Thread by @teupangina

exposing @osshunbi.

let's talk about how she's continuously writing harmful stuff that is affecting trej0's image. :)

also, i'll be using screenshots because her shitass blocked me, and that says a lot because she knows she's in the wrong. everyone is free to reply and dm me to share their insight about this.

to her readers who felt that there's smth wrong about her aus but are afraid to speak up because she is a big account, i empathize with you. and for the people who are going to defend her, please take this thread seriously and try your best to understand the points before you do.

tw: explicit sexualization of minors

i'm doing this to bring light into the situation because it needs to stop, and this is to show you her characters badly affecting the image of the portrayers (trej0)

1. her biggest flaw is writing r-18 scenes and using minor portrayers for it. on top of that, one of the minors is paired up with an adult— and she doesn't even hold herself accountable for this. all she and her peers do is to justify her actions.

[context below]

context:

(1st photo) this is her knowing that it's wrong because when people asked her for a smut scene between y0sh!hw4n, and she answered that she wants to see the pandemic end, meaning she knows that there's going to be a consequence if ever she writes one.

(2nd photo) blairan is y0sh!hw4n on her au entitled "in his lens", again, people are asking for a smut scene between the two but she answered that she doesn't want to be jailed (again, it means that she knows it's morally wrong to write a smut scene that uses a minor portrayer)

(3rd photo) calling people who ships y0sh!hw4n "kaposas" which means cellmate, in prison. this instills a very weird imagery of the two instead of just keeping things wholesome. on different platforms, u'd see interactions between the two and the comments are full of weird stuff.

(4th photo) and she did. she wrote a smut scene that is portrayed by a minor and an adult. it doesn't matter if they're aged up in the au, hw4n is still a minor in real life, and his photos wherein he's still a minor are being used to portray the character. that's problematic.

[context below]

context:

this was written on 11/7/20, for her au "my ghoster lover" wherein the character that is portrayed by 16-year old h4rut0 said, "kasi last time nabayo pa ako sakaniya (referring to jw00's char) noon at napa "yes" sya out of nowhere kung pwede bang kami na" which means

"he said yes out of nowhere as i was thrusting in him" lol again, this was portrayed by minors. the pictures used for the contact photos are when they were still 16 lol

weird weird themes for a story that is portrayed by minors—all the sexual themes yet when called out they justified it with "it's fiction" forgetting that it is fan fiction/rpf, and the people that you're using are real and are still minors irl.

"there are no minors on the said au" lmao it's like you're just aging them up for you to be able to justify the way that you are sexualizing them :)

tw: 4buse, explic!t c0ntent

* got this screenshots for proof only, didn't read this shit but saw some words from it, i can't stomach it *

[context below]

context:

1st pic: explicit narration for hades x eli, portrayed by h/j/w from her au "in his lens" and it was posted on 2021-04-10; rut0 was 17, and w00 was 16 in real life during that time.

2nd pic: explicit narration for valentin x luan, portrayed by h/j/w from her au "hn12" and it was posted on 2021-07-02; rut0 was 17, and w00 was 16 in real life during that time.

3rd pic: explicit narration for rivo x arche, portrayed by y0sh!hw4n from her au "hn12" and it was posted on 2021-07-01; y0shi was 21, and hw4n was 16 in real life during that time.

4th pic: explicit narration for rivo x arche, portrayed by y0sh!hw4n from her au "hn12 sequel" and it was posted on 2022-03-14; y0shi was 22, and hw4n was 17 in real life during that time.

she was called out numerous times for this however she puts her profile on private and then goes back like nothing happened, or she would block the people who are calling her out.

no remorse, no self reflecting, then she just acts unbothered and her peers are the ones who'd justify what she does.

aside from this, it is not only harmful for the portrayers but for the queer community as well, especially mlm, her works are full of stereotypes, as it keeps on insinuating that queer relationships are always sexualized. there's always a bottom and a top.

2. does not properly tag her works, no matter how much vi0lence is in it, no matter how much bl00d is shed, and no matter how triggering it might be for the readers—no proper tags or warnings.

these narrations contains gun$, bl00d, 4buse, s3xual themes however there are no trigger warnings—when called out for it, they would justify it with you are responsible for what you consume, as well as comparing it with print media when it's different.

this is her thoughts about puttig tags and tw:

for context: she's brushing off putting tags because she thinks it's not necessary and saying that it's like a school recitation thing then said she's jk.

3. all in all, it's problematic how they would do the most in order to justify what they're doing—most of her peers do, as well as her roleplayers for the characters.

MORE PROOF AS TO HOW IT AFFECTS TREJ0 IN A BAD WAY:

this was posted on tiktok without context, just their faces being put out there, as well as the yg tag and their real names.

but not once did cookies ever held herself accountable even if she's the one who wrote the au, and instilled this kind of imagery to her readers. she put out a little disclaimer and that's that. just that.

when i called out someone for being so excited to read rivo and arche's explicit scene, they answered that the story is fictional, however you'd see them do this—like i said, it is entirely impossible to separate fiction from reality because she is using real people as portrayers

the least she could do is to write them properly or hold herself accountable—but she did neither.

