Zach Conn Profile picture
Jul 23 40 tweets 7 min read
Ok, time for a #SHEAR2022 roundtable (figuratively speaking — literally it’s a quadrilateral) on “Teaching History Amidst the History Wars: A Conversation with Secondary School History Teachers.” A subject near and dear to my heart!
Co-chair of roundtable @brfranklin4 begins with the important (and heartwarming!) point that it’s not just that college profs have something to offer high school teachers—the exchange can and should go both ways.
Nelva Williamson (@nelva) teaches at Young Women’s College Preparatory Academy, an all girls’ public school in Houston. She helped found the school and is a pilot teacher this year for the brand-new AP African American Studies course.
Chris Dier (@chrisdier) is an award-winning teacher at a progressive charter high school in NOLA (where apparently many traditional public schools were turned into charters in wake of Katrina)
Dr. Rebecca Brenner Graham (@TheOtherRBG) teaches at a prestigious girls’ prep school in Northern VA, including a class called Radical US History (RUSH) in addition to maintaining a research career
Dr. Thomas Richards (@TWRichardsJ) teaches at a prep school in Philly called Springside Chestnut Hill Academy — formerly single sex and conservative, now co-ed and relatively progressive after girls’ school bailed out boys’ school — in addition to maintaining research career
Williamson: teaches at majority-minority school in the “blue dot” of Houston amid red Texas. Teaching the truth about US history is NOT to teach CRT!
Dier has conducted original research into specific traumatic episodes in New Orleans history to share with students. Published op-ed arguing that a proposed Louisiana so-called anti-CRT law would forbid teaching true history. Fortunately the bill failed.
RBG: a major difference between secondary school and college teaching is that in the former the students’ parents play an active role, including sharing opinions on teaching of hard histories
RBG: There is a real appetite among students for teaching on histories of race and racism—some of her students, picking up on language from media, actually explicitly requested a CRT class
Richards: His school, with its recent commitment to progressivism, has separate DEI team now to introduce DEI material throughout curriculum. History dept of course very much believes in teaching hard histories but doesn’t see eye to eye with DEI team methodologically
DEI team tends to start with a statement about the present, look for direct solutions, glance back at past instrumentally as opposed to History dept’s investment in deep roots, nuance, contingency, complexity
Multiple panelists agree that (as Williamson puts it) “the students are not the problem.” Even the chaos at schools, not to mention the bad faith, tends to come from adults (including outside agitators, parents, etc)
Williamson: Her approach in the classroom places primary sources above all else. “The primary sources are not going to lie.” (This is my own approach in secondary classroom though I am still refining it — inspiring to know it has worked well for such a master teacher!)
Dier: At one point Louisiana made it so that 11th grade American history students not enrolled in APUSH started in 1877 so as to avoid the “controversial” issues of slavery and the Civil War. Big jeers, naturally, from the #SHEAR2022 crowd!
This is no longer the case, but even the move away from it has not responded enough to actual teachers— new curriculum, frustratingly, did not move toward inquiry-based learning
RBG like Williamson has found that primary sources are clutch when teaching hard histories. Here’s the evidence, guys.
RBG serves on a VA history teacher’s council with a number of public schools teachers. The anti-CRT wave has in general affected them a lot more than it has teachers like her who work at (in some ways — not wrt income inequality!) progressive private schools
Richards also has curricular flexibility. For example, the “box to check” on official curriculum for the American Revolution is simply something like “Cover the causes, course, and consequences of the Am Rev”
In stark contrast, as public school teacher in Texas, Williamson has to follow a curriculum with 135(!) objectives per year. Recently objectives amended to exclude topics like MLK(!), Lincoln-Douglas debates.
Fortunately, the admin at her individual school is quite supportive of her energetic efforts to help push state curriculum in more truthful direction that doesn’t overlook/whitewash slavery and race. Same situation for Dier at his school.
RBG and Richards have both found a big appetite, at least among some students, for progressive curriculum. At Richards’s school there is a particularly vocal cohort of left-wing culture warriors whose sanctimony sometimes draws eye-rolls from more apolitical students
Williamson makes a powerful call for scholars to get involved with public schools in their area. High school students do so much for you by preparing students—do your part in other direction. For example you can physically go into schools and do guest lectures, book talks.
Dier has had historians come in and the students LOVE it, refer back to the guest lectures throughout the year. They love to meet experts and be taken seriously as thinkers—a message they is sent to them when scholars take the time to talk with them.
RBG: 1 big way historians can help secondary ed teachers is by making meaningful, interesting primary sources accessible. (Shoutout to big macher @woodyholtonusc who’s walking the walk by being in the crowd today and has shared some great Am Rev sources)
Good think pieces can also be useful in classroom — particularly ones that are genuinely stimulating and convey authorial personality in addition to content. *Translate* and *highlight* aspects of your findings. Don’t try to hurriedly “dumb down” an entire book.
Richards: Be aware that as a scholar you haven’t actually been trained in pedagogy. There’s a lot out there that you can learn about pedagogy as such if you look for it.
Williamson’s advice for new hs teachers: Be your authentic self in the classroom. Be true. Do your homework. Do your research. Don’t try to be anybody else. That won’t work. Be truthful and forthright to your students—they can smell a fake immediately
A good question from audience about what libraries and archives can do to help high school teachers.
Richards: Understandably libraries tend to think of digitization in terms of more, more, more. Check it out, we’ve digitized every page of a massive collection!
But if you want to be useful to teachers, it is so helpful if you can select particularly good sources, distill/abridge them, and provide context and even discussion questions.
Question from crowd: what can scholarly associations do to help high school teachers?
Dier: Great to be given a seat at the table, invited to attend and speak at conferences. Been teaching for 13 years but only in last year has that happened (he’s too modest to say this but I’ll say this is quite belated since he is a big deal teacher!)
Besides the meeting/talk itself these invitations allow for creation of ongoing relationships. He is now in correspondence with several professors who can provide valuable sources and content knowledge
Williamson: Helpful for you to write op-eds publicly condemning the anti-CRT panic. Helpful for you NOT to crudely badmouth high school teachers (You learned nothing in high school and I’m going to teach you everything now)
For one thing this will often turn the students against you because “they love us”
To get a lil personal: I used to have the college upper classroom school those new to college history on Day 1 by asking “What are the differences between high school and college history?” with an implied sneer
I said this even though I LOVED my hs history teachers! In the intervening years I had inhaled deeply the sweet sweet fumes of academic snobbery.
I am eating my words now. Not that there aren’t some differences in general but so foolish to set up a stark opposition, and especially to imply that one is somehow “less than”
Thanks so much to the panelists for sharing their wisdom and to all the higher ed people who sent a message of solidarity by attending today

