1. It's hilarious to still come across videos from self-styled apologists in India repeating the outdated, now debunked lie which goes like this:
"Dionysius Exiguus, the 6th century monk dated the birth of Jesus to Dec 25th based on the year of the founding of the Roman empire."
2. The date for the founding of the Roman empire itself is shrouded in mystery. Imagine how accurate the dating for Jesus is.
Modern #ChristianMythologists fraudulently promoted that every historical event is dated based on the birth of Jesus. This is the greatest lie ever told.
3. The Christian calendar (A.D/B.C.) was not invented until the 6th century. Does that mean historical events in that part of the world were not dated until the 6th century? Of course, they were. Events weren't waiting for the #JesusBirthMyth to be created for being given a date.
4. The first Christians for whom Jesus was only a mythical, celestial being and not an earthly being, used the Jewish calendar for their festivals and dating their events. Early #ChristianMythologists employed the Roman system of dating events according to the reigns of emperors.
5. Later some Christians quit the Roman system & began to date their calendars from the "Age of Martyrs" a particularly bloody period of persecution under Emperor Diocletian (284-305 C.E.).
Interestingly, the Bible doesn't specify a date for the birth of its central hero.
6. The #BiblicalSmoke about Jesus mentions Herod the Great & portrays him as the villain of the Jesus birth fiction. The #BibleMytholgy refers to him as the monster who killed all the babies under 2 yrs old in Bethlehem. We know from real history that Herod died in 4 B.C.E.
7. That means at the time of Herod’s baby killing spree, Jesus had to be under 2. Means he would've had to be born anywhere between 7 B.C.E. to 4 B.C.E. So, how did the date 1 A.D. come about?
Well, the only answer is whoever did the calculation is a fraudster or a dunce.
8. The Christian calendar is based on a miscalculation. This truth is an accepted view among many mainstream Christian scholars. They placed the birth of their hero sometime between 7 B.C.E. & 2 B.C.E. John Barton, professor of Bible interpretation at Oxford, is one such scholar.
9. He said "most academics agreed that the Christian calendar was wrong & that J would've had to be born several yrs earlier than commonly thought. There's no reference to when he was born in the Bible. All we know is that he was born in the reign of Herod, who died before 1A.D..
10. ..The idea of celebrating his birth during the darkest part of the year is probably linked to pagan traditions and the winter solstice."
The most shocking revelation comes from the very org that invented the myth in the 1st place & the calendar in the 2nd –the Roman Church.
11. Pope Benedict, leader of the world’s 1 bn Roman Catholics admitted to the fact that the Christian calendar is based on a miscalculation. The Pope added other controversaries that contrary to the traditional belief, there were no oxen, donkeys or other animals at J’s birth.
13. What the pope forgot to add is the missing mention of the virgin birth in the #JesusBirthMyth. Probably, he left the task of admitting to that fraud to future popes. After all, Poppa knows that his flock can't take the facts about their dark history all at once.
14. It took this many centuries for all the other skeletons that we know today, to tumble out of Christianity's closet. The #VirginBirthMyth too will, soon. It's just a matter of time!
Satan, my alter ego, the Most Truthful One, will not rest until the truth is all out!
Question is, 'who made this grand mistake that slaps Christianity hard in its face & makes its followers look like dunces for celebrating a make-believe birthday of their savior hero?'
It was the 6th century monk known as Dionysius Exiguus, also called Dennis the Little.
"The calculation of the beginning of our calendar — based on the birth of Jesus — was made by Dionysius Exiguus, who made a mistake in his calculations by several years.” - Pope Benedict, The Infant Narratives.
2. True @NameisNani. You were talking abt the ppl & not the customs. Why didn't you talk about how Christians demonize Hindu rituals? You should have asked me and I would have given you a ton of examples from my own family & so-called friends. You got gall to debate me on this?
3. Ironically the film written/directed by Vivek Athreya, a Brahmin, is abt a Brahmin Sundar & a Christian Leela trying to convince thr resp parents of their marriage.
Athreya conveniently paints Leela's fam as progressive/tolerant; Sundar's fam as foolishly orthodox/intolerant.
What Abrahamics have & Hindus lack is a physical platform where families commune every week along with their kids, even as young as infants, share ideas of growth & development of their resp. religious group, discuss concerns, keep up brotherhood, demand govt to listen to them..
Churches & mosques serve as that place for the other two communities. Worshipping their respective deities is just a small part of the activity in their so-called places of worship.
Where are such places for Hindus? How long will we whine that temples were taken away from us?
Who's stopping us from creating our own physical spaces now? Why foreign fund? Not all churches run on foreign fund. A ton of them are established thru local member funds. Why can't we do that?
Hindu community (minus the seculars) has the best minds. Why not put that to use?
Christians that claim that their god YHWH is not author of evil must go back to the basics of their religion.
In the early stages of Jewish theology YHWH & "the satan" were used interchangeably. As their theology evolved Satan became a proper noun & a separate being from YHWH.
Christians: Bible god, YHWH is the source of morality in humans.
Scholars: taking the Bible seriously will make YHWH a hateful racist sexist monster- the opposite of what Christians claim. Either he is a figment of imagination of barbaric ancient men or he's really a monster.
Let's see who is right- Christians or the critical scholars.
YHWH tortures/punishes ppl for no reason other than to just satisfy his ego or to win a "bet" or to simply prove he is "Lord." He doesn't spare even innocent babies, pregnant women &even animals who are programed.
1. Beginning in the Garden of Eden, he pronounces punishment on Adam&Eve's future progeny, who had nothing to do with the so-called sin of Adam&Eve. Genesis 3:16-18. 2. Punishes the 1st born sons and slave girls who had nothing to do with Egyptian slavery.
Exodus 11.5.
The Catholic Church tortured & killed those that simply rejected their teachings; burnt at stake those that questioned them.
But somehow spared Martin Luther - the guy who led a whole protest against Catholicism, nearly uprooting their dominion. Ever wondered why?
Read on...
By 16th c. the Church became v powerful & dominant. Thereby corrupt. It had immense political & spiritual power over the Roman empire and the emperor.
It made salvation a business enterprise. It began selling INDULGENCES saying ppl's punishment for sins could be reduced.
What are INDULGENCES?
Catholic Christianity of that time taught that sin was of 2 types: Mortal sin which directly earned hell after death & Venal sin which was a few years of purification in purgatory - an interim state between life on earth & eternal life in heaven.
The surprise of Christendom at the mention of a possible conversion angle in #LavanyaSuicide case is interesting. Its collective effort to debunk the kid's dying declaration is beyond pathetic.
The church is acting as if missionary schools are not Hindu-soul-harvesting grounds!
Whether or not force to convert is the reason behind a young woman taking her own life, it cannot be ruled out that missionary schools are the breeding grounds for proselytization in gen. & Catholic schools are the places where Catholic institutions get their new nuns from.
Lavanya studied in Sacred Heart Girls' Higher Secondary School, Thanjavur. This school was a missionary effort of Franciscan Missionaries of Mary, founded by Mary of Passion in 1877, in Ootacamund, in British India. The Order established many other proselytizing institutions.