Tories are arguing that wages must not rise as strongly as prices or we will get an inflationary spiral. But that’s ridiculous. All price increases add to the income of the companies charging them. What the Tories are saying is business should profit, not workers. A thread……
As a simple, straightforward, fact of life money does not disappear into black holes. When one person spends it another one gets it. That’s just the way it is. It is, however, astonishing how many economists and politicians do not recognise this fact.
The reaction to inflationary price increases - which are now happening on everything from energy costs to margarine - is an indication of this lack of understanding, especially on politicians' part. What they seem quite unable to understand is that someone gains from these.
This should not be very hard to work out. Let me play a game of ‘just suppose’, as economists do. Just suppose there is a company that charged £100 for its product. The split of that £100 was £40 for bought-in products for resale, £40 to the company’s employees and £20 to profit
Now the company’s supplier increases its prices by 10%. So it has to pay £44 for the products it buys in. It then claims this means it must increase its own prices by 10% as a result. So, it ups the price it charges to £110. That’s how general inflation works.
Then the company’s employees demand a pay rise. They are offered 5%, and without a union are forced to accept it. So, the cost of employing its workforce has now increased to £42.
But what has happened to profits? Of the £110 it now charges, because everyone has increased prices by 10%, £44 is going to other companies and £42 to its workers. And that leaves £24 over as profit, which is an increase of £4 in terms of profit.
But note the percentage increase in profit. It’s gone up by 20%, because that’s what a £4 increase in profit compared to the £20 it previously earned means.
So where has that extra profit come from? £2 has simply come the increase in the pre-existing 20% profit share resulting from the price increase. But what if the other £2? That’s come from forcing workers to take a lower than inflation pay rise.
The workers in this company needed a 10% pay rise to keep up with the costs that companies in the economy were charging them. But they did not get it. They only got 5%. So they got a £2 increase, not the £4 they were owed.
But, the £2 did not disappear. The £2 went somewhere. And the only place it could go was to company profits. As a result they did not just go up, but they actually went up by double the rate of inflation.
The result is that his company has, by forcing a below inflation pay rise on its workers, but by imposing inflation level price increases on its customers, seriously increased its profits, and so the well-being of those who share them (the shareholders) at cost to its workforce.
In response you will hear all sorts of excuses. These will include things like ‘but pension funds own shares, so this benefits the workers after all’ and ‘but it’s not a lot’ and that those complaining are ‘engaged in class warfare’. But those claims are nonsense.
Pensions funds used to own a lot of shares, but don’t nearly so much these days. And who cares if ‘it’s not a lot’ when it means workers get 5% and shareholders get 20%? Pointing that out is not ‘class warfare’: it is commenting on what’s happening.
Of course, it could also be said that this is ‘just suppose’ and that this is not what is happening in the real world. Except that it is exactly what is happening in the real world. Shell and Centrica, which owns British Gas, announced massive profits yesterday.
And many of the manufacturers of the data-to-day food and household goods that many people buy have announced 10% or more price increases. MacDonald's has increased the price of a cheeseburger by 20%. Amazon prime has gone up by 12.5%.
And there are, for the record, no equivalent wage increases to match these increasing prices.
And as an aside, also do not suggest that because energy costs have gone up by more than 10% this changes the story. It doesn’t. It just earns that those companies have increased their profits compared to what they pay their workers by an even bigger amount.
So what Tory MPs are actually doing is justifying a big shift in the way in which the rewards in society are being shared right now.
Precisely because many employees in the private sector are getting pay awards way below the inflation rate, but 10% price increases are becoming commonplace, there is a permanent shift going on where profits are being inflated and employees are being left behind.
And let’s not pretend that those profits are being used to reinvest in the businesses that are enjoying them. Shell is paying out most of its profits to shareholders: Centrica is paying extra dividends.
That not only means that not only are employees losing out, but that the better off in society (including those with serious pensions, most of whom are better off) are winning from this.
It is absolutely right that there is right now class war going on: the wealthy are taking the opportunity of this inflation to screw everyone else. That is what is happening.
And the Tory claim is that this does not cause inflation. Except that is completely wrong. The average price of a Bentley has just gone above $200,000. Why? Because the wealthy have been bidding the price up with all their extra income, that’s why.
Whilst many of those who have to work for a living will have to choose between food and heat this winter, the wealthy will have so much extra money that they will be the people who can afford the new prices being charged - and have money left over to bid prices ever upwards.
The reality is that workers cannot be creating an inflationary cycle, because they do not have the means to do so. But the way in which this inflation is panning out, giving those already wealthy way above average pay rises, is feeding straight into a serious inflationary cycle.
What to do about it? Three things, I suggest. First, we need big increases in corporation tax. These need to be 30% on large companies and 25% on smaller ones, with an extra 10% on banks and energy companies who are likely to be winning heavily from this inflation.
Second, we need higher rates of income tax for the top 5% of income earners. This is essential to cancel the inflationary impact of the additional earnings they are enjoying.
And we need to equalise the taxes on income and wealth - because it is absurd that the taxes on wealth like capital gains tax are charged at much lower rates than those charged on income.
But there is also a bit more to it than that. We need government support for workers to get fair pay rises, which requires Boards to be established to check that this is the case, industry by industry. We had them until the 1990s.
And we need legislation that makes it easier for people to be members of trade unions in the private sector.
Alternatively, we can ignore all this and watch people suffer, as a result of which some will undoubtedly die this winter through a lack of money to pay for the essentials of life.
That’s the choice we have got. But the process begins by calling out the total Tory lie that workers must not be paid inflation-matching pay rises because with will create an inflationary cycle. It can’t, and it won’t.
But what is happening is that there is a disguised really big inflationary pay boom going on as a result of the booming profits of the companies that are upping prices and not sharing the gains with their employees. The profits they’re making are fuelling inflation.
And the people who are gaining are those who are already best off. It’s time to call them out because it is true that they are engaged in class warfare against most people in this country, and it’s time for the country to fight back. ENDS

