Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost just said that his office has no evidence of a raped ten-year-old child who was impregnated, including a request for lab results. He also noted that Ohio law would have allowed for an abortion in such a case.
...The Washington Post recently reported that it could not confirm the story attributed to Dr. Caitlan Barnard who has refused to speak with the media seeking to confirm the story, including the Post. washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/…
...There should be a police report in Ohio because a doctor is required to report such a rape. In such a case, Yost's office would be involved through any lab testing that would be to be done to confirm DNA evidence. Yost says there is no such submission.
...What is curious is that Dr. Caitlan Barnard did television interviews on the rape case on MSNBC. Yet, she has not been willing to confirm that she notified police about a child rapist or any of the facts in the case, including why it was legally necessary to go to Indiana.
...Ohio allows for abortion not only to protect the life of the mother but also "to prevent a serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman."codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-c…
...It is hard to see how a ten year old is not facing a risk of death or serious injury under the law. It is the same disconnect with claim that these laws prevent treatment of ectopic pregnancies despite the threat to the life of the mother. jonathanturley.org/2022/07/11/the…
...Yost's comment came on Fox Primetime and he stated that his office has been looking for evidence of the case and the required reporting of a child rapist.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We recently discussed a Georgetown professor supporting "the mob" being more aggressive with protests targeting justices.jonathanturley.org/2022/05/11/the… Now another Georgetown professor is denouncing the Supreme Court as "lawless" and demanding activism from "genuine" faculty...
...Professor Feldman is demanding that faculty use their positions to "protest against and change to institutions and actors who disingenuously hold themselves out as acting in accord with and on behalf of law."...
...There was a time when such a demand would have been viewed as inimical to academic freedom and free speech on faculties. Today this intolerance for opposing views is celebrated and echoed at many universities. jonathanturley.org/2022/07/08/dou…
Yesterday, I noted that President Biden seemed to mangle the Griswold case in his remarks on abortion. While the White House corrected his misnaming of the case, it left the curious description of the landmark case...whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
..."What century are they in? There used to be a case called — Connecticut v. Griswold [Griswold v. Connecticut], which was declared unconstitutional in the late ‘60s. It said a married couple in the privacy of their bedroom could not decide to use contraception"...
It was a bit confusing since Griswold case upheld such rights, but the more concerning part of the President's remarks was the suggestion that the Dobbs decision threatens to take away this right despite the express statements to the contrary by the Court. jonathanturley.org/2022/06/27/wha…
The Administration waited for a Friday afternoon to issue its verdict on the border agents. As predicted last year, it will punish the agents for administrative violations. They must be punished in light of the President's earlier proclamation of guilt... jonathanturley.org/2021/10/04/bid…
...I wrote last year that they would do so “by changing the question. For example, what began as an investigation into whether agents used reins to whip migrants might be converted into a long investigation into the use of horses in crowd control operations...
...That will take a lot of time and, when the report is issued, the actual whipping allegation can be buried in a broader policy debate. That will allow the media, as well as the administration, to focus on the policy as opposed to the personnel involved.”
Waiting for the President's speech on protecting abortion rights. It is a curious position for a President who long supported the Hyde Amendment barring the use of federal funds for abortions...
...Indeed, not only did the President previously reject the notion of abortion as a right but he repeatedly voted against compromise legislation on the Hyde Amendment allowing for exceptions for rape and incest...
... Now however he faces a base demanding that that he get "angrier" and indeed be "absolutely furious." politico.com/news/2022/07/0… I am not sure that the President can convincingly satisfy the rage demand...
If the letter prompts arrests, we could see a major free speech challenge in the courts. The timing of the letter, however, is particularly interesting and may reflect a recognition of the limits of the federal law. jonathanturley.org/2022/07/03/190…
...There is also an interesting question of whether Marshal Curley consulted with Chief Justice John Roberts. If Roberts green lighted the letters, he is directly involved in the decision and effectively endorsed the underlying interpretation (and use) of the state laws...
...Roberts would not be the only one with conflict issues. All of the justices would be beneficiaries of such enforcement, but the six conservative justices are the subject of these specific protests.
The President calling for another exception today to the filibuster rule repeats the mistake of his former colleague Harry Reid when as Majority Leader he ended the rule for Supreme Court nominations...
...While some of us warned that it would prove costly to Democrats when they lost the majority, they ignored the advice. Ironically, the current Court (which the President has continued to attack) is the result of that ill-considered decision...
...What is most striking is that the Democrats may be only a couple months away from losing the majority again. Yet, they are again calling for the reduction or elimination of a rule protecting the minority...