Bettina Ryll Profile picture
Jul 18 27 tweets 5 min read
So, working on something that loosely falls under 'patient involvement in research'. Loosely as, let's face it, most of it that just dutty- dutty pat-on-the-head
after years of Pharma THEPATIENTATTHE❤️OFALLWEDO- as long as that's an indication they got a new, usually expensive, new drug for, obviously, otherwise you get dumped at the speed of light-
all this *enthusiasm* of researchers suddenly keen to involve patients in their research projects?! It's definitely not met with anything like that in our community.....
So, all sweet-talk aside, we totally get researchers today need to increasingly involve patients to get their favourite research project funded in the first place. We lobby for that, folks 🙄🙄🙄
That's because 1. moral advocacy seldom works but everyone gets money 2. research funding not leading to sufficient societal benefit (have a guess who funds research) being a BIG issue, both for funders and patients alike
However, when it then comes to the actual involvement in research projects, that's where the real issues start. If you plotted activities against the ability to shape the actual research outcomes, something like this Image
Loosely following a research project's life cycle, from the project idea over research conduct to final communication, dissemination and exploitation, this will look something like this Image
Because of the interdependency- the best communication of a poorly designed research project can only ever go so far- the ability to shape outcomes within the research project continuously decreases, the later one gets involved.
Exploitation? Tends to happen after the research project and in a different setting, with a new set of rules. And obviously dependent on what you decide to exploit, be it for e.g. policy or commercial purposes
However, *within* a given research project, have a guess where patient involvement tends to land? First, it gets lumped in with communication and dissemination and even within there, it will end in the dissemination bracket.
Ever been told as a patient advocate 'that's just too hard for patients to understand?!' Never mind you have years of experience of organising constantly over-subscribed conferences and workshops for those very people?
Given material of rather non-impressive quality to 'distribute to your patient community' and if it's just too awful, you spend hours- unpaid and without getting any credit for it- turning it into something less embarrassing?
That's btw why we wrote V2A2- researchoutreach.org/articles/v2a2-…
The point is this: being asked to share information written by others- and if you are in a research project, you are stuck with metrics and KPIs (Key Performance Indicators), so it's not that you got a choice to share or not
Just uses us- and our networks and our reputation- as not much more than bots for other's purposes. Zero ability to shape anything- the project was designed, written, conducted, interpreted and written up by others
and to add to the insult, if you have an EU project and a not-well-design communication strategy, you will be documenting your every tweet in an excel sheet 🙄
None of that will help a single patient, let alone save lives. As my colleague and friend @GilliosaSB keeps saying 'they keep us busy with irrelevant stuff to prevent us from doing what we should be doing'....
So what should we be doing then? Now *that* is the jackpot answer. Because, as it turns out, every time we went to a consortium and said 'no way', we want to do something else, they went: 'sure, just write it up'
Which tbh wasn't what we had expected 🤷🤷 and it's actually causing us some serious headaches- and will be on our 2023 work program for sure. We have always discussed Science and projects with different stakeholders- in any shape and form possible. Unofficially. Officially.
In writing. In discussions. In private emails, on public stages- whenever there was an opportunity. People come for an opinion- well, those who want an honest opinion, the others don't come ;)
We know we can make most research and research projects better, by one way or the other. But getting this systematic and consistent? Looks like we got some work cut out for our community....
And I've been thinking about good examples about why this matters. And that's actually a perfect one: it's a recent overview piece on the gut microbiome and the response to immune therapy, a lot in #Melanoma nature.com/articles/d4158…
By now, there is an awful lot of research and activity going on. However, as the article states, 'the link to food is still not well-understood'. That, from a patient perspective, is simply insane.
We all have to eat. One of the most-asked question on cancer patient forums is: is there any diet I can follow in order to improve my chances to survive this? There is a huge industry targeting cancer patients with evidence-free products, making money on their backs
So what do we think research programs that were designed based on what patients considered relevant would fund? And what would this Nature article look like if that were the case?
And as patient advocates we should have an opinion on situations like these: If we already know today that their solution will be expensive- we know that this leads to inequality in cancer care and outcomes *by design*.
And if we have just read a bit about innovation then we know that constraints matter: we need an accessible, inexpensive solution if we ever want this to have large-scale impact. So it looks like *this* is one of the things we should be focusing on when it comes to research

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bettina Ryll

Bettina Ryll Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BettinaRyll

Jul 11
An advocacy colleague of mine just complained about having had to sit through a talk short of an hour on how to talk patients into participating in clinical trials *without* a single reference to what clinical trials have to deliver for patients, so here some explaining 🧵
relevant for any patient considering participating in a clinical trial and equally, any patient advocate asked to provide 'a patient perspective' on clinical trials
in cancer, considering ignoring if it's a trial where the risk to yourself and your life is negligeable or you don't dare contradicting your oncologist anyway (though consider changing oncologist in that case)
Read 63 tweets
May 26
After some recent experiences, here some thoughts on patient involvement in research, in particular for my colleagues in patient advocacy. A 🧵
An increasing number of grant agencies ask for patient involvement in research projects. That's usually after political pressure, like when evaluations show that the public doesn't seen the value of innovation and research- like with #Horizon2020
Or when people realise that vested interests of diverse parties prevent progress and that having the very person in whose interest everyone *claims* to act in the room tends to unblock things....
Read 48 tweets
Oct 1, 2021
This 👇. Might look like *lost in technical detail* but this is precisely the level of detail that matters when you are in cancer, whatever the reason.
From a patient perspective and with the risk of upsetting the maximum number of non-patient people- but don't worry, we do this all for PATIENT BENEFIT DONT WE ♥️♥️♥️♥️ 😇😇😇😇😈😈😈😈
it's save to assume that our oncologists don't understand translational research nor statisticians. Our Translational researchers don't understand statistics nor the clinic. And surprise, statisticians don't understand neither the translation nor the clinic reality.
Read 11 tweets
Oct 1, 2021
It's Friday evening. And today is the day where I've been patient-involved one too many times. So all of you patient-at-the-heart-of-all-we-dos, this is for you 🧵
I got into patient advocacy because #Melanoma killed my husband in a horrific way. And the healthcare system overall, in particular the clinical trials that were his only option, only added to the insult.
He died barely 37. I was 35. Our daughters 4 and 6. The time between his diagnosis and his death- and the time after- were horrendous. Looking back, I'm not quite sure how I managed. But I DID manage.
Read 72 tweets
Apr 18, 2021
Ok. Recently, I have been approached a lot to be involved as patient advocate in grant applications for cancer research projects. Let's call the entire experience *suboptimal*, so here are a few pointers, for researchers and patient advocates alike.
So, I totally get that no one exactly knows what patient advocacy is. I for starters started thinking about it after someone else called me a patient advocate after I which I felt obliged to have an opinion.
I also get that grants are stressful- I have never submitted anything that wasn't last minute (usually minus a margin, I'm not that crazy, usually). And that people read that 'you have to involve a PA'(= patient advocate *not* personal assistant) just before deadline
Read 46 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(