My favorite historical "discoveries" are ones male anthropologists/historians just *can't* figure out for YEARS that are swiftly answered by a woman when one is finally given access.
"But what could this ancient tablet of instructions even MEAN!"
Woman: "it's a recipe".
They're almost always things traditionally associated with women or the domestic sphere.
"Why did they keep knives up on the ceiling beams?! Must be about being closer to their gods."
Woman: "To keep the kids from getting them."
And a lot of times, it's like these men forget women existed.
"The hands in these ancient cave paintings are so small! Must have been the young men painting them!"
Woman: "Women painted them."
This is one of many, many reasons why representation across all professions is so important. We ALL have biases, and having a truly representative team of people helps fill in those gaps.
If everyone is looking at something from the same angle, we miss the full picture.
(Quick note that I know folks in the field have been aware of this phenomenon for a long time. I still think the examples of it are amusing. And I'm using them as a way to make a point about representation outside of that particular field. Also, sometimes we can just have fun.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I failed to get her name because I am a goober, but the Captain at the main Universal gate this morning was 100% f*cking awesome keeping us hyped, blowing out her voice with chants, never losing energy. Thank you, and I hope you get some rest!
(I hate chanting, I don't chant... I was, for ME, enthusiastically chanting by the end.)
Also, thank you to the SAG-AFTRA members and students who were out there with us as well. It is so meaningful to have your support!
I was an assistant when the 2007 strike was called. I was fired within 20 minutes of the news breaking (not by my boss, mind you). I had maybe a month of savings at that point as I made very little as an assistant... (cont'd)
Since I was not union and I lost my job through no fault of my own, I applied for Unemployment Insurance.
They held off my claim for two months as they decided whether or not those fired because of the strike would receive benefits. I had no money coming in. (cont'd)
I made it through with some help and UI finally relenting and paying me my benefits.
Assistants and support staff are going through the same thing now with this strike. If you have the means, please consider donating to the Entertainment Community Fund which provides assistance.
The answer is that no, writers on shows do not write for a single character across episodes. We write every character in our scripts. Individual writers may have an affinity for specific characters, but we have to be able to write them all.
Studios set show budgets, not Showrunners. Studios control how much money is budgeted for writing staff. Every single showrunner I know has been fighting tooth and nail for more money for writers. So studios started minirooms and short orders and a thousand little workarounds...
That's why the WGA is proposing minimums for size of writing staffs. That's why they're proposing minimums for length of employment. Why they're proposing pay increases.
That's WHY we're doing this. We're flexing our power collectively. That's how we make change.
The studio statement yesterday about staff size minimums said the WGA is demanding a minimum number of writers "even if they're not needed."
So far, the studios have been deciding how many are needed, NOT the showrunners. Y'know, the people who actually KNOW how many they need.