1/Millions of Shiʿi Muslims around the world will be celebrating what they consider the appointment and designation of ʿAlī b. Abī Ṭālib as the legitimate successor to the Prophet Muḥammad. A short thread on #EidGhadir.
2/The "investiture" of ʿAlī according to the Shiʿi sources took place on 18 Dhu l-Ḥijjah in 10 H (= March 632 AD) at a pond between Mecca and Medina, known as Ghadīr Khumm. What do they sources say happened exactly?
3/Medieval sources differ little in the wording and historical memory of the events at Ghadīt Khumm in 632 AD, which came shortly after Muḥammad's Farewell Sermon. The formulaic wording is common to all the medieval sources. It reads: من كنت مولاه فعلي مولاه
4/The formulation, translated into English, reads, “O people! Of whomsoever I am a master, Ali is his master. Am I not closer to you than your own selves?”
5/Appearing in proto-Sunni/Sunni and Shiʿi sources the formulaic words attributed to Muḥammad is a contested on theological and philological grounds. The Sunni view is best represented by the thirteenth century historian and exegete Ibn Kathīr (d. 1373).
6/Ibn Kathīr rejects the Shiʿi claim that Ghadīr was an investiture of ʿAlī as Muḥammad's successor. He explains that his predecessor al-Ṭabarī writing in the tenth century AD tackled the event of Ghadīr dealing with its historicity and theological implication
7/Put simply, Ghadīr was little more than an attempt by Muḥammad to pacify some companion who became especially angry with ʿAlī during the campaign at the Yemen, complaining that ʿAlī acted unfairly and greedily when distributing the booty
8/The Shiʿi reading of the events at Ghadīr disagrees. According to standard Shiʿi narrative the episode was an investiture where Muḥammad appointed his legatee, namely ʿAlī. We read in the Shiʿi sources - exegetical & historical - that Quran 5.3 was revealed shortly after.
9/That is, when Muḥammad designated ʿAlī as his successor, the following verses came down, according to Shiʿi and a small minority of Sunni exegetes: "This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion
10/In a clear rejection of the Shiʿi point of view, Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 1328) takes a firm stance, explaining that there is nothing in the ḥadīth [of Ghadīr] to support the Shiʿi claim of investiture.
11/In response, Shiʿi theologian and historians level the following rebuttals. One, the wording of Muḥammad went beyond intent to assuage anger. The linguistic context of the sermon, they argue, lends credence to an investiture or appointing of legatee.
12/Ibn Muṭahhar al-Ḥillī (d. 1325) in his Minhāj al-karāmah explains that God commanded His prophet to make a proclamation that shall seal the divine favour and complete the revelation. Ḥillī is adamant that Sunni exgetes recognise the occasion of revelation to refer to Ghadīr
13/We learn from the sources that Muḥammad's now formulaic saying, "whoever I am the mawla of, then ʿAlī too is their mawla," was preceded by reminder where Muḥammad asked the congregation present whether he commands authority over them, using a derivative of the term "mawla"
14/Second, the Shiʿis maintain that the proclamations at Ghadīr marked a culmination of numerous sayings of Muḥammad hinting or explicitly pointing to ʿAlī's credential as a likely successor. Ḥillī, for example, says there was as much as 40 such references in Quran and ḥadīth.
15/Third, Shiʿis further argue that the earliest companions and their successors especially the family of Muḥammad saw Ghadīr as an investiture of ʿAlī imamate, or leadership as the successor of Muḥammad.
16/The twentieth-century bibliographer ʿAbd al-Ḥusayn al-Amīnī (d. 1970) compiled the data that includes early views on Ghadīr. He published his findings in an 11-volume compendium consisting of over 5,500 pages, titled الغدير في الكتاب والسنة والأدب
17/For instance, al-Amīnī recounts incidents in history when prominent companions invoked the incident of Ghadīr to support their claim that ʿAlī was the rightful successor to Muḥammad often during heated theological disputes known as احتجاجات
18/Medieval sources describe the reception of the Day of Ghadir in Muslim memory. There are accounts from early 10th century AD historians onwards that the day was celebrated in public.
