Watching episode 4, season 9 of "Digging for Britain".
Nice finds;
Roman barrel flask made of glass, perhaps used to store perfume or wine.
Found in an early Medieval (the era formerly known as "dark" ages) grave in Cambridge.
1500 year old brooch found on the skeleton where it most likely kept a cloak together.
On the back there were mineralised traces of textile!
God I love this so much.
I want to touch it.
I wouldn't, even if left alone with this object, but goodness I want to.
This is from an object found elsewhere, a finer weave.
Comparing finds like these tell us a lot about what kind of fabrics people had back then.
This may be a continuation, again, of Roman techniques.
Another example of the Roman collapse being less collaps-y than long thought.
I love this.
The reaction of a historian (Onyeka Nubia) when he saw the brooch with remains of 1500 year old fabric.
That's love and it's so contagious.
Seeing someone so passionate about history makes makes me want to buy him a drink.
Welcome to the club Mr. Nubia, although I have a sneaking suspicion you already knew the dark ages weren't so dark ;)
In Leicester, in 2017 they found two Roman streets with incredibly well preserved houses from 250AD.
With mosaics, underfloor heating, etc.
But a small bit of metalwork made a bigger impression on archaeologists & historians...
A Roman bronze key handle showing several boys with on top a long haired bearded man wearing trousers (!) fighting what is called a lion but could also be a wolf I reckon.
It looks like there are remnants of colour on it!
Trousers weren't much of a thing in the Roman empire, beards and long hair were also not fashionable much, so it's most likely a barbarian, one of the non-Romans in Europe.
Some say it depicts a fight/execution in an amphitheatre but I'm not sure.
I'm not an expert on this so my opinion has no real value here, but to me this scene seems almost heroic, it has a certain admiration in it.
Yes, it's a barbarian but he appears to be fighting a wild beast to protect children.
I think it may depict the story of a hero.
Which would also make sense to see it on a key, after all a key also protects a house, family or something precious.
Or was this a barbarian who defeated a lion in the amphitheatre to save his children and thus gained respect from Romans?
Maybe?
I have no idea.
Another stunning find; a Roman toilet/manicure set!
Very fancy.
Look at the colours!
You can watch the episode here it you live within the Roman, I mean British empire, I mean UK, or if you are a sneaky Celt who uses VPN or something although that might be naughty and not allowed, I have no idea, I wouldn't know. ;) bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Found another gem on the Dutch real estate website Funda, but it also made me angry because modern people have done modern stuff to it and somehow that's not a reason to put them in jail apperantly.
Weird.
Anyway, MEDIEVAL house!
Sort of. funda.nl/detail/koop/wo…
So although altered many times, it originally was built in the 14th century.
What do you reckon, are those tiles old?
The ceiling is gorgeous but the decor and that weird glass wall... ew.
Gorgeous fireplace, splendid ceiling, horrific kitchen.
When will they ever learn?
Old house = no do modern stuff!
NO.
Bad interior designer, bad owners, no treats.
I found several examples online but most of them mention no source, publication date or any other details that make the examples trustworthy, some claim to be from Penthouse.
They do appear genuine though.
This 1942 article was found by @RealDanGill, sadly I can't find the whole issue online so can't read what happens in the story:
One of the many things we think are weird/gross about the middle ages is the idea of people sharing their homes with animals, especially cattle.
But is this true?
Did they really have cows & sheep walking around their living room?
Let's research.
A thread.
I regularly hear this being mentioned as just another bit of evidence of how dirty & backwards medieval people were and that it's no wonder they got all those diseases, were covered in filth all the time, etc.
Especially this image is often used, it's nice but is it accurate?
Let's first think about it logically and rationally.
Would you like to have animals walking around your home?
Do you think medieval people wouldn't mind the feces & urine splattering on their precious belongings, clothing, bedding, etc?
Let's look at an old painting together, see what we can learn from it.
This time a naughty one; a brothel scene from 1537 by the Brunswick Monogrammist, an anonymous Netherlandish painter.
Such an improper subject, so you better not check out this thread, look away now.
A bit more about the artist:
We start with the birdcage by the door, the cage symbolises proper love, the bird a woman.
So a woman 'caged' by love is protected but a bird outside the cage is free.
This bird is locked, the door shut. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brunswick…
I love the writing on the wall, quite high above the door, someone needed a ladder for this.
I wish I could read it, they might be names, perhaps of regulars?
Naughty boys.
A few days ago I complained about a Guardian article using a bad photo from a film in an article about Joan Clarke, a Bletchley Park code breaker, but... something much worse might have happened...
I don't think this photo they used is of Joan...
@TeaKayB pointed this out to me and I was stunned, surely not, that would be extraordinary sloppy.
So I looked into it, of course.
For starters the image they used is flipped, here's the full picture as it should look: