May 1, 1748, George Whitefield preached to "a large company of Negroes" as well as "a number of white people who came to hear what I had to say to them," nearly 1500 people in all:
"I said, their hearts were as black as their faces"
😳
Whitefield had prayed for "divine" "wisdom" in order to preach just the right message to Black people. He wanted to "touch the negroes, yet not to give them the least umbrage to slight or behave imperiously to their masters"
iow, he needed them to be "good christian slaves"
Black people had expected Whitefield to "speak against their masters."
GW: "Blessed be God, that I was directed not to say any thing to masters at all, though my text led me to it"
He went *against* the grain of the text to *avoid* preaching on the sins/duties of white people
And then he dresses it all up in spiritual sounding scriptural language:
"Everything is beautiful in its season. Lord, teach me always that due season, wherever I am called, to give either black or white, a portion of thy word!"
you can find this in:
Memoirs of the Life of the Reverend George Whitefield (1772*), pages 165–166
Needless to say (but I'll say it), this mingling of white supremacy and evangelism was a corruption the doctrine of sin ("black as their faces"), and hence salvation (saved from blackness to ... ???).
Not going to lie, I did not expect to see @chuckswindoll open up his book on Elijah with a tribute to Confederate general Robert E. Lee, and a reference to the "fine volume"
on Lee by neo-confederate J. Steven Wilkins:
If you picked Joni Eareckson Tada's daily devotional back in 1998, on the second day--January 2--you'd get some Bill Gothard, and a reference to __Institute in Basic Live Principles__
an incredible artifact of an industry promoting quiverfull / patriarchy / stay-at-home-daughter / neo-confederacy / homeschooling / providential American history / warfare
The Assessment Report is public, so what are we —in the public—to make of these conflicting claims? What criteria should we use to evaluate them? And fundamentally, it raises the question of who is assessing the assessors, and how? Are there any checks and balances here?
You know how when you take a wrong turn, you need to go back and take the other turn?
I've decided I'm doing that with Critical Race Theory--I'm going back to before all the CRT hysteria and alarmism, back before the Anti-CRT Industry® took off, back before the book bans
"Contrary to certain evangelical Christians, critical race theorists and social scientists argue that racism is systemic, and is deeply ingrained in the structural fabric of the U.S"