A VERY BASIC INTRODUCTION TO THE HEREDITARIAN POSITION ON RACE AND IQ.
PART 12: The Hereditarian Explanation –- Brain Studies
Hereditarians are quick to point out that one of the most reproducible findings in the science of human intelligence, across dozens of studies, is the association between brain size and intelligence.
Bigger brains (or larger cranial capacity or volume of the interior of the cranium) associate with higher intelligence, on average.
Larger brains contain more neurons and synapses and process information faster.
This finding is important in the race and IQ debate because average brain size has been found to vary by race — northeast Asians have the largest brains, followed by Europeans, and then Sub-Saharan Africans. The mean brain size of races correlates with their average IQs.
A massive 2018 study using UK Biobank data from 13,608 adults, which was controlled for sex, age, height, socioeconomic status and race found a “robust association between total brain volume and fluid intelligence... consistent with previous findings.”
Another even larger (29,004 individuals) and more recent age- and sex-corrected study from 2019 also found an association between total brain volume and general intelligence.
These are just two of the more recent large well-controlled brain size studies. There are many others.
The correlation between brain size and intelligence in MRI studies is typically a “moderate” one between .30 and .40.
It's important to note that modern brain studies use advanced imaging and scanning technologies to accurately measure brain size, and study sample sizes can be dozens or even hundreds of times larger than in studies conducted only decades ago.
Many of the specific genes associated with brain size have now been identified in a large genome-wide association study (GWAS). Others will likely be shortly identified.
Even more intriguing, a 2019 GWAS meta-analysis, one of the largest ever conducted (involving over 50,000 individuals), identified 346 new genes associated in the overlap between brain volume and intelligence.
Estimates from twin studies indicate that genes contribute from 50% to 90% of the variance to both cranial capacities (based on external head size measures) and to brain volume measured by MRI.
“[M]any specific brain structures [are] strongly heritable (i.e., 80% or more)... [there is] a strong heritability for brain volume (greater than 80%).”
Significantly, recent studies, drawing upon multiple data sets, find that the correlation between bigger brains and higher intelligence is a *causal* one.
As previously mentioned, these findings are significant because average brain size appears to vary by race, with most studies finding NE Asians having the largest cranial volume, followed by whites, and then sub-Saharan Africans -– the same order as in their average IQs.
Brain size differences between races are present at birth, which “implies some prenatal and biological mediation.”
One fairly recent study found pre-natal racial differences in head circumference “evident at 21 weeks of gestation.”
Brain size differences between races cannot be adequately explained by poverty and nutrition because they were found even when these variables were dramatically worse in China and Korea than in Europe and the US (which demonstrated smaller brain sizes than NE Asians).
Not only do whites have larger brains, on average, than blacks, but also different regions of the brain vary in size by race — for example, “the OFC and amygdala appear to occupy a significantly greater proportion of the total cerebral volume” of blacks.
Brain structure has also been found to be different between whites and northeast Asians.
Tang Y, Hojatkashani C, Dinov ID, Sun B, Fan L, et al. (2010) The construction of a Chinese MRI brain atlas: a morphometric comparison study between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some of you may have noticed how little I've tweeted over the past two months. There's a reason for this.
I became aware back in April that a "freelance writer" was planning on doing an "expose" on me that would disclose my identity and professional affiliations.
For what it's worth, I don't think this person actually is a freelance writer, but rather someone who threatens and attacks and publicly discloses the identity of people who are interested in intelligence research.
People who have followed me know that I never inject politics or my personal views into my tweets.
99 percent of my tweets consist of nothing more than brief descriptions of (and links to) studies published in the scientific literature.
"Ashkenazi Jews have the highest average IQ of any ethnic group for which there are reliable data. They score 0.75 to 1.0 standard deviations above the general European average, corresponding to an IQ 112 – 115."
"Ashkenazi Jews are just as successful as their tested IQ would predict, and they are hugely overrepresented in occupations and fields with the highest cognitive demands."
"During the 20th century, they made up about 3% of the US population but won 27% of the US Nobel science prizes and 25% of the Turing Awards [in computer science]. They account for more than half of world chess champions."
Study finds male-female brain differences and is able to predict "individual IQ scores for males and females separately using whole-brain functional connectivity."
"Robust predictions of intellectual capabilities were achieved across three independent data sets (680 subjects) and two intelligence measurements (IQ and fluid intelligence) using the same model within each gender."
"Interestingly, we found that intelligence of males and females were underpinned by different neurobiological correlates, which are consistent with their respective superiority in cognitive domains (visuospatial vs verbal ability)."
IQ is the most robust major effect in all of psychology, endlessly replicable and with effect sizes unheard in the discipline, up to and beyond 0.90. Its predictive validity across dozens of outcomes is supported in 1000s of published peer-reviewed studies.
The percentage of published intelligence scientists who question its validity and utility as a measure of general intelligence is probably in the single digits. Criticism of the construct within the field appears to be mostly limited to activist scientists.
I'm suspending my normal prohibition against tweeting links outside published scientific literature to link you to this excellent blog post from psychologist Russell Warne.
"Although it does not take much education for humans to start classifying objects abstractly, many people in the world do not have that level of education, or the education is very low quality."
"Their thinking probably remains grounded in their everyday experience. When these people take a test that solely measures abstract thinking, they perform poorly. This does not make them stupid, nor does it indicate an intellectual disability."
"Ashkenazi Jews have the highest average IQ of any ethnic group for which there are reliable data. They score 0.75 to 1.0 standard deviations above the general European average, corresponding to an IQ 112 – 115."
"This fact has social significance because IQ (as measured by IQ tests) is the best predictor we have of success in academic subjects and most jobs."
"Ashkenazi Jews are just as successful as their tested IQ would predict, and they are hugely overrepresented in occupations and fields with the highest cognitive demands."