Me: “I think it’s significant that this project was initiated by early-career scientists. It speaks to the prevailing culture in academia that allows the status quo to be perpetuated.
We felt that if we didn’t do the analysis, nobody else would.”
science.org/content/articl…
We felt that if we didn’t do the analysis, nobody else would.”
science.org/content/articl…
Feels a little cringe to quote myself, but I admit, I really needed to get that one out of my system.
I'm ready to have this convo, anytime. 👇
I'm ready to have this convo, anytime. 👇
https://twitter.com/NeedhiBhalla/status/1551637150604660742?s=20&t=cj82BNhls4XVN72aIr1Ukg
Here’s the link to our preprint: osf.io/xb57u/
For now, 3 asks:
1⃣ Read the paper.
2⃣ Send it to people.
3⃣ Talk about it — here & elsewhere.
What does this mean for the STEM community & #NSFfunded science? What does this mean to *you*? And what should be done next?
For now, 3 asks:
1⃣ Read the paper.
2⃣ Send it to people.
3⃣ Talk about it — here & elsewhere.
What does this mean for the STEM community & #NSFfunded science? What does this mean to *you*? And what should be done next?
In addition to what's being said on Twitter, various science community members are sharing their thoughts & commentary on our analysis — check them out. 👇
https://twitter.com/drugmonkeyblog/status/1550650878045999105
Here's @dr_sun_shine's commentary and personal story on YouTube: 👇
https://twitter.com/dr_sun_shine/status/1551096611308052483
And @hormiga's post on his blog, Small Pond Science
https://twitter.com/hormiga/status/1551537873480028161
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
