DeFi Man 🫐 Profile picture
Jul 29 21 tweets 11 min read
6 months ago I shared my thesis about the incoming "GMX Wars" to celebrate the 10 billy mark

Now at $50B the thesis is turning into reality

GMX has appreciated 50% in ETH terms since then

Maybe fading.exe is not the best strategy now anon?

🧵🧵🧵
1. The bull case for any coin is pretty simple as the chad @Ninjascalp shows

Having more buying than selling = numba go up

Token needs to be more attractive for holding than the selling pressure it will face

Being attractive not always equals utility

2. But in the case of $GMX we will make them equal to be fundamentally based

These were and still are the main levers for proving utility in GMX

They need to be profitable enough (directly or indirectly) to offset the extra supply hitting the market

3. All of these levers have increased their potential power bigly in these last months

When fee discounts are introduced I expect most of the projects building on top of GMX to grab a big stack to lower their operational costs and thus net a bigger profit
4. The proposal from @cryp_growth is still being discussed here

Using some rough math, we can see that having 10 people/projects aiming for the max 20% means a buying pressure of 5M$

Not much right?

Well, thats 15% of the circ supply not staked

gov.gmx.io/t/introduce-di…
5. So its really big considering we have been extremely conservative (that demand could well be x5-x10)

Fundamentals & adoption of the protocol has improved a lot in this period

Big whales consistently trading with +10M$ so buying the demanded GMX would be +EV for them
6. Protocol adoption has been even bigger and at least 10 protocols are using GMX as base layer to increase their functionality

@dopex_io @PremiaFinance @UmamiFinance @STFX_IO @rage_trade are just some of the examples

I expect this trend to continue further in the next months
7. Second lever is the fee distribution among stakers

It has consistently keep growing in ETH terms even with the market turmoil

Most likely it will grow faster with synthetics deployment (1-2 months)

At least a x2 is feasible in the short term

8. Players will probably submit to the #realyield narrative and seek yields within one of the protocols with a lower P/E ratio

mirror.xyz/0x6D2BcfEFb7CF…
9. DAO voting power is the last lever

GLP model imposed some restrictions to include new trading pairs

Synthetics deployment will make it way easier and allow to potentially list up to 48 crypto/forex pairs both in Arbitrum & Avalanche

data.chain.link/arbitrum/mainn…
10. This is something submitted to voting

Some projects might be directly impacted by which pairs are running and thus might want to have a big voting power to influence including them

@STFX_IO or @rage_trade to be able to offer more pairs to their traders for example
11. Looks like everything is pretty bullish on the demand side right?

What about the offer?

Its even more bullish, check this to grasp the full picture

12. Long story short, only 550k esGMX will hit the market with current liquidity mining program

This means that there is only a 5,4% of the supply yet to hit the market due to LM

I expect some more to bootstrap liquidity in ZkSync on launch, but nothing too big
13. Currently the numbers look like this:

GMX + esGMX circ supply = 10,1M
GMX + esGMX total supply = 13,25M

Difference is 3,15M tokens

2M sit on the treasury and most likely will not ever hit the market

1M tokens dedicated to marketing are being gradually released
14. The conservative scenario is that 1,15M tokens will be released in the long run (treasury will likely not be needed)

1,15/10,1 = 11,3% tokens still to be released

This is extremely low and its not even accounting for the fact that most of these tokens are esGMX
15. That is right

22% of the total 10,1M are esGMX and not sellable

66% of the esGMX are currently staked and probably will not be vested anytime soon (esGMX tokens are not liquid)

1,15M esGMX to hit the market in the long run

Still talking about selling pressure anon?
16. All of this explains why GMX has been one of the best performing assets last months

Market is reacting to the fact that there are very few tokens left

Powerful real yield bearing tokens

Fade at your own discretion :)

17. Final remarks

-NFA/DYOR
-Avoid FOMO
-Thanks for reading
-Ask in the GMX official group if you have any questions
t.me/GMX_IO
18. Few chads that deliver sound info about $GMX

- @crypto_condom
- @cryp_growth
- @rektdiomedes
- @tanoeth
- @APP0D14L
- @Riley_gmi
- @DeFiSurfer808
- @TheDeFinvestor
20.

