A female medical resident who reported an accusation of sexual misconduct against a male supervisor –& then filed a lawsuit against the hospital & her university for failing to investigate that complaint– is now being sued by the supervisor for defamation. theglobeandmail.com/canada/article…
This is a story that highlights the risks that people face in raising accusations of wrongdoing in the workplace, but it also gets at the complicated employment relationship between hospitals, universities, physicians and medical residents.
It’s been nearly a year since Sophia Duong filed a complaint against Benedict Glover, but no findings have been released, and the matter is still unresolved. (She has been on stress leave. He was placed on leave pending the results of an investigation.)
Dr. Duong alleged in her claim that Dr. Glover, a prominent cardiologist at Sunnybrook, had coerced her into a sexual encounter by leveraging the position of power he had over her career. He has denied the allegations against him, including having any sexual contact with her.
The hospital and University of Toronto have said that the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario is investigating the allegation, and they are awaiting the result. (The CPSO would not confirm the existence of an investigation.)
Sunnybrook has said Dr. Glover is not an employee (because doctors in Canada operate as independent contractors.) Dr. Glover was also an associate prof at U of T, but the university also says his role as a clinical academic appointee doesn't constitute an employment relationship.
Where Dr. Duong is concerned, as a medical resident she reported to Sunnybrook each day for work, but was part of the U of T's internal medicine program. The question is: who is responsible for her? Who is responsible for him?
“I am taking the legal position – which is the correct position – that my client was owed every single employment protection that any other employee in this province has,” said Dr. Duong's lawyer, Kathryn Marshall.
For example, @Lawsome_ said, both institutions were required to investigate Dr. Duong's complaint and take action regardless of what the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario may have been doing.
Of note, in Sunnybrook's statement of defence, it said it was investigating another allegation of impropriety against Dr. Glover. The hospital had received a complaint from a departing employee that he had been having a consensual relationship with someone in his lab.
In filing his defence, Dr. Glover launched a counterclaim saying Dr. Duong has defamed him, and alleging she “invented these allegations for the improper purpose of coercing settlement monies.” He resigned both positions in March and is trying to move home to Ireland.
So in summary, if the CPSO were to substantiate Dr. Duong's allegation, the college only has authority inside Ontario, where he is no longer practising.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I just want to🚩that this issue of doctors not working directly for hospitals — in 🇨🇦, they're typically independent contractors who have privileges to work in hospitals but who bill the government directly for services — has now come up THREE times in recent stories I've done:
First, it was raised as one of the primary reasons that our health care system is so broken. Canadian health care is not integrated, which leads to massive waste and poor care. That doctors are paid one way and hospitals another is one example. theglobeandmail.com/canada/article…
Then it came up in this piece about Dr. Teresa Kieser who filed a human-rights case against Alberta Health Services, alleging years of pay inequity, pervasive sexism and gender-based discrimination. In its defence, AHS argued she's not an employee. theglobeandmail.com/canada/article…
This story began as an effort to understand how a few thousand unexpected sick patients could overwhelm hospitals in a province the size of Ontario, with its 14+ million people. I had always heard Canadian healthcare was broken. I had no idea how broken. theglobeandmail.com/canada/article…
The way one physician explained it really 🤯: Canadian "healthcare" is actually an insurance program. “What we have is a scheme that guarantees payment to physicians from public funds. That has nothing to do with having a public health-care system” said Dr. Dan Roberts.
Medicare was not about making the population healthier or keeping people out of hospitals. All it did was change where the bill was sent. There was no effort to integrate any of the pieces. And healthcare was already fractured, because each province has its own system.
POWER GAP: Canada has all the laws it needs to protect against gender discrimination in the workplace — but those laws are nearly impossible to enforce. As a result women are being forced to sign NDAs to get out of bad situations. theglobeandmail.com/canada/article…
The same kind of agreements that silenced Harvey Weinstein’s accusers & enabled his behaviour to continue for years are being used in Canada to resolve all manner of gender discrimination complaints: pay, promotion, pregnancy, bullying & sexual harassment theglobeandmail.com/canada/article…
Women are turning to these settlement agreements because the legal system that was established to deal with gender discrimination complaints - the human rights tribunal system - is so under-resourced it takes 2-4 years to get a hearing. theglobeandmail.com/canada/article…