Regarding the ethnic hierarchy in Russia. It's not some objective system like the Social Credit. There is of course a broad understanding of who stands higher or lower and the darker your skin is, the lower you are. Nevertheless, privilege and underprivilege are often situational
Example. I knew an Armenian technician from Avtovaz, the largest car producer in Russia located in Samara Oblast. His career wasn't going well and he explained it by his ethnicity:
"If I was some Tukhvatullin ("...ullin" = Tatar surname), I'd have been promoted long ago" said he
What did an Armenian technician mean by that? He didn't mean that Armenians "objectively" stand lower than Tatars. He implied that Armenians don't form a big interest group in Avtovaz. There are too few of them there to form a lobby. There is no Armenian network there to fit in
If you are Armenian, it makes sense to join the Armenian network. But in many places, like the Middle Volga machinery cluster, Armenian networks don't really exist. The Tatar ones do though. So in this specific business and area, it's situationally more advantageous to be a Tatar
Again, the more advantageous position of a Tatar over an Armenian is situational. You come to a factory and join your ethnic network. Or you come and see there's no ethnic network to join. In some other business like the medicine in Moscow, it could be the other way around though
While much of privilege and under-privilege is situational, there's an objective hierarchy, too. To put it simply, the whiter you are, the better. The darker you are, the worse. That's very clear and objective
I know it well, because I am white passing. As a result, I was never stopped by the police, or demanded a bribe. My friends who are darker are stopped literally every day.
One scenario:
Show me your documents -> We detain you for 48 hours to establish your identity [or pay us]
Another problem is accommodation. There's a lot of memes with a common topic:
"How you should look to rent an apartment in Moscow"
The context is that many (most?) adverts are "Slavs-only" (только славянам). So these memes show "perfect renters" - cartoonishly exaggerated Slavs
If you google "только славянам", you will see tons of adverts: both from landlords and from renters. This is indeed very common
That's a big topic in large Russian cities and indeed the battles are being fought over it. This complaint from a probably Azeri potential renter and the response of Avito website may be illustrative of it
Interestingly enough, the largest real estate website ЦИАН prohibited "only for Slavs" adverts in early 2022. Why?
To place an IPO at the New York Stock Exchange. They introduced measures against the ethnic discrimination, just to abide by the rules of the US capitalists
"Only for Slavs" adverts should be interpreted situationally, within the cultural context. Poles may be easily excluded. This Polish guy was surprised to find out that he doesn't satisfy the "Only for Slavs" requirement
Russian realities may look rather absurd for a Westerner. Here you see the Jewish Museum and Center for Tolerance in Moscow advert. They are looking for a bartender of "Slavic appearance"
Very tolerant, indeed. A worker doesn't need to be Slavic, just look Slavic. That's enough
If "Slavs" or people of "Slavic appearance" form the most privileged group in Russia, getting a preferential access to jobs, accommodation, career, etc, then who would occupy the lowest places?
The "Blacks". NB: "Blacks" are not Africans, those are "Negroes"
Interestingly enough, while in the English language, the N. word is offensive and the Black sounds neutral, in Russian it may be the other way around. "Negro" word may be neutral, while "Black" (черный) is always very offensive and dehumanising
These guys are obviously "Black"
"Black" is a synonym of a "wetback": the dark skinned underclass on the bottom of social ladder
I would recommend you to watch the Ravshan and Jamshut episodes here, as a crash course into the Russian ethnic hierarchy. They are the epitome of Blackness
While the Blackness has social and anthropological overtones: the dark skinned underclass from the South working on poorly paid manual jobs, it has a purely religious aspect, too. Generally speaking, Christianity kinda whitens you, while Islam makes you very much more Black
This is reflected in memes, too. Consider this photo of Kadyrov with the Fourteen Words - the white nationalist slogan.
That looks very funny. The joke is that:
1) they may seem to be white 2) while in fact, they're 100% Black
Islam makes you Black and Chechens are super Black
White vs Black dichotomy largely shapes the public consciousness and the internal discourse in Russia. Much of the right wing criticism of Putin is that he is too soft on Blacks. By the way, did you notice you never see a discussion about the criticism of Putin *from the right*?
Narrative on Russia is controlled by the media establishment of Moscow. And this media establishment is too invested into the alliance with the far right, who are advocating for a new crusade on Blackness. I'll elaborate it in my material on the "liberal" opposition. The end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 1927, when Trotsky was being expelled from the Boslhevik Party, the atmosphere was very and very heated. One cavalry commander met Stalin at the stairs and threatened to cut off his ears. He even pretended he is unsheathing he sabre to proceed
Stalin shut up and said nothing
Like obviously, everyone around could see Stalin is super angry. But he still said nothing and did nothing
Which brings us to an important point:
Nobody becomes powerful accidentally
If Joseph Stalin seized the absolute control over the Communist Party, and the Soviet Union, the most plausible explanation is that Joseph Stalin is exercising some extremely rare virtues, that almost nobody on the planet Earth is capable of
Highly virtuous man, almost to the impossible level
Growing up in Russia in the 1990s, I used to put America on a pedestal. It was not so much a conscious decision, as the admission of an objective fact of reality. It was the country of future, the country thinking about the future, and marching into the future.
And nothing reflected this better than the seething hatred it got from Russia, a country stuck in the past, whose imagination was fully preoccupied with the injuries of yesterday, and the phantasies of terrible revenge, usually in the form of nuclear strike.
Which, of course, projected weakness rather than strength
We will make a huuuuuuge bomb, and drop it onto your heads, and turn you into the radioactive dust, and you will die in agony, and we will be laughing and clapping our hands
Fake jobs are completely normal & totally natural. The reason is: nobody understands what is happening and most certainly does not understand why. Like people, including the upper management have some idea of what is happening in an organisation, and this idea is usually wrong.
As they do not know and cannot know causal relations between the input and output, they just try to increase some sort of input, in a hope for a better output, but they do not really know which input to increase.
Insiders with deep & specific knowledge, on the other hand, may have a more clear & definite idea of what is happening, and even certain, non zero degree of understanding of causal links between the input and output
I have recently read someone comparing Trump’s tariffs with collectivisation in the USSR. I think it is an interesting comparison. I don’t think it is exactly the same thing of course. But I indeed think that Stalin’s collectivisation offers an interesting metaphor, a perspective to think about
But let’s make a crash intro first
1. The thing you need to understand about the 1920s USSR is that it was an oligarchic regime. It was not strictly speaking, an autocracy. It was a power of few grandees, of the roughly equal rank.
2. Although Joseph Stalin established himself as the single most influential grandee by 1925, that did not make him a dictator. He was simply the most important guy out there. Otherwise, he was just one of a few. He was not yet the God Emperor he would become later.
The great delusion about popular revolts is that they are provoked by bad conditions of life, and burst out when they exacerbate. Nothing can be further from truth. For the most part, popular revolts do not happen when things get worse. They occur when things turn for the better
This may sound paradoxical and yet, may be easy to explain. When the things had been really, really, really bad, the masses were too weak, to scared and too depressed to even think of raising their head. If they beared any grudges and grievances, they beared them in silence.
When things turn for the better, that is when the people see a chance to restore their pride and agency, and to take revenge for all the past grudges, and all the past fear. As a result, a turn for the better not so much pacifies the population as emboldens and radicalises it.