.@StrandRoger remarks 3 key discussions:
1⃣ Science Doesn’t Speak Truth to Power. As US President Eisenhower warned, science advice has a risk of making public policy captive of a scientific-technological elite.
Transparency, reflexivity, and contextuality may prevent this risk.
2⃣ Control is a False Ideal. Any evaluation framework may be useful, but not to fulfill a Cartesian dream of commanding and controlling policymaking and systems. Relying on pluralism and network approaches to governance may be more relevant for #Science4Policy ecosystems.
3⃣ We should be smarter than SMART. Moving on from the SMART business jargon in public administration, which encourages ex-ante decisions, to a more imaginative, co-production and co-creative space that network governance does require.
Then, @strandroger proposes a five Evidence-star system, building on @SFuntowicz suggestion to distinguish quality/grade. Increasing your⭐️by fostering integrity & truthfulness, relevance, pluralism, reflexivity & coproduction. Read it fully in the report: tinyurl.com/StrandReport
This is part of a @EU_ScienceHub project on developing an evaluation framework for #Science4Policy systems. We asked three experts to share their ideas: while @StrandRoger took this normative view, @oliver_kathryn used a science system angle & @IngeNiestroy the public admin side.
The @MSCActions Postdoctoral Fellowship call 2022 offers researchers the option of being placed up to 6-month at a non-academic organisation. Have you considered spending that time at a public administration? Deadline for applications: 14th September 2022. ec.europa.eu/info/funding-t…
We had researchers of all scientific disciplines meeting with representatives from national public administrations, international organisations and NGOs. But you may also consult this #MSCA matchmaking platform by @MSCANetwork@EEN_EU@madrimasd for hosts. msca.b2match.io/home