Feel free to use my referral code if you want to operate with a 10% discount on fees

gmx.io/#/?ref=Gmxtrad…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with DeFi Man 🫐

DeFi Man 🫐 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Mark2work

Jul 20
$GMX model has received some FUD in the past regarding their oracle pricing model

"Oracle pricing with slight delay makes it harder to win and thus traders lose on average"

I want to shortly address this with some data so hopefully we can set the record straight 🧵
1) It is true that traders lose on average in @GMX_IO both in Arbitrum & Avalanche

But arguing that it has to do with $GMX model would require that traders on CEX make money or at least breakeven on average

Is this true?
2) I think we can have a gut feeling about internal market makers making money on average and thus traders losing it on CEX

Conveniently almost all the big exchanges refrain from offering data on traders win & losses (only wins)

They would if traders won consistently right?
Read 7 tweets
Jul 12
My humble predictions about $GMX synthetics launch:

Still some details are unknown and could be changes

Take this with a grain of salt & medium term timeframe

Let's dive 👇
(1/12)

At launch, Synthetics model will co-exist with $GLP

It will provide way more pairs than currently existing

75% of current leverage trading in CEX is BTC & ETH

25% seems like a small improvement right?

Yes and No
(2/12)

There are three main reasons why it could be a big change

People usually use platforms where they can trade all the pairs they are interested in

With this new development, GMX will be capable of offering trading in all the major pairs & have liq

docs.chain.link/docs/arbitrum-…
Read 14 tweets
Jul 9
Cashflow narrative is shaping up as we speak so..

1. Here you have a shortlist of projects that distribute sound money to holders
2. Comparison between them to figure out which ones are more undervalued/overvalued

Cheers!

mirror.xyz/0x6D2BcfEFb7CF…
Protocols included in the article (II/II):
- @ribbonfinance
- @HegicOptions
- @MetavaultTRADE
- @BlackpoolHQ
- @CapDotFinance
Read 4 tweets
Jun 20
Almost 9 months have passed since @GMX_IO launched

Feels like a good moment to reflect on the growth of the platform to have a better insight into what to expect in the near future

Will try to keep it clear & concise

🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵🧵
1) Executive summary:

- GMX generates 1.7M$ fees per week ✅
- Volumes increase slowly but steady ✅
- The treasury of the project gains 80k$ each week ✅
- P/E ratio stands at 5,5 atm ✅
2) If we plot the full 34 weeks since 27th Oct (when some nice liquidity was bootstrapped in GLP) we obtain the following chart

We can appreciate the following:
- Max weekly fees = $3,548M (26th Jan)
- Min weekly fees = $0,604M (24th Nov)
- Average weekly fees = $1,7M
Read 15 tweets
May 17
I have seen some FUD lately regarding the sustainability of @GMX_IO trading and GLP model

There have comparisons with other protocols that have been suffered from oracle frontrunning, small coin price manipulation etc

Just a few comments regarding this issue (1/6)
GMX previous iteration in BSC (Gambit) experienced problems regarding oracle frontrunning so the team is pretty experienced with it

In order to avoid it in GMX, initial requirements to close positions were quite aggressive to prevent bots taking unfair advantage (2/6)
These requirements have been slowly modified to improve the user experience of the trader but keeping the safety of GLP as the top priority

Current solution seems to be working well, both for traders & liquidity providers. Atm there are no frontrunning issues & good UX (3/6)
Read 6 tweets
May 8
Strategic thinking in crypto 101
1) Before delving full time into the crypto rabbit hole, I spent some years working as a strategy consultant and learned a few interesting lessons

Some of them are applicable to crypto and could help you make certain decisions whether you are a investor, builder etc

Here we go!
2) This is not about giving magical recipes or leaking life changing alpha

This aims to be another framework in your toolkit that improves the decision making process and helps thinking more clearly

Shortcuts rarely exist, be willing to hustle

Read 37 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(