Based on traffic to PlainSite over the past week, Nigeria's interest in Bola Tinubu's money laundering past dwarfs global interest in Elon Musk. plainsite.org/dockets/2jqi9o…
Tinubu committed 5 crimes per the IRS CI affidavit:
1. Money laundering (18 U.S.C. § 1956) 2. Using funds from unlawful activity (18 U.S.C. § 1957) 3. Bank fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1344) 4. Failure to file tax returns (26 U.S.C. § 7203) 5. Lying to federal agents (18 U.S.C. § 1001)
@DavidHundeyin Nigerian press should be asking where Mr. Tinubu found the nearly $4.5 million in funds to pay for the (at least) two Brooklyn condos. Habibat Tinubu is connected to two Delaware LLCs: WWOMD LLC and Oyinda LLC. (Why are these LLCs necessary?) If these investments were paid for...
...with funds derived from illegal activities (bribery, corruption, etc.) then Tinubu may have committed additional overt acts in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 and 1957. Certainly these are legitimate questions for any public official, let alone a presidential candidate.
U.S. press, also take note: our legal protections are stronger than anywhere else on Earth. We can ask questions like these without fear of retribution (as in Nigeria) or bogus libel lawsuits (as in the U.K.).
So. Where does Tinubu's money come from, and why the USDOJ free pass?
Updated! Twitter, Inc. v. Elon R. Musk, X Holdings I, Inc., and X Holdings II, Inc.: plainsite.org/dockets/4umos4… $TWTR $TSLA
This reads far more like Musk hunting for information about his critics, and not at all like the request of someone concerned primarily about fake accounts. Actual platform-wide account data itself is not necessary to make judgments about the company's process! $TWTR
Musk wants to know what you have been searching for on Twitter. $TWTR
@DavidHundeyin What are the chances that someone unhappy about the court records on our website made a false report of "malicious software" on the page to Google? We have never had a report like this before. There is no malicious software, of course.
@DavidHundeyin There are over 14 million court dockets on PlainSite. According to Google, the only one that reportedly has a problem—the first since 2011—involves Bola Tinubu.
Some Nigerian news websites have been posting claims like this one: "Trouble For Bola Tinubu As US Court Releases Records Of His Drug Money Forfeiture Trial." This is not quite right. The court records have been public since 1993. We just posted them on PlainSite.
PACER does not typically have records for cases before 2001 because the courts worked mainly on paper then. Obtaining paper records usually means a request to the National Archives. Fortunately, in this case, someone else had already done that and we found them on another site.
What we were able to do is break up the records to make them clearly correspond to the docket entries in the public court record.
$TSLA sold fewer new cars, used cars, and completely fake data artifacts than expected this past quarter based on one of its several definitions of the term "deliveries," which is intended to defraud investors. reuters.com/business/autos…
For additional context on the largest corporate fraud in history, which is ongoing as of this afternoon, see the thread below. $TSLA
Judges ignore facts up and down the federal judiciary every day, from the district courts to the Supreme Court. Here's a recent opinion from Judge James Donato in Greenspan v. Qazi et al, in which he says that @AaronGreenspan's book and photograph had "no known commercial value."
@AaronGreenspan Even after the above images of check payments were filed under oath as part of a declaration in the case, Judge Donato responded by ignoring them and refusing to admit that he had made an error. Instead, he put the word "errors" in quotation marks, as if it were crazy to suggest.
The error is crucial. Whether or not the book and photograph are worth anything is part of fair use analysis under copyright law. Had the copyright claim been allowed to survive the motion to dismiss—which it also should have under Supreme Court precedent—Donato would not have...