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zach Conn

Zach Conn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZachariasConn

Jul 23
Now I am going to try to do something impossible: to live tweet the #SHEAR2022 presidential address from my amazing advisor, Joanne Freeman @jbf1755
As many of you will already know, she is a master of incisive, witty, powerful language — so with this talk in particular I will be butchering it here and if you’re not in the room you should look out for the printed version that will come out in @TheJERPano
Talk will discuss how emotion has impacted US politics in concrete ways—the emotional logic of American politics—especially outrage, both unintentionally elicited and intentionally provoked
Read 24 tweets
Jul 23
Good morning from #SHEAR2022! I’m going to do my best to share highlights from the panel “Federal Sovereignty and State Policy: Authority, Law, and Governance in the Early Republic”
First up, @GraceMallon3, postdoc at Oxford, with “Federal Indian Policy and the Problem of the States in the 1790s” drawn from a project that takes an empirical approach to how state-federal relations worked in practice in the early national period
Argues that state governments continued to play a major role in Indian policy beyond the famous examples of Georgia and Tennessee in Removal era, sometimes helping and sometimes hindering fed government. This can teach us about early US federalism more generally.
Read 32 tweets
Jul 22
Greetings from #SHEAR2022. Welcome to my inevitably shambolic attempt to live tweet 3 rich papers from the panel “New Intellectual Histories of the Republic”!
First up, Hampton Smith, phd candidate at MIT, with “Weaving Black Mathematics.” Smith begins by discussing a powerful historiography demonstrating the multi-faceted deleterious role of quantification in Atlantic slavery — the dehumanizing effects of turning ppl into numbers.
Smith does not contest this historiography but is contributing to a newer stream of scholarship showing that the enslaved had their own forms of quantification/numeracy
Read 37 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(