The war in Ukraine and the regional divergence in Russia
1. It will be a long war
2. Hostilities can be localised or interrupted with ceasefires. Doesn't matter. The fighting will resume again. And again
3. Contrary to the popular opinion, it will be Russia that breaks first🧵
4. Russian regime is hard and fragile
5. Regime consists of courtiers and barons: central and regional elites
6. Courtiers have the upper hand when the regime is strong, barons - when it's weak
7. Many courtiers have personal interest in the military victory, but barons don't
8. You can't judge official's view by his public stance. That's dumb. Only private stance matters
9. Lots of courtiers over 35 genuinely support the war
10. Almost no regional barons genuinely support the war. But there's a major exception in the South
11. The war led not only to the general economic downturn, but also to the massive regional divergence in Russia
12. Most of the regions lose, but they lose unevenly
13. In the past the center was an arbiter, redistributing resources from winners to losers. Now it won't
Biggest Losers in European Russia:
13. Large industrial & machinery cluster on Volga. Tatarstan, Samara, Ulyanovsk
14. The window to Europe in the Northwest. St Petersburg, Karelia, Pskov
15. The North. Arkhangelsk and the ancient Pomorye country. The old window to Europe
One of the biggest economic losers in Russia is the major machinery cluster on Volga. Tatarstan, Samara, Ulyanovsk are three regions with very similar economic model. They focused on improving the investment climate and attracting the FDIs. Obviously, they are being obliterated
Another loser is the North, which broadly overlaps with the borders of Pomorye land. Until 1703 it was the richest, the most commercially oriented part of Russia and of course the main taxpaying region. Even now Arkhangelsk was one of the most FDI-dependent regions in the country
Finally, it is the modern window to Europe, the Northwest that is especially affected employment-wise. St Petersburg economy was heavily oriented to Europe and those of nearby regions - on Europe and the megapolis of St Petersburg
Winners
14. Agrarian producers. With the food prices increased agrarian barons of Krasnodar or Rostov may have even benefitted. Plus they're involved in plundering Ukraine
15. Cannon fodder suppliers. Dagestan or Astrakhan are doing well, because the extra males went to Ukraine
We see a massive regional divergence in European Russia. Baronial groups that focused on the machinery or the FDI attraction lose massively. However, the barons of the poorest regions may even benefit by selling their surplus population as the cannon fodder to Putin
Interestingly enough, we see the negative correlation between the good unemployment situation of a region and its level of economic complexity. Check this map. The most complex regions are doing the worst, while the least complex - the best researchgate.net/figure/c-RIA-i…
And yet, cannon fodder suppliers don't export anything. The only regional interest group that was interested in prolonging the war were the agrarian barons of the South. First, they obliterated their Ukrainian competitors. Second, they were involved in plundering Ukraine
Third, they benefited from the food prices going into the stratosphere till this month. They had every reason to support the policy of Kremlin. And yet, now food prices are crashing. Which means their export profits will decrease and even worse, expropriated by Kremlin
With prices on almost all commodities dropping Kremlin will be forced to expropriate the export earnings of southern agrarian barons. It could let them cash out when the oil was expensive but now it just can't afford that. Which means agrarian barons will join the ranks of losers
Which leaves Kremlin with the only baronial group having a genuine interest in supporting its policies. The cannon fodder suppliers. But their loyalty is assured only for as long as the Kremlin can pay them. With the commodities going down, this is far from guaranteed. End of 🧵
Sources:
Central Bank and the CSR (Kudrin-led pro-Kremlin think tank) as well as the HH recruitment company statistics are open, anyone can access them. I used one more source, but not gonna name it. Also it's unpublished yet
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There are two ways for a poor, underdeveloped country to industrialise: Soviet vs Chinese way. Soviet way is to build the edifice of industrial economy from the foundations. Chinese way is to build it from the roof.
1st way sounds good, 2nd actually works.
To proceed further, I need to introduce a new concept. Let's divide the manufacturing industry into two unequal sectors, Front End vs Back End:
Front End - they make whatever you see on the supermarket shelf
Back End - they make whatever that stands behind, that you don’t see
Front End industries are making consumer goods. That is, whatever you buy, as an individual. Toys, clothes, furniture, appliances all falls under this category. The list of top selling amazon products gives a not bad idea what the front end sector is, and how it looks like.
Nation state is not some basic property of reality (as many falsely presume). They do not just organically grow out of the “ethnically drawn borders”. That is not how it works. They usually grow out of the *administratively* drawn borders, on whichever continent.
First they draw administrative borders based on whatever rationales and considerations. Then, these arbitrarily drawn administrative borders turn out to be surprisingly stable, more stable than anyone could ever expect. Eventually they become borders of the nation states.
States do not grow out of ethnicities. States grow out of the administrative zones, fiscal zones, customs zones et cetera. Basically, a Big Guy got a right to collect taxes and rents over these territories, but not those territories. Then the border between what he can milk…
Every election in the US attracts huge global attention. People in Pakistan, people in Paraguay, people in Poland, people in Papua New Guinea are monitoring the course of elections and tend to hold strong opinions regarding whom they would prefer to win
Why would that be the case? Well, one obvious reason would be that the US elections are, in fact, seen as the world elections. People in Paraguay do not vote in the US and yet, the US elections have a very strong impact on the fortunes of Paraguay.
Or Russia, in this case:
And I am not discussing the economic fortunes only. In terms of politics, in terms of culture, in terms of discourse, American relations with the rest of the world tend to be strikingly one-directional. Much or most of the global discourse comes downstream from the Unites States
There is hardly any other genre of literature more factual, and more realistic than the sci-fi. It is exactly its non-serious, seemingly abstract character that allows it to escape censorship and ostracism to a far greater degree than it is normally possible for a work of art.
Sci-fi allows you to to present the most painful, insulting, insufferable, obnoxious, criminal and traitorous arguments in a non-serious way, as a fun, as a joke. In this regard, it is far superior to any other genre. Compare three ways to sell a heresy:
By its very nature, sci-fi is inseparable from the social commentary. For this reason, quality sci-fi should be always read as a self-reflection and self-criticism of the society it is written in.
If the "Gulliver’s Travels" is a reflection on Britain…
Tatarstan is a large and wealthy ethnic republic located, in the very middle of Russia. While being culturally and institutionally distinctive, it is not really peripheral. It sits in a few kilometres from the population centre of Russia🧵
While Tatarstan does not sit in the centre of Russia geography-wise, it does so demography-wise. The Russian centre of population (red star), located somewhere in southwest Udmurtia, is literally in a walking distance from the Tatarstani border.
It is the very middle of Russia.
If you look at the Russian administrative map, you will see that most ethnic republics (colored) occupy a peripheral position. The main exception are republics of the Volga-Ural region (green), located in the middle of Russia & surrounded by the Slavic sea.
Wagner march was incredible, unprecedented to the extent most foreigners simply do not understand. Like, yes, Russia had its military coups in the 18th c. But those were the palace coups, all done by the Guards. Purely praetorian business with zero participation of the army.
Yes, there was a Kornilov affair in 1917, but that happened after the coup in capital. In March they overthrew the Tsar, then there was infighting in the capital, including a Bolshevik revolt in July, and only in September part of the army marches to St Petersburg.
Half a year after the coup. Not the same thing
I think the last time anything like that happened was in 1698, when the Musketeers marched on Moscow from the Western border. And then, next time, only in 2023.
(Army leaves the border/battlefield and marches on the capital without a previous praetorian coup in the capital)