Yes, somebody in their 70s is likely to have more coordination problems, so is more likely to fall over because of toe clips. So it's not as if there is no aging issues here.
But the fact that Joe can ride a bicycle (as opposed to Trump who can't) is a sign of vitality.
The majority of the population hasn't ridden with toe clips, so this leaves their mind as an important factor in the incident. In their minds, it's reduced to Joe Biden falling over. And because they politically want to be believe, they become impervious to truth.
It's equally the case with Trump struggling to walk down a ramp. We know he wears lifts in his shoes because he's vain about his height. We know it's a steep ramp. Anybody walking down a steep ramp in lifts will struggle.
We know these facts yet people who hate want to ignore them and insist that something else is wrong with Trump. Yes, many things are wrong with Trump, but there's nothing particular wrong with #rampgate.
Polarization demands that be must see everything in the stupidest possible light, to justify our hate for one or the other.
I've been an executive and handed such things. I've called my assistant and asked which city I was in. At a certain level you cease to be able to cope with everything and simply let yourself be handled by your handlers.
I was merely a CTO at a small 100 person company meeting with customers, press, and doing speech, a tiny fraction of what a President of the US must deal with. I know for a fact that a young vigorous president (e.g. Obama) was bewildered most of the time.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is the typical sort of thing that plagues Twitter. The facts are true, but people misunderstand the context. twitter.com/i/events/15495…
People don't know what the "Strategic Petroleum Reserve" is. They imagine something like a reserve to keep the military running in case of attack. Instead, it's part of global agreement in case of world oil shocks.
It's part of the IEA, a cartel of oil IMPORTING countries, who agreed upon common action of the cartel of oil EXPORTING countries caused oil shocks in the 1970s.
By the way, I'm relatively pro-police. I don't view them as oppressors so much as incompetent public servants.
If they pull you over for speeding, they either have the evidence of such or they don't. When they ask "do you know how fast you were going?" it's not a fight for your rights. You have a right not to answer.
1/ I'm a libertarian so I used to consider the Federalist as my kinda people. Then they got all Trumpy and discarded all their principles. As an elections fact-checker, I know this is false.
2/ Things like Lindell's "Absolute 9-0" and D'Souza's "2000 Mules" claim evidence of mass fraud, but keep it secret so nobody can see. Moreover, their claims are incredibly improbable, technology just doesn't work as they claim, so no rational person would believe without proof.
3/ Fact-check: There's no evidence of mass voter fraud. The only evidence of fraud is just occasional incidents by individuals you every year (by both parties) that doesn't come close to overturning the election.
Um, wow.
It's a plausible response, it's common that such things happen resulting in deletions of data. Very plausible. If they just gave the facts, I'd believe them.
But the tone of this response makes me not believe them.