MILK TIME 🥛! Have you ever considered that it’s a bit weird that you drink the milk of another animal, and it’s totally normal? Milk is a billion-dollar industry.
A *HUGE* new human evolution paper just dropped, upending one of the great modern evolutionary ideas. 🧵 1/n
This paper is possibly the biggest crossover event since Avengers Infinity War, from m’colleagues @mt_genes, @mendel_random@ogu_bristol (follow them), Richard Evershed Melanie Roffet-Salque
🧵 by me as a proxy for the authors 2/n
The story until today: many people around the world drink milk from other animals throughout their lives. Though seemingly normal, they are unusual in that regard, because most people in history didn’t drink milk after weaning without tummy troubles. 3/n
We started using milk from other animals around 10k years ago, before the emergence of this ability. It all comes down to a mutation in a gene that enables the digestion of a sugar called LACTOSE 4/n
People who have this mutation are Lactase Persistent (LP). Without it, you are LNP, and could be Lactose Intolerant. 5/n
Everyone can digest lactose when they’re a nipper, but the gene typically switches off by the age of 5. The LP mutation has increased in frequency very rapidly became extremely common, to the extent that most Europeans are LP 6/n
[Sidenote 1: …as indeed are many populations around the world who have dairy pastoralism in their ancestors. Something that Neo-Nazis failed to recognise when they started chugging milk to prove their racial purity.] 7/n
[🧬 Sidenote 2: the typical mutation is actually in an enhancer for the gene LCT, 13,000 base pairs up-stream from the gene itself, the enzyme that breaks down lactase is unaltered, but its expression is maintained into adulthood in LP.] 8/n
LP is a textbook (and *ahem* popular science book) example of GENE-CULTURE CO-EVOLUTION. We began farming milk, and a novel genetic mutation allowed us to drink it into adulthood, so rapidly was +ve selected – AND THAT’S WHY YOU CAN HAVE DIARRHOEA-FREE MILK IN YOUR CORNFLAKES 9/n
BUT! The new study in @nature shows that this story is not correct. It’s incredible, 360 work, combining archaeology, chemistry, genetics, epidemiology, and more than 500,000 people living and dead, to reveal the wild complexity of human evolution. 10/n go.nature.com/3S85w31
METHODS
* Detection of 6899 animal fats on ancient 13,181 potshards from 550 sites
* DNA from 1,786 long-dead people on when/where the LP gene was in the past
METHODS
* Epidemiology to relate LP to milk consumption/health outcomes
* Modelling on environmental factors driving LP evolution / natural selection
12/n
RESULTS
* It turns out that milk consumption was common for thousands of years *before* the LP gene spread significantly: so selection of this gene is unlikely to be due to its positive effects because it allowed individuals to consume more milk. 13/n
* Epidemiology of a cohort of 500,000 contemporary Europeans in UK Biobank reveals that LP people don’t drink much more than the lactase non-persistent, and there are no major differences in symptoms and health outcomes between LP and LNP individuals
* It wasn’t milk use that drove the spread of LP. Instead, it looks like threats of famine, and infectious agents statistically explain where and when the LP gene took off.
It wasn’t that dairy emerged and spread as a result of the LP mutation bestowing benefits to the drinkers. Milk drinking was common in LNP people, and had little detrimental effects *until* periods of famine or increased pathogen exposure 16/n
In malnourished people, lactose-induced diarrhoea can shift from not being evident or at most an inconvenience to a fatal condition rapidly, what the authors call a ‘crisis mechanism’. The same goes for pathogen exposure as a ‘chronic mechanism’ 17/n
So, those who teach human evolution - or are merely interested in the greatest story ever told - have to rewrite your lectures. 18/n
I fucking LOVE this paper. If anything, it shows that even our well evidenced theories of human adaptation and selection are often reductively naïve. 19/n
LP is one of the areas of human evolution that we know best, and yet our best explanations so far turned out to be hugely simplistic, if not wrong.
Stunning work by @mt_genes, @mendel_random (who are very responsive here), Richard Evershed, Melanie Roffet-Salque et al.
20/20
23/20
The Telegraph decided to go for the work angle: Fine, apart from all the times they shat themselves to death so hard hard that LP became the norm.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
'Everyone was afraid of the guys with the mad eyes, who ran in from the crowds and pop pop pop they fired or ka-boom they blew their killer waistcoats.'
Baffling decision by @ISIRonline to invite Kirkegaard to their meeting. Forget his obnoxity; from a purely academic position:
*His work is of a consistently low standard
*Publishes in cosplaying fake journals that he set up
*No background/scholarly credibility in this or any area
@ISIRonline There are 100s of scientists whose work would suit this meeting, and this invitation mocks the whole field – which already attracts more than its fair share of racists, ‘independent scholars’ and LARPing cranks. I support @dr_appie stance.
@ISIRonline@dr_appie And before the chuntering about academic freedom of speech kicks off, there is no obligation to share a platform with anyone. The invitation itself shows foolishness, and devalues scholarship. Abdel’s action shows principle. Whatever fallout, @ISIRonline have ridiculed themselves
Many of us have been saying this for years. Sapiens is brimming with errors both trivial and profound, and a casualness with evidence that is Petersonesque. I know of no book where expert criticism and popularity are so polar.
Grateful for @dznarayanan. I’ve often been challenged to point out its errors, and never done it, overwhelming as they are - the thermodynamics of bullshit: it takes much more effort to refute a claim than to make it, hence the entropy of guff or lies only increases.
One positive though: I’ve got two friends who started dating after their mutual hatred of Sapiens brought them together. ❤️
Andrew Murchison? Andrew Murrison? Alan Partridge?
Unreadable due to being a) photographed after a big exhalation from a mahussive bong
b) Taken by you dad
0/10
Chris Skidmore. Short and well formatted, handwritten salutation, but minus points for the odd positioning of the Destination name and address. 8/10
Will Quince. High quality. Succinct, left justified, Handwritten salutation and sign-off. I'm giving this a 9/10, only dropping a point because of some inelegant orphans.
He's probably best known for giving the introduction to Ed Wood's Plan 9 from Outer Space - that's where I first came across him. I love this speech so much I used it as the epigraph for the final chapter in one of my books: