BREAKING: THREAD: late night DoJ 🔥🔥🔥SCORCHER🔥🔥🔥 just filed in the Bannon case. The filing is a motion to prevent Bannon from submitting his new “cooperation” offer to the committee as evidence in his contempt trial. FIRST: DoJ says too little too late. 1/
To little because he hasn’t agreed to submit documents per the subpoena he defied, and too late because “the criminal contempt statute is not intended to procure compliance: it is intended to punish past noncompliance.” YESSSSS 2/
Also, DoJ says Bannon’s timing suggests “the only thing that has really changed since he refused to comply with the subpoena in October 2021 is that he is finally about to face the consequences of his decision to default.” Then DoJ gets into the FBI interview with COSTELLO 3/
Including that Costello LIED to the committee. “that the Defendant's attorney misrepresented to the Committee what the former
President's counsel had told the Defendant's attorney” among other things. This tells me COSTELLO could be in trouble as I suspected. 4/
And finally the DoJ points out that Bannon’s attorney works for TRUMP and is being paid for by Trump’s PAC as reported recently by the Times. 5/
And here’s the sign off. I’m sorry, but Matt Graves is a bad ass and were lucky to have him as the US Attorney in DC. To sum up: DoJ says no, your last minute deal won’t save you, no you can’t delay your trial, and your lawyer is a piece of shit, too. 6/
We’ll see what the judge says tomorrow. Bannon’s trial is set to begin next week. END/
PS: justin Clark is the trump attorney mentioned above that DoJ interviewed about this case on June 29. He’s the one that told the FBI that Donald. Ever invoked privilege and that he told Bannon’s lawyer as much. 👀
PPS: man we’re all up late. Haha
JUST IN: judge strikes down all of Bannon’s bullshit motions AND he cannot DELAY his trial. He can’t subpoena Pelosi. He can’t argue trump’s non-existent privilege. Bannon is fucked. Trial starts July 18.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mueller, She Wrote

Mueller, She Wrote Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MuellerSheWrote

Jul 12
There were PHYSICAL FIGHT challenges in the 12/18 meeting. POWELL testified that she sought to see the president without an appointment, and they had about 15 minutes alone with donald. "I bet cipollone set a land speed record." 1/
CIPOLLONE: i walked in. i saw flynn and powell. I was not happy to see them there. The Overstock person was there. I looked at him and asked "who are you". I don't think any of these people were providing the president with good advice. 2/
Cipollone didn't understand how they had gotten in. POWELL says trump was very interested in what she was saying for those 15 minutes. HERSCHMANN testified that FLYNN took out a diagram that supposedly showed who was communicating with voting machines... 3/
Read 8 tweets
Jul 12
Wasn’t there a JUST a story that DOJ HAS been discussing the implications of indicting Donald? And now a story that they don’t talk about him? Which is it? WAIT! Is the media playing both sides? Follow the facts and make your own call. I’m sick of the sideshow. 1/
Source: Ken Dilanian. Who has me blocked ever since he mistakenly declared the Mueller report exonerated Donald. He says DoJ talks about Donald all the time AND he says there’s no evidence Donald is a target of any investigation which is also incorrect. 2/ nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna3… Image
There IS evidence Donald is a target including the fact that we’ve seen more than one federal grand jury subpoena seeking info about him and one that names him SPECIFICALLY asking Navarro for all communication with Donald. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Jul 11
Let's run a hypothetical. Let's say the DoJ indicts donald TODAY as many are calling for. Let's say he's indicted for 1512(c)2: obstructing an official proceeding. And let's say that the DoJ's star witness for this trial it Pat Cipollone. 1/
Let's say the DoJ has grand jury testimony from Cipollone that he heard donald tell meadows that he knew he lost & was going to send the mob to the capitol to delay or impede the electoral count of Biden's victory. Let's say their WHOLE case hinged on this important testimony 2/
Then let's say in August, the DoJ gets the Cipollone transcripts and video from the 1/6 committee, and they find out that Cipollone told the committee that he heard donald tell SCAVINO that he knew he lost and was going to send the mob to impede the count. 3/
Read 6 tweets
Jul 11
BREAKING: Y’all! Bannon’s trial begins MONDAY. Finally, Justice is coming!! He faces MINIMUM 30 days and max 2 years. He is a convicted felon so his sentencing guidelines should be above the minimum.
Many are asking “wouldn’t it be 60 days minimum because there are two counts”? Yes and no. The judge could order the two sentences be served concurrently (at the same time) and not consecutively (back to back), so the absolute minimum is 30 days. I asked Preet :)
Here’s where I asked Preet back in June.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 11
The December 19 “will be wild” tweet was an overt signal. I’ve mentioned that DoJ has brought the tweet up in MULTIPLE criminal indictments for seditious conspiracy, and I’ve said that’s a sign TRUMP is under direct criminal investigation. 👀 1/
Read 8 tweets
Jul 9
THREAD: Zoe Lofgren says the hearing Tuesday will be a “dot connecting exercise”. Since connecting the dots is my favorite thing, here are a few I’d like to see connected. We know the hearing will be about the relationship between the White House and the Capitol violence. 1/
One of the crucial Eastman emails is the famous “I implore you to consider one more relatively minor violation” of the law. He sent this to Pence’s counsel Greg Jacob on the evening of 1/6. He was trying to get Pence to delay the count for 10 days. 2/
This would have given the trump camp more time to pressure state legislatures to certify all those fraudulent slates of electors. But get this. The REASON Eastman felt comfortable asking Pence to break the law a little more is spelled out in the first half of that email. 3/
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(