[context below]

i know this is long but please do read it.

this was sent by an oomf, they tried to reach out to cookies friend because like i said all she did was block us when we were trying to call her out. the gist of this is that oomf was asking the friend to let cookies know, so that she would hold herself accountable—

—but the friend replied that it's all up to cookies how she would respond, while that's right, the best that you could do is to not enable her but as you can see, the friend tried to justify cookies by comparing it to les miserables, which is a theater play.

a completely different work of "art" so it doesn't have the same principles as aus that are available here on twitter. :)

STILL ABT THE TAGS! i qrted this friend because all i see them do is enable cookies and promote her works on tiktok, and they were defending cookies. i mean i do admit that i was aggressive with the way i quoted them but it's bc they keep on shrugging this off.

my replies below!

typos:

1. * you'd see me pick up smth from the psychological thriller aisle

:)))))

regarding the exchange between oomf and cookies' friend, here is my opinion about it. AGAIN, my sole opinion. this is on me and these are my thoughts about it.

that's it, please do try to understand the points and don't let it just fly past your head. ik we all just want good things toward trej0's way. :)

apparently, i'm not done with this thread and cookies did use the r-word as an insult on her au. someone dmed me this! :) being neurodivergent isn't an insult, cookies. :)

* the person who tweeted this has a sibling that has the condition that why they reached out to me

cookies, this is your effect sa baby t3umes who are just trying to find a ship na they want to support. your works are being circulated all over tapos wala ka pa ring ginagawa even if your readers are being affected to this extent.

tw: r4pe

gago ka cookies, nagbigay ka ng access sa minor sa explicit scene where in your character was being r4ped. no tw and such. wala ka talagang pake, kahit sa readers mo! so much for pretending to be unbothered.

this is coming from a person who was able to read ur work, cookies. kahit man lang pakitang tao na, "please skip this if you're a minor" 6 WORDS LANG di mo pa natype, sabagay, sinesexualize mo nga minors so why would u even ask your minor readers not to read the r18 scenes.

and to the people who are an avid supporter of her, please stop the weird jokes surrounding y0shi (e.g: d$wd, bata, makukulong, and p3do) please STOP IT, it’s unfunny and super laganap kayo sa tiktok.

it’s always the ugly portrayals of queer relationships, it’s your readers who are asking you as well to hold yourself accountable—ik wishful thinking nating mga bading to get our rights pero sana you properly represented the issue.

also gaga ka for ruining my sunshine’s image.

another minor reader who reached out to me. see how important tags are? you literally triggered someone's anxiety because you're irresponsible and so unbothered not to put the right tags nor trigger warnings. :)

this is about her character from in his lens that is portrayed by m4sh!kyü, it was glorifying cheating and a lot of people were uncomfy abt, they wanted to speak up but is afraid because of your following—kasi nga di ka man lang nag-cocontrol damage or lagi mo lang binubrush off

another minor who reached out because of your au, it was being passed on and recommended everywhere pero wala kang ginawa control what was happening and to keep the minors away from ur shit my gosh, lagi kayong the readers should be responsible enough e ikaw nga irresponsible din

i feel bad kasi akala nila it's entirely their fault na they were able to consume and read your works. yun kasi yung ininstill nyo sa kanila. na the responsibility solely lies on the readers e ikaw nga walang ginagawa to control what was going on. kahit simple disclaimer, wala.

adding screenshots from minors who dmed me, i'm doing this to amplify their voices bc their feelings are valid. if i see u invalidating these people then i'd automatically think na u're shit kasi again walang syang reminder na "minors dni" "if you're a minor please skip this" etc

tw: mentions of death, rape, violence on the following panels

* if she lacked tags, ako na naglagay lol and please if it'll trigger you, please don't read na po. protect your headspace.

also this is to note how tags are so important kasi this is digital media, hindi naman tevm3s lang makakakita nyan. tags would've been helpful for people like them.

again, the tags and the use of minor portrayers to depict such an ugly scene.

how does it affect trej0? ganto.

calling out ≠ hating.

you've reached until here, please take time to read this mini thread as well.

https://twitter.com/teupangina/status/1552824208333602816

also for the threats na isusumbong ako or what, please stop making me laugh.

https://twitter.com/teupangina/status/1552827368208998401

again, wala akong pake kung galit kayo sakin for calling cookies out. di nyo ko kilala, at di ko rin kayo kilala. pero it's sad na you guys are throwing away your morals just to defend her.

https://twitter.com/teupangina/status/1552815409833050112

lastly, feel free pa rin to dm me about your experience kasi i would empathize with you pero i'm really ending the thread here.

and guys, i'm not galit but please if you do dm me—do not send photos of her narration kasi it's been triggering enough.

last na talaga to kasi ang kukulit nung iba, hindi ko pinapalaki or binibigdeal yung "issue"—it's just these actions should be stopped. continue creating your art esp if it's making you happy pero sana not at the expense of somebody else. that's the whole point of this thread.