massive socialist reforms, specifically in infrastructure, and in basic (mother) industries, such as steel, petrochemical and chemical and, of course, power
The primary weakness of this argument is that being true, historically speaking, it is just false in the context of American politics where the “communism” label has been so over-used (and misapplied) that it lost all of its former power:
“We want X”
“No, that is communism”
“We want communism”
Basically, when you use a label like “communism” as a deus ex machina winning you every argument, you simultaneously re-define its meaning. And when you use it to beat off every popular socio economic demand (e.g. universal healthcare), you re-define communism as a synthesis of all the popular socio economic demands
Historical communism = forced industrial development in a poor, predominantly agrarian country, funded through expropriation of the peasantry
(With the most disastrous economic and humanitarian consequences)
Many are trying to explain his success with some accidental factors such as his “personal charisma”, Cuomo's weakness etc
Still, I think there may be some fundamental factors here. A longue durée shift, and a very profound one
1. Public outrage does not work anymore
If you look at Zohran, he is calm, constructive, and rarely raises his voice. I think one thing that Mamdani - but almost no one else in the American political space is getting - is that the public is getting tired of the outrage
Outrage, anger, righteous indignation have all been the primary drivers of American politics for quite a while
For a while, this tactics worked
Indeed, when everyone around is polite, and soft (and insincere), freaking out was a smart thing to do. It could help you get noticed