New York Times finally decided to open a bureau in Kyiv to cover Ukraine from Ukraine and not from Moscow as it's been done for decades. You may ask who will be the chief? Of course Andrew Kramer, the guy who worked for Moscow NYT bureau ๐คก nytco.com/press/andrew-kโฆ
Also, this is the guy who got a Sputnik vaccine shot to prove how good the russian healthcare system actually is and how wrong western experts were about this vaccine, because it all was just "politicized". nytimes.com/2021/01/08/worโฆ
Also, just found that this is the same guy that called a right-liberal party "Democratic Axe" a nationalist group that poses a threat not just to Russia. ๐คก And this the future chief of ๐บ๐ฆ @nytimes nytimes.com/2022/02/10/worโฆ
Why did Kramer pronounced nonsense in this case? Because he doesn't know Ukraine and have no idea what's going on here. Just take a look at Democratic Axe party description and their ideas about social freedoms and rights, as an example. Sounds like something that poses threat?
According to future chief of ๐บ๐ฆ @nytimes the occupied Donetsk region is apparently just an Eastern Ukrainian separatist enclave.
Occupied territories of Ukraine and Georgia are just separatist zones. Anyway what could you expect from @nytimes?
Back in 2018 future chief of Ukrainian @nytimes was trying to get accreditation from terrorists in occupied Donetsk.
And of course @AndrewKramerNYT called russian war against Ukraine a 'civil war'. Anyone surprised? And yes, this is the chief of ๐บ๐ฆ @nytimes
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
๐งตLet's talk about language. This point is valid but the problem is that russians heavily weaponized the russian language. They treat the russian language as some sort of culturally-anthropological DNA (absurd, yes). Hence, per russian logic anyone who speaks russian = russian 1/
'Speak russian or die' written on ๐ท๐บsoldier's vest reflects a longstanding state policy. Throughout history russia's consistently enforced this directive. Russian language remains a pivotal tool in justifying their invasion of Ukraine serving as a key propaganda narrative /2
russian empire and USSR extensively enforced Russification in occupied countries varying in degrees of success. Ukraine bore a heavy brunt, as russians has been deliberately trying to obliterate its culture, language, and identity over centuries. /3
Let me tell you one fact about such nuanced policies carried by Stalin. It may be not so known as other crimes. Did you know that Stalin introduced a tax for fruit trees? Yes, you read it right: if you owned a good orchard then you had pay enormous taxes. 1/
After the war the Soviet economy (if we can call it so) and welfare (LOL) went down to an even worse shithole than in 1930s. Soviets introduced a bunch of new policies to improve agriculture and tried to bring Kolkhoz (collective farms) to new levels. 2/
Soviets promised an unprecedented system of incentives. They even introduced payment in money instead natural products (food) as it was before. But in reality most of the villagers never got money or received much less than promised. 3/
Another problem that I see now with all this recent drama is that NAFO is being largely discredited in the eyes of Ukrainians by NAFO themselves. More and more Ukrainians raise questions about what's going as at the beginning NAFO was a breath of fresh air. Will see how it goes.
When I found NAFO on May/June oh god it was so great and needed at that time. So many great people with a simple and clear goal. It had been so great for a couple of months. But now recently my feed is full of bickering between everybody. Where are good old days?
Previously I could talk to any fella and felt confident in them but not now. Right now I just have several old school fellas back from may/summer I interact with.
๐งตThread with pages from Soviet magazine "ะะตัะตัั" ('Pepper') from 1930s. This is one of the most blatant propaganda papers that was extremely popular in Ukrainian SSR and was published in Ukrainian. Another example how russians used national languages. #RussianColonialism /1
1932. Holodomor. Millions of Ukrainians are starving to death as a result of man made famine. Meanwhile, the article tells us about food riots in Hindenburg (now Zabrze, Poland) and how police arrest hungry people there. /2
1933. Holodomor. Millions of Ukrainians are starving to death as a result of man made famine. The cover shows the dialogue of two peasants:
- Why are there so many people in the field?
- As the proverb says: Hard work brings plenty of food to kolkhoz. /3
The world should have acted when this happened. Ichkeria, almost 30 years ago. It was ignored. Then again. Then Georgia. Then Ukraine and Syria. And here we are. And the world is still looking for good russians and ways to save putin's face.
And it was mainly ignored in Ukraine as well due to a fucking massive russian propaganda. I remember growing up and my parents were consuming russian point of view on these wars specifically via russian TV channels. Fucked up as hell.
I started to realize what was going on only in high school when I began learning history on my own.
I won't dive into the details to debunk this bullshit but I'll show just one simple piece of stats for your own conclusions. Life length expectancy in the USA and USSR. Note that 1970-1980s are considered a successful period in the USSR history.
The thing that tankies don't understand is that we, Ukrainians, don't deny Asharshylyk and other man made famines in the USSR and don't treat our tragedy as something special. All we do - WE SPEAK OUT about this crime on national/international level and tankies hate it.