The Shanghai police data heist grows more insane: Experts say the database of nearly 1b Chinese citizens was not hacked—it simply had no password, allowing the thief to waltz in, wipe the data & leave a ransom note: "contact_for_your_data…recovery10btc." wsj.com/articles/china…
I spoke to two cybersecurity experts @vinnytroia & @MayhemDayOne who both run cybersecurity services that regularly scan the web for unsecured databases. They each discovered this database at different points earlier this year but didn't immediately realize what it was.
After the recent news about the leak, they went back through their notes and found an exact match to the description of the database that a user on a cybercrime forum is now selling—for the same price tag as the ransom amount: 10BTC.
Their notes show that while the database itself was protected on a private server, a dashboard for managing and accessing the data was set up on a public web address and left open without a password.
It effectively created an open door to the data vault, allowing anyone who stumbled upon it to export and edit the data unencumbered.
That door stayed open for over a year, from April 2021 all the way until mid June 2022, when a thief used it to wipe all the data for a ransom.
That door stayed open for over a year, from April 2021 all the way until mid June 2022, when a thief used it to wipe all the data for a ransom.
And even then—after the data went *missing*—the door continued to stay open for another ~2 weeks, until the vulnerability started getting widespread attention.
Troia says it's likely the same entity that took the data and is now peddling it. “What’s pretty common is if the ransom victim doesn’t pay the ransom, then they’ll try to sell the data off online,” he says.
These kinds of vulnerabilities are extremely common—but both Troia & Diachenko say this one is particularly unique for the sheer amount of data left unsecured. Troia called it "insane." Diachenko said he's never encountered anything larger than this one.
These new details put to rest another rumor that was gaining traction that the vulnerability could have been caused by a 2020 technical blog post that appeared to have inadvertently published the credentials to a Shanghai police server.
https://twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1543905416748359680
Troia & Diachenko point out that there were no credentials necessary to access this data, making the speculation unlikely.
If you missed it, you can read our first story here. wsj.com/articles/vast-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