19/The medieval sources also speak of earlier celebrations to mark the Day of Ghadir, including celebrations held by the Imams, such as al-Riḍā (d. 818), who is reported to have said the Day of Ghadir is a عيد ʿĪd. FIN.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Described in popular & academic writings as ‘scientific academy, institution of knowledge, premodern centre of learning, or univ-library,’ the House of Wisdom (بيت الحكمة) in medieval Baghdad is a fine example of modern fanciful imaginations back-projected into history. A 🧵1/
Did the House of Wisdom really exist? If so, what was its function? Two historiographical approaches can be discerned in modern scholarship: maximalist & minimalist positions. The maximalists offer imaginary reconstructions on basis of one-line references in sources 2/
Example of maximalists readings are Y. Eche, Les bibliothèques arabes publiques et semi-publiques en Mésopatamia, Syrie, Egypte au Moyen Age (1967), offering almost 50 pages of description on the basis of a handful of short excerpts in Arabic sources. 3/
In his الكشف عن مناهج الادلة, Averroes, dedicates a chapter to the various proofs for the demonstrability of God’s existence in which he surveys and critiques the viewpoints of the major intellectual traditions in Islam. 1/
The major traditions are: the Ashʿaris, whom he says are representative of the Sunnis; the Muʿtazilis; the Sufis, whom he describes as bāṭiniyya (esotericists); and the Ḥashawiyyah, the stern literalists. 2/
The Ḥashwiyya, who believed scripture was fundamental and ought to be read and interpreted literally, advocated an uncritical acceptance of God’s existence based on the outer (al-ẓāhir) expressions of the Qurʾan. 3/
In 2017 al-Azhar (traditionally described as dogmatic magisterium of contemporary Sunnism) refused to declare terror group ISIS as guilty of kufr, or unbelief. Takfir, or the accusation of unbelief, is a complex issue in Islam. Some preliminary remarks to follow in thread 1/
Takfir is accusing someone—Muslim—of holding deviant beliefs or committing actions indicative of unbelief. Takfir leads to pronouncements of apostasy (ارتداد), which in Islamic penal law can lead to corporal punishment, or death 2/
Earliest discussions of takfir can be found in Qur’an which warns sternly against accusations of unbelief. Two verse stand out: 4:94 & 40:28. “Do not say to someone who offers you greeting of peace, ‘you are not a believer.” 3/
A thread on Aqa Bozorg Tehrani (d. 1970), the inimitable bio-bibliographer who penned over 55,000 entries, 15,000 pages on Shii authors, list of extant & lost manuscripts around the world, in sciences, theology, philosophy, history, linguistics, hadith, Quran, etc. 1/
Unknown to many is that Aqa Bozorg collaborated with another two Shi’i scholars, Hasan Sadr & M Husayn Kashif Ghita. Together they responded to claim of Lebanese historian, Jujri Zaydan (d. 1914) that Shi’i authors played insignificant role in making of Islamic civilisation 2/
Sadr authored تأسيس الشيعة الكرام لعلوم الإسلام, while K al-Ghita penned المراجعات الريحانية as rebuttal to Zaydan. Tehrani, Sadr, & K Ghita showed that Shi’i authors broached main Islamic sciences & were pivotal in making of Islamic traditions. 3/
Medieval Muslim sources speak of a Jewish sect that believed in the prophethood of Muḥammad. Who were they? A mini-thread 🧵🧵 1/
We read al-Juwaynī's (d. 1085) Kitāb al-irshād, a sophisticated kalām work full of gems, “a sect among the Jews, called al-ʿIsāwiyya, believed in the prophethood of Muḥammad, peace upon him..." 2/
Al-Juwaynī objective is to bring rational proofs in favour of the prophethood of Muḥammad by anchoring his argument in the doctrine of abrogation (naskh) 3/
(1) In 1978 John Wansborough published his Sectarian Milieu, arguing that most of Quranic material characterise a text that crystallised over 2 centuries, and largely outside confines of Arabia. To date Fred Donner has offered perhaps the best response to Wansboroug. Thread
(2)Donner is not convinced of Wansborough's claim that both the Quran and the ḥadīth (which latter calls "sub-canonical" versions of the Quranic material) belong to the same historical circumstance, that is, both coalesced around the same time and in same locality.
(3)Donner argues that the differences between the Quran and ḥadīth are so vast and fundamental that one cannot but rule out the plausibility of both of them coming into their own at the same time and place. Let's consider a few examples.