Thread for PH/ID communicators, who have taken a centrist position between anti-vaxxer/COVID-deniers and "Zero-COVID Zealots":
What should young, triple-vaxxed people be doing during this BA.5 wave?
Should they be avoiding infection via respirators, ventilation/filtration?
/1
The vast majority of previously cautious people, now believe the Pandemic is over. They aren't masking, they go to crowded/indoor events.
Those of us still taking precautions are made to feel like extremists.
Do you think we're zealots for continuing to avoid infection?
/2
Many of the centrist communicators advocate for continued mask use.
Some will even nod towards improving ventilation/filtration.
(Although many are casting doubt on the effectivity/feasibility of these engineering interventions - despite this being outside their expertise).
/3
That doubt aside, I think many of the centrist communicators actually agree with those of us that are continuing to avoid infection.
If so, what is their plan/solution for convincing the 95% of society that has given in to the virus?
/4
Why has society given in?
There is a pervasive minimizing narrative re "mild" Omicron. The PH and media messaging is triple-vax-and-relax.
We've taken a PV-GBD (Post-Vax GBD) approach, which suggests there is no longer a need to take precaution.
/5
If the centrist communicators do not agree with PV-GBD, and they believe we should continue to avoid infection, they need to help communicate WHY.
The message isn't getting through.
WHY should people avoid infection if COVID is mild now for triple vaxxed people?
/6
I think the WHY is often avoided, because it's scary and can be seen as fearmongering.
Long COVID, continued severity with repeat infections, continued mutation of new variants, extraordinary uncertainty re long term effects of this virus, pediatric hepatitis, etc.
/7
But without addressing the WHY head-on, and raising the spectre of some of these possible long-term consequences, we will never sway the population to take this seriously again.
We have lost the battle to PV-GBD and repeat infections for all, even the immunocompromised.
/8
And what's worse.. the population that has given in to PV-GBD and the #InfectionMandate, has not been informed re. the downside risk of this approach.
There is no informed consent, because they have been deluded by this mild narrative.
/9
So.. instead of the hand-wringing over "Zero-COVID extremists" and "Fearmongering articles", perhaps you could use your enormous platform to help educate the masses that COVID is NOT over, that it still poses a significant risk, and that society needs to keep up the fight.
/10
Look outside your field to experts from other disciplines that are offering solutions, like @joeyfox85.
Do not pre-emptively discount and undermine these solutions, by casting doubt on their efficacy and feasibility.
Well well well... look who's suddenly trying to get on the right side of history. 👀
I guess we're officially allowed to consider SARS2 as a plausible hypothesis.... Rather than "exclude" it or dismiss it as "unlikely" before serology data was available.
The vast majority of the PH/ID MD COVID minimizers, were/are fervent Airborne-deniers.
They over-emphasized hand hygiene and sowed doubt in masks, HEPA filters and respirators.
I'm sure they were doling out this bad advice to close family and friends too.
1/5
I'm sure they were following this advice in their own lives. Shunning HEPA filters and respirators for gaping surgical masks.
Given this, how many of them likely got infected? How many times? How many onward transmissions did they fail to stop to and amongst family/friends?
2/5
How does one grapple with this? What do you tell yourself, your family, your friends who are anxious about their infection?
You contrive 2 truths: 1) Infection is inevitable 2) Infection is harmless
You then repeatedly state those truths, to reassure yourself and them.
3/5
How many Canadians heard one of his countless interviews on @cbcradio (where he declared the pandemic over, the virus mild, COVID mitigations useless, and infection to be inevitable/desired).. and then went on to catch/spread the virus to someone who died or was debilitated?
2/4
Why is the Medical Profession OK with this?
He actually said the quiet part out loud in June 2020.
He's pushing an #InfectionMandate for every man, woman and unvaccinated child.
.@tom_cardoso, @globeandmail why are you interviewing ID MDs about Respiratory PPE? Lynora Saxinger has muddied the science of Airborne Transmission and obstructed access to Respiratory PPE for 2 years. She and the other obstructionists are liable. They are not honest brokers. 1/
What training do these MDs have in Respiratory PPE and the physics of masks?
This would be like doing an investigative report on the Boeing 737MAX crashes, and only interviewing the Boeing and FDA executives that rubber stamped the negligent certification documents. 2/
Right off the bat... does this quote not strike you as odd? Have you seen a respirator? They are not individually fit/molded to a person's face. They are DESIGNED to fit, UNLIKE A SURGICAL MASK.
You know what mask forces air out the sides 100% of the time? A SURGICAL MASK. 3/