It’s time for today’s #MakeAPlanet quiz! Which set of phenomena were closest in time?

1) T. Rex — Stegosaurus

2) First unicellular life — First multicellular life

3) The ☄️ that killed the dinosaurs — Neanderthals

4) Trilobites first appeared — Trilobites went extinct
Y’all put your time travel caps on today!
So, what’s the answer? Let’s go one by one: The first evidence of life we have in the fossil record dates back about 3.5 billion years ago, only (!) a billion years after Earth formed.

Multicellular life, with its increased complexity?

600 million years ago!
Next longest, we have trilobites, which survived two (!) mass extinctions and thrived as well-armored ocean champs from about 521 million years ago to the end of the Permian, 252 million years ago. They died in the biggest mass extinction on Earth, which eradicated 90% of life.
And, as most of you clever girls (see what I did there?) guessed, T. rex and stegosaurus not only never saw one another, they missed their chance by a whopping 77 million years, putting them at the third-shortest interval. T. Rex lived closer in time to us than many 🦕 species!
Which means the shortest span of time was between the Chixulub ☄️ that killed off 🦖 66 million years ago, and our close cousins, the Neanderthals, who showed up at least 430,000 years ago. Clocking in at ~65.5 million yeas, it beats out T. Rex and Stegosaurus by at least 10 myr.
Want to impress your friends at parties with more deep time knowledge? Support @MakeAPlanetPod! If we get funded, our show will entertain AND educate!

kickstarter.com/projects/makea…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Jacquelyn Gill

Dr. Jacquelyn Gill Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JacquelynGill

Aug 2
For today’s #MakeAPlanet quiz, lets zoom in on what we now call North America. Only one of these mammals evolved here; the others dispersed over land bridges long ago. Which species actually got its start on this continent?

A) Porcupines
B) Bison 🦬
C) Opossums
D) Horses🐴
Deep time—a phrase coined by the writer John McPhee to refer to the vastness of geologic time—shakes up, challenges, and expands so many preconceived ideas about nature. That’s one reason I love it so much.
Answer time! I really love the conversation and thought processes that went into folks' answers. The goal of these quizzes is to get people thinking, wondering, and learning.

So first, let's talk about what DIDN'T originate, evolutionarily speaking, in North America.
Read 10 tweets
Aug 1
We're at 13.8% funding with 45 days to go, which means we need to bring in ~ $815 a day to make @MakeAPlanetPod happen.

We don't have an advertising budget, so the only way to get this thing in front of as many brains as possible is you. Yep, you.

kickstarter.com/projects/makea…
I helped start @OurWarmRegards-- one of the very first climate podcasts-- back in 2016. We were all volunteers, and while I love the show, it definitely showed. For our last season, we leveled up with industry-standard production quality, but zero budget. It wasn't sustainable.
Big networks started climate shows, and we just couldn't compete with ads in Madison Square Garden. Numbers dropped off during the pandemic, even though it was (in my opinion) our best season, by far. We were working ten times as hard for less than half the downloads.
Read 7 tweets
Aug 1
For today's #MakeAPlanet quiz, rank these fossil sizes from smallest to largest:

1) Wingspan of Meganeura, a Carboniferous dragonfly

2) Shoulder height of Hyracotherium, the first horse

3) Beak-to-tail length of Archaeopteryx

4) Length of a ("Giant Claw") Therizinosaurus claw
This question comes from the ideas we have about the past -- and the scale of ancient organisms, which may loom large (or small!) in our minds. I'm much more interested in what you think (or feel) the answer to be, based on your imagination. I don't expect most people to know!
This one was less popular for some reason -- not relatable enough? Too nerdy? Too left-field? Too late in the day? Too Monday?
Read 9 tweets
Jul 30
Really tired of climate edge-lords blaming decades of climate inaction on scientists and not carbon-intensive industries for buying politicians and spending billions on disinformation campaigns, or corporate media for being silent until the last few years.
This is also very closely related to a sort of "if you open your eyes to the real truth, you'll know we're doomed" kind of machismo that I find is prevalent among a lot Twitter dudes who have strong opinions but shallow CVs when it comes to expertise or effort.
Why mostly men? @TricksyRaccoon and I have this conversation a lot but I think it has something to do with the fact that uncertainty is hard for a lot of people, especially people who have never had to really fight for anything. There's a certain kind of control in giving up.
Read 5 tweets
Jul 20
"What if your aborted fetus had grown up to be a scientist, or even the next Darwin?"

Aside from the fact that this scenario could just as easily go the other way (baby Hitler/Stalin/Mao!), it's so revealing that these dudes care more about a hypothetical than a living person.
If they do actually care about this hypothetical, possible future scientist, why wouldn't they also care about me as an actual living breathing scientist? What if I'm the next Darwin (I'm not trying to self-aggrandize, I'm just playing along with their hypothetical)?
I've had a lot of emails from men who read my abortion story in Nature in the last week, and the pattern is always: why are you thinking of yourself instead of 1) future possible scientists, or 2) the elderly who need grandkids, or 3) me, who could have been aborted but wasn't.
Read 8 tweets
Jul 19
There’s a new study out reporting a massive societal decline in plant awareness, based on the decline in the availability of plant courses in the UK. But…: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…
Spending any amount of time on TikTok reveals that younger generations are extremely into 🌻. Some of the most-followed accounts I’ve seen are related to 🌳, foraging, house plants, urban gardening, 🍄, and field botany! So while formal 🪴education may be rare, 🌱 love is not.
This gives me a lot of hope, and I think universities and nature centers should be supporting the plant love boom (bloom?).

(I know fungi are not plants, but many are plant partners, and fungi are often included in botany education programs.)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(