Peter Calloway Profile picture
Jul 18, 2022 18 tweets 5 min read Read on X
The Drug War is officially back on in San Francisco. For the first time in years, people are being prosecuted for simply using drugs or possessing paraphernalia. It’s hard to fully comprehend the harm this will cause. I’ll try to lay it out below.
First, a bit of background. For a long time, San Francisco has generally declined to use armed government agents to enforce restrictions on what ppl can put in their bodies or hold in their hands.
That’s because prosecuting drug users (and dealers, for that matter) goes against all available science and evidence on how to reduce drug use. You cannot arrest and imprison your way out of it. That’s been tried before—repeatedly, across the country, for decades. Does not work.
As a nation, we’ve spend hundreds of billions of $$ over decades trying this approach. What do we have to show for it? More people in prison and jail than any other country in the history of the world. Entire communities devastated. Generational trauma. Incalculable suffering.
The new DA, Brooke Jenkins, posed as a progressive while she was jockeying to be appointed to the office once the former DA, Chesa Boudin, was recalled with her help. It didn’t take long for her to show her true colors.
In the first week, she essentially disbanded units in the office responsible for things like undoing wrongful convictions, prosecuting cops for murder and excessive force, and sharing with the public all the data on who the office prosecutes, for what, and what outcome.
Now, she’s started charging people for possessing substances the government says it’s a crime to have, and for having paraphernalia. This will dramatically increase the number of arrests in San Francisco and likely cause the jail population to explode.
Many people will remain in jail while they await trial because they can’t afford to pay money bail to be released (Jenkins announced she would again use money bail in this way).
People will be beaten by the police. Some may be killed. These outcomes are inevitable when increasing # of police contacts.
Families will be separated. Undocumented immigrants will be deported, where they may face violence in their home country after prolonged detention in horrific immigration facilities. Many, many more people will experience the trauma of being shackled and caged.
And consistent with SFPD’s well-documented track record, this will happen disproportionately to people of color, and exclusively to poor people. sfchronicle.com/projects/2022/…
But never fear, Jenkins has hired an all-female management team. Supporters will point to this, and to the fact that she is a Black and Latina woman, to justify, excuse, or ignore the harm she will directly cause to Black and Latinx and poor people.
That’s like saying we should support Clarence Thomas because he is Black, or Amy Coney Barrett because she’s a woman. This type of neoliberal identitarianism is in part how we ended up in a world where women’s bodies are criminalized, and where all bodily autonomy is at risk.
This is not the same thing as saying that identity and representation don’t matter—of course they do. Only that they are not dispositive. For more on this I highly recommend Racecraft by Barbara and Karen Fields, or Asad Haider. theintercept.com/2018/05/27/ide…
And watch, Jenkins and her office will couch their cruel and failed Drug War offensive in the language of compassion. They’ll say they want drug users to get help. That is false. What they are doing is utterly inconsistent with helping anyone.
Are they going to house people? Address trauma and poverty? Of course not. Remember, this is about wanting to hide from public view the consequences of enforcing their extractive utopia. Mayor Breed made that clear in what should have been a scandal here.
Journalists absolutely cannot let them get away with this. When writing about this admin, they should ask basic questions about these policies: Is there any evidence they work? Has the office consulted any experts in relevant fields to develop responses that do? Other Qs below.
San Francisco was far from perfect. Like anywhere, people suffer every day here because they are poor. The racial disparities in our criminal legal system are among the worst. But we have regressed immensely in just a matter of days. Things will almost certainly get worse.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Calloway

Peter Calloway Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @petercalloway

Jun 16, 2023
This common argument—that we *need* Drug War policies to save the city—relies on some faulty (and troubling) premises. I'll explain below.
(1) "Arresting drug users and dealers will 'clean up' the streets and make the city safer." The reality is that arresting users & dealers will, at best, temporarily move open drug use from one part of the city to another, or disperse it more widely throughout. It's not a solution
(2) "San Francisco is unsafe." The reality is that SF is among the safest major cities in California and the country. Plenty of reporting making that clear. And to the extent perceptions of danger/violence contribute to economic precarity, playing into this Fox trope is harmful.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 16, 2023
The level of deception and disinformation from San Francisco's Drug War proponents is getting out of hand. For over a year, they've said their attacks on the poor were about treatment and compassion. Now, even the chief of police acknowledges it was a lie. missionlocal.org/2023/06/police… Image
CHP is in on the grift. They've been conducting traffic stops for things like broken taillights as a pretext for looking for drugs. They deny that's what they are doing, but not credibly—they were brought into the city for the *explicit purpose* of targeting drug use/sales. Image
What's worse is that these lies are in support of policies they know will not only fail to reduce drug use or overdoses, but will actually make them worse. Just craven politics that will literally cost lives.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 15, 2023
So many people like this guy claim that most crime in San Francisco just isn’t prosecuted. It’s a ludicrous proposition easily disprovable by any thinking person who cares. But in one respect, he has a point🧵
He’s correct that *some* crime goes unprosecuted. For example, the crimes our district attorney, Brooke Jenkins, committed to get the job she has.
There’s also the rampant wage theft by corporations against their working-class employees.
Read 11 tweets
Apr 30, 2023
Perhaps the cops should stop showing up 5-12 deep to every misdemeanor theft or vandalism? That’s not an exaggeration either. I read the reports, I watch the bodycam footage, I represent the clients.
SFPD is not understaffed. They’re lying. And the pro-cop politicians are too. Don’t forget that one of the loudest was literally SFPD’s PR guy before being appointed supervisor. Copagandist in chief.
And I’m arguing on their terms here and setting aside the evidence that more police won’t actually do anything to reduce the harms that Lee here and his friend (if his friend is in fact real) claim to care about.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 18, 2023
London Breed is a murderer. It sounds extreme, I know. But I'll support that claim below, and comment on the steady rightward shift in SF crime politics. 🧵
In December, Breed shut down the Tenderloin Center, a place where unhoused folks could get respite from the harsh streets and access medical care, showers, food, and basic human decency. Ending that—with no replacement—is cruel enough. But the consequences have been much worse.
Overdose deaths have spiked since the center shut down, which is exactly what advocates and observers said would happen when the imminent closure was announced. Around 300 overdoses were reversed at the center.
Read 16 tweets
Mar 18, 2023
In December, Breed shut down the Tenderloin Center, a place where unhoused folks could get respite from the harsh streets and access medical care, showers, food, and basic human decency. Ending that—with no replacement—is cruel enough. But the consequences have been much worse.
Overdose deaths have spiked since the center shut down, which is exactly what advocates and observers said would happen when the imminent closure was announced. Around 300 overdoses were reversed at the center.
Everyone knew that many of those people would die without the center and its services. And now, they have. People pleaded with the mayor, begged her not to do this. She did it anyway. These deaths are on her hands, and hopefully her conscience.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(