Come to the @icmlconf ML4Astro workshop today to see some exciting new ideas for ML approaches to astronomy! icml.cc/virtual/2022/w…
Here are five contributed papers I coauthored which will be presented today–come check them out:
"Learning Galaxy Properties from Merger Trees"
Led by @AstroCKragh, this paper asks: can we predict galaxy properties by using dark matter halo merger history (i.e., the merger tree)? It turns out: yes, and quite accurately too!
"Robust Simulation-Based Inference with Bayesian Neural Networks"
Led by @PabloLemosP. This looks at making SBI generalize better to real data by using Bayesian neural networks!
"GaMPEN: An ML Framework for Estimating Galaxy Morphological Parameters and Quantifying Uncertainty"
(oral 10am) by @aritraghsh09. This algorithm gives full posteriors over morphological parameters, w/ rotational equivariance!
3/n This effect is experienced to some extent by nearly all natural systems - including planetary dynamics.
Moving one planet by the *width of a hair* can change the timescale over which a planetary system destabilizes (e.g., ejection of a planet) by a factor of three!
Machine learning is both underused and overused in astrophysics.
What do I mean by this? 👇
1/n
Overused:
Many ML applications in astrophysics aren't necessary. When applied to the wrong problem, modern ML can be overinterpreted and overextrapolated.
E.g., when deep NNs are applied to low-data low-dimensional problems.
2/n
A simpler algorithm will often do just as well and be far more interpretable. Interpretation is the essence of science!
In this regime we need more inductive biases and priors, more Bayes, and more explicit interpretation.
3/n
3/10 Now, some papers mentioned in the thread: @KrippendorfSven - arxiv.org/abs/2003.13679 - identifies symmetries by considering generating operators in a compressed latent space