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard Murphy

Richard Murphy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RichardJMurphy

Jul 25
I have been asked on here if I have ever looked at the benefits of freeports. The honest answer is no, but that is because I have never been able to find any such benefits. I have, however, looked at the massive downsides to this idea that both Sunak and Truss support. A thread..
It is important to note that there is no one definition of a freeport. Sunak and Truss are already arguing about what they mean by the term, with Truss being the more extreme of the two. There are, however, some common features to note.
First of all, a freeport need not be a port. It needn’t be an airport either. It’s just a location - from a single warehouse to a whole geographic region - that a government declares to be outside the scope of normal regulation.
Read 33 tweets
Jul 17
Tory leadership candidates are all vying to shrink the state. Their assumption is a private secret job is always better than a state sector job and must deliver more value for society. But that’s not true….a short thread.
The vast majority of state sector jobs have high value added for society. There are the classics, like nurses, teachers, police officers (by and large), and rubbish collectors. The less obvious include the essential health and safety officials and tax inspectors.
Johnson and Sunak want 20% fewer public sector staff. My guess is that they think public servants would add more value in the private sector. All the leadership candidates seem to think the same way, Badenoch most of all.
Read 28 tweets
Jul 15
Every Tory candidate is being asked how they would tackle the cost of living crisis and without exception they are floundering because they all believe it better for households to go into debt, and literally fail, than for governments to create more money to deal with the crisis.
We had crises in 2008 and 2020 and people only survived because the government ran deficits. But they can be inflationary because the rich overly benefit from any stimulus. So deficits have to be matched by significant tax rises on the wealthy.
This is an economic prescription that recognises that 20% or so of people in this country are very well off whilst most of the rest struggle to get by, and that struggle is going to get worse for many of them. There is no room for one policy in that case. There must be two.
Read 5 tweets
Jul 11
There is a real problem amongst the hopeful Tory party leaders. Not one of them seems to understand the role that government has in the national economy. It’s not the black hole they seem to think it is. It’s essential to our national well-being. A thread to explain…..
I try to avoid maths when explaining economics because even the most basic formula seems to make people recoil in shock. But I am going to have to explain one formula to make sense of my arguments in this thread. But, it only involves addition so it’s not hard.
The formula is this:

Y = C + G + I + (X - M)

Y is national income, or gross domestic product (GDP) as it’s called. C is what we consume. G is government consumption to provide goods and services. I is investment in the economy. X is exports, and M imports.
Read 39 tweets
Jul 10
Tax cuts are in the news as Tory party leadership candidates are talking about them as if tax was going out of fashion. It is very apparent that none of them know much about tax, so a thread to discuss some of the issues.
First, because all government spending is, as a matter of fact, funded by government money creation via the Bank of England, which was proved in the quantitative easing eras, the proper role of tax in the economy needs to be understood by these politicians.
That proper role of tax in the macroeconomy - which is what they’re going to be responsible for - is to reduce inflation. Tax cancels government money creation. It takes government-created money resulting from government spending out of circulation.
Read 30 tweets
Jul 9
Questions for Tory Party candidates. A thread to tease out what they really think:

1.Why did you support Boris Johnson?

2. If you criticise Johnson now why didn’t you when in office?
3. Where do you think the Northern Ireland border should be? What do you suggest the UK should do to protect the rights of the EU to maintain a single market which the UK has agreed to uphold in the Good Friday and Brexit agreements?
4. Do you support the deportation of migrants to Rwanda?

5. Do you support the imposition of limitations on the human rights of people in the UK?

6. Do you believe it is wrong to be woke? If so, what is it about racial and other equality that you think wrong